The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review
This report provides a review of the literature on priority setting in healthcare. It adopts an economic perspective on the problem of choosing the optimal portfolio of programs that can be afforded from a limited national healthcare budget. The traditional economic approach, proposes maximizing health gain (however measured) subject to a budget constraint, which implies ranking programs according to their cost-effectiveness ratio. However, our critical review suggests that this traditional approach is subject to three important difficulties: limitations in economic evaluation methodology, incorporating equity principles, and practical constraints. These suggest a need for a fundamental rethink of the role of cost-effectiveness analysis in priority setting. Methodological concerns include identifying whose perspective to adopt, the generalizability of results to multiple settings, the treatment of uncertainty and timing, and the treatment of interactions between programs. Most equity considerations can be captured in two broad headings: equity related to some concept of need and equity related to access to services. In principle equity concerns can be incorporated into an economic approach to priority setting with relative ease. However we find that many contributions to the debate on equity concepts are theoretical and remote from practical implementation issues. The traditional cost-effectiveness approach generally ignores the numerous practical constraints arising from the political, institutional, and environmental context in which priority setting takes place. These include the influence of interest groups, the transaction costs associated with policy changes, and the interactions between the provision and financing of health services. We find that treatment of such political economy perspectives is the least well-developed aspect of the priority setting literature and suggest some rudimentary models that could serve as a starting point for analysis
id |
dig-okr-1098613700 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-okr-10986137002021-04-23T14:03:09Z The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review Hauck, Katharina Smith, Peter C. Goddard, Maria HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE ABATEMENT ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ADVERSE EFFECTS ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY ALTERNATIVE POLICIES BENEFIT ANALYSIS BUDGET CONSTRAINTS COMPLEX TASK CONSUMERS COST EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH DONOR AGENCIES ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC EVALUATION ECONOMIC POLICY ECONOMIC THEORY ECONOMISTS EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES FAMILY CARE HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE FINANCING HEALTH CARE RESOURCES HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS HEALTH ECONOMICS HEALTH GAIN HEALTH OUTCOMES HEALTH POLICY HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH STATUS HEALTH SYSTEM HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCREMENTAL COSTS INSURANCE INTERVENTION ISOLATION LESSONS LEARNED MALARIA MARGINAL ANALYSIS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES MORBIDITY NUTRITION OPPORTUNITY COSTS OPTIMIZATION PATIENTS POLICY ANALYSIS POLITICAL ECONOMY PRESENT VALUE PRODUCTIVITY PROMOTING HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS PUBLIC SECTOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCARCE RESOURCES SOCIAL POLICY TRANSACTION COSTS TUBERCULOSIS UNCERTAINTY WAGES WEALTH WELFARE ECONOMICS HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE This report provides a review of the literature on priority setting in healthcare. It adopts an economic perspective on the problem of choosing the optimal portfolio of programs that can be afforded from a limited national healthcare budget. The traditional economic approach, proposes maximizing health gain (however measured) subject to a budget constraint, which implies ranking programs according to their cost-effectiveness ratio. However, our critical review suggests that this traditional approach is subject to three important difficulties: limitations in economic evaluation methodology, incorporating equity principles, and practical constraints. These suggest a need for a fundamental rethink of the role of cost-effectiveness analysis in priority setting. Methodological concerns include identifying whose perspective to adopt, the generalizability of results to multiple settings, the treatment of uncertainty and timing, and the treatment of interactions between programs. Most equity considerations can be captured in two broad headings: equity related to some concept of need and equity related to access to services. In principle equity concerns can be incorporated into an economic approach to priority setting with relative ease. However we find that many contributions to the debate on equity concepts are theoretical and remote from practical implementation issues. The traditional cost-effectiveness approach generally ignores the numerous practical constraints arising from the political, institutional, and environmental context in which priority setting takes place. These include the influence of interest groups, the transaction costs associated with policy changes, and the interactions between the provision and financing of health services. We find that treatment of such political economy perspectives is the least well-developed aspect of the priority setting literature and suggest some rudimentary models that could serve as a starting point for analysis 2013-05-30T18:04:43Z 2013-05-30T18:04:43Z 2004-09 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/09/5584467/economics-priority-setting-health-care-literature-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13700 English en_US HNP discussion paper series; CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Working Paper Publications & Research |
institution |
Banco Mundial |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Estados Unidos |
countrycode |
