Romania - Functional Review : Romania Competition Council

The European Union is founded on a competitive market economy unified by commonly agreed rules and practices. While Romania has joined the Union, its ability to prosper fully within the common market requires a strengthened commitment to, and ability to protect, EU competition principles. Romania's legal and organizational framework for enhancing competition is tenuous and the current economic and fiscal crisis puts recent gains at risk. In particular, Romania's performance in competition policy still lags behind EU practice and is characterized by: (i) State-owned enterprises and government participation still play a dominant role in many important markets and sectors in Romania, controlling at least one firm in 14 key sectors of the economy and exhibiting a market share above 50% in at least one segment of network industries. (ii) Relatively low enforcement of competition policy against hard-core cartels and abusive practices while merger review cases that do not significantly impose threats to competition account for the bulk of the workload in the competition area. (iii) Low staffing for competition enforcement and economic analysis placing the Romania Competition Council (RCC) at the bottom of European Union rankings with no internal target deadlines to track performance. (iv) Active advocacy activities mainly focus on raising awareness of the importance of competition law but efforts need to be made to refocus activity on tackling anticompetitive regulation, expand advocacy to key groups within the government and implement alternative advocacy tools. A comprehensive reform program therefore is required at the national level, as well as within the Romanian Competition Council (RCC) as the key agency in guaranteeing healthy competition. Priority actions, further detailed in this report, include the following: (i) improve the competitive environment by reducing the dominant role of the state in several economic sectors, (ii) provide space for a redoubled RCC focus on competition enforcement establish a new unit within RCC to target hard core anti-competitive behavior take immediate steps, within the principles of the government's unified pay system, to ensure a level of compensation to core RCC competition staff commensurate with their responsibilities in front of the judiciary and private sector.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2010-10
Subjects:AGRICULTURE, ALTERNATIVE POLICY INSTRUMENTS, ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES, ANTITRUST LAWS, BARRIERS TO ENTRY, BASIC METALS, BEHAVIORS, BENCHMARKS, BEST PRACTICE, BEST PRACTICES, BUSINESS PRACTICE, BUSINESS PRACTICES, CARTEL, CARTELS, CENTRAL BANK, CENTRAL BANKS, CHANGE MANAGEMENT, COLLABORATION, COLLABORATIONS, COLLECTION OF DATA, COMMERCIALIZATION, COMMON MARKET, COMMUNITIES, COMPETENCIES, COMPETITION FRAMEWORK, COMPETITION POLICIES, COMPETITION POLICY, COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT, COMPETITIVE MARKET, COMPETITIVE MARKETS, COMPETITIVE PRICES, COMPETITIVENESS, COMPETITORS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, CONSUMER GOODS, CONSUMER PROTECTION, CONSUMER SPENDING, CONSUMERS, COST OF ENTRY, CROWDING OUT, DAMAGES, DISCUSSION, DISCUSSIONS, DOCUMENTS, DOMESTIC MARKET, DOMESTIC MARKETS, EARLY REPAYMENT, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS, ECONOMETRICS, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, ECONOMIC CONCENTRATION, ECONOMIC COOPERATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ECONOMIC IMPACT, ECONOMIC SECTORS, ECONOMIC SIZE, ECONOMIC TOOLS, ECONOMIC WELFARE, ECONOMICS, ECONOMICS RESEARCH, ECONOMIES OF SCALE, ECONOMISTS, ELECTRICITY GENERATION, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, ENVIRONMENTAL, EXCLUSIVE CONTRACTS, FAIR, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, GDP, GLOBAL MARKET, GOVERNMENT ACTIONS, GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT, HARMONIZATION, HUMAN RESOURCES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INSIGHTS, INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY, INSURANCE, INTEGRATION, INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICE, INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION, INVENTION, INVENTORY, ITC, LAW ENFORCEMENT, LEADING, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, LIBERALIZATION, MARGINAL VALUE, MARKET COMPETITION, MARKET DEFINITION, MARKET ECONOMY, MARKET EFFICIENCY, MARKET INTEGRATION, MARKET PARTICIPANTS, MARKET PERFORMANCE, MARKET POWER, MARKET REGULATION, MARKET SHARE, MARKET SHARES, MARKET STUDIES, MARKETPLACE, MERGERS, METRICS, MINES, MONOPOLY, MORTGAGE, MORTGAGE CREDITS, MORTGAGE LOANS, ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, OUTPUT, PERFORMANCE MEASURES, POLICY MAKERS, PORTFOLIO, PREDATORY PRICING, PRICE CHANGES, PRICE CONTROL