US |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-okr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Norte |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del Banco Mundial |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE ABATEMENT ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ADVERSE EFFECTS ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY ALTERNATIVE POLICIES BENEFIT ANALYSIS BUDGET CONSTRAINTS COMPLEX TASK CONSUMERS COST EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH DONOR AGENCIES ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC EVALUATION ECONOMIC POLICY ECONOMIC THEORY ECONOMISTS EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES FAMILY CARE HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE FINANCING HEALTH CARE RESOURCES HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS HEALTH ECONOMICS HEALTH GAIN HEALTH OUTCOMES HEALTH POLICY HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH STATUS HEALTH SYSTEM HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCREMENTAL COSTS INSURANCE INTERVENTION ISOLATION LESSONS LEARNED MALARIA MARGINAL ANALYSIS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES MORBIDITY NUTRITION OPPORTUNITY COSTS OPTIMIZATION PATIENTS POLICY ANALYSIS POLITICAL ECONOMY PRESENT VALUE PRODUCTIVITY PROMOTING HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS PUBLIC SECTOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCARCE RESOURCES SOCIAL POLICY TRANSACTION COSTS TUBERCULOSIS UNCERTAINTY WAGES WEALTH WELFARE ECONOMICS HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE ABATEMENT ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ADVERSE EFFECTS ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY ALTERNATIVE POLICIES BENEFIT ANALYSIS BUDGET CONSTRAINTS COMPLEX TASK CONSUMERS COST EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH DONOR AGENCIES ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC EVALUATION ECONOMIC POLICY ECONOMIC THEORY ECONOMISTS EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES FAMILY CARE HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE FINANCING HEALTH CARE RESOURCES HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS HEALTH ECONOMICS HEALTH GAIN HEALTH OUTCOMES HEALTH POLICY HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH STATUS HEALTH SYSTEM HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCREMENTAL COSTS INSURANCE INTERVENTION ISOLATION LESSONS LEARNED MALARIA MARGINAL ANALYSIS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES MORBIDITY NUTRITION OPPORTUNITY COSTS OPTIMIZATION PATIENTS POLICY ANALYSIS POLITICAL ECONOMY PRESENT VALUE PRODUCTIVITY PROMOTING HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS PUBLIC SECTOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCARCE RESOURCES SOCIAL POLICY TRANSACTION COSTS TUBERCULOSIS UNCERTAINTY WAGES WEALTH WELFARE ECONOMICS HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE |
spellingShingle |
HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE ABATEMENT ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ADVERSE EFFECTS ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY ALTERNATIVE POLICIES BENEFIT ANALYSIS BUDGET CONSTRAINTS COMPLEX TASK CONSUMERS COST EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH DONOR AGENCIES ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC EVALUATION ECONOMIC POLICY ECONOMIC THEORY ECONOMISTS EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES FAMILY CARE HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE FINANCING HEALTH CARE RESOURCES HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS HEALTH ECONOMICS HEALTH GAIN HEALTH OUTCOMES HEALTH POLICY HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH STATUS HEALTH SYSTEM HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCREMENTAL COSTS INSURANCE INTERVENTION ISOLATION LESSONS LEARNED MALARIA MARGINAL ANALYSIS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES MORBIDITY NUTRITION OPPORTUNITY COSTS OPTIMIZATION PATIENTS POLICY ANALYSIS POLITICAL ECONOMY PRESENT VALUE PRODUCTIVITY PROMOTING HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS PUBLIC SECTOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCARCE RESOURCES SOCIAL POLICY TRANSACTION COSTS TUBERCULOSIS UNCERTAINTY WAGES WEALTH WELFARE ECONOMICS HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE ABATEMENT ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ADVERSE EFFECTS ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY ALTERNATIVE POLICIES BENEFIT ANALYSIS BUDGET CONSTRAINTS COMPLEX TASK CONSUMERS COST EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH DONOR AGENCIES ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC EVALUATION ECONOMIC POLICY ECONOMIC THEORY ECONOMISTS EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES FAMILY CARE HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE FINANCING HEALTH CARE RESOURCES HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS HEALTH ECONOMICS HEALTH GAIN HEALTH OUTCOMES HEALTH POLICY HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH STATUS HEALTH SYSTEM HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCREMENTAL COSTS INSURANCE INTERVENTION ISOLATION LESSONS LEARNED MALARIA MARGINAL ANALYSIS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES MORBIDITY NUTRITION OPPORTUNITY COSTS OPTIMIZATION PATIENTS POLICY ANALYSIS POLITICAL ECONOMY PRESENT VALUE PRODUCTIVITY PROMOTING HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS PUBLIC SECTOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCARCE RESOURCES SOCIAL POLICY TRANSACTION COSTS TUBERCULOSIS UNCERTAINTY WAGES WEALTH WELFARE ECONOMICS HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE Hauck, Katharina Smith, Peter C. Goddard, Maria The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review |
description |
This report provides a review of the
literature on priority setting in healthcare. It adopts an
economic perspective on the problem of choosing the optimal
portfolio of programs that can be afforded from a limited
national healthcare budget. The traditional economic
approach, proposes maximizing health gain (however measured)
subject to a budget constraint, which implies ranking
programs according to their cost-effectiveness ratio.
However, our critical review suggests that this traditional
approach is subject to three important difficulties:
limitations in economic evaluation methodology,
incorporating equity principles, and practical constraints.
These suggest a need for a fundamental rethink of the role
of cost-effectiveness analysis in priority setting.
Methodological concerns include identifying whose
perspective to adopt, the generalizability of results to
multiple settings, the treatment of uncertainty and timing,
and the treatment of interactions between programs. Most
equity considerations can be captured in two broad headings:
equity related to some concept of need and equity related to
access to services. In principle equity concerns can be
incorporated into an economic approach to priority setting
with relative ease. However we find that many contributions
to the debate on equity concepts are theoretical and remote
from practical implementation issues. The traditional
cost-effectiveness approach generally ignores the numerous
practical constraints arising from the political,
institutional, and environmental context in which priority
setting takes place. These include the influence of interest
groups, the transaction costs associated with policy
changes, and the interactions between the provision and
financing of health services. We find that treatment of such
political economy perspectives is the least well-developed
aspect of the priority setting literature and suggest some
rudimentary models that could serve as a starting point for analysis |
format |
Publications & Research :: Working Paper |
topic_facet |
HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE ABATEMENT ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ADVERSE EFFECTS ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY ALTERNATIVE POLICIES BENEFIT ANALYSIS BUDGET CONSTRAINTS COMPLEX TASK CONSUMERS COST EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH DONOR AGENCIES ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC EVALUATION ECONOMIC POLICY ECONOMIC THEORY ECONOMISTS EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES FAMILY CARE HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE FINANCE HEALTH CARE FINANCING HEALTH CARE RESOURCES HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS HEALTH ECONOMICS HEALTH GAIN HEALTH OUTCOMES HEALTH POLICY HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH STATUS HEALTH SYSTEM HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCREMENTAL COSTS INSURANCE INTERVENTION ISOLATION LESSONS LEARNED MALARIA MARGINAL ANALYSIS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES MORBIDITY NUTRITION OPPORTUNITY COSTS OPTIMIZATION PATIENTS POLICY ANALYSIS POLITICAL ECONOMY PRESENT VALUE PRODUCTIVITY PROMOTING HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS PUBLIC SECTOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCARCE RESOURCES SOCIAL POLICY TRANSACTION COSTS TUBERCULOSIS UNCERTAINTY WAGES WEALTH WELFARE ECONOMICS HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH CARE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS HEALTH CARE FINANCE |
author |
Hauck, Katharina Smith, Peter C. Goddard, Maria |
author_facet |
Hauck, Katharina Smith, Peter C. Goddard, Maria |
author_sort |
Hauck, Katharina |
title |
The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review |
title_short |
The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review |
title_full |
The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review |
title_sort |
economics of priority setting for health care : a literature review |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2004-09 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/09/5584467/economics-priority-setting-health-care-literature-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13700 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hauckkatharina theeconomicsofprioritysettingforhealthcarealiteraturereview AT smithpeterc theeconomicsofprioritysettingforhealthcarealiteraturereview AT goddardmaria theeconomicsofprioritysettingforhealthcarealiteraturereview AT hauckkatharina economicsofprioritysettingforhealthcarealiteraturereview AT smithpeterc economicsofprioritysettingforhealthcarealiteraturereview AT goddardmaria economicsofprioritysettingforhealthcarealiteraturereview |
_version_ |
1756572770468102144 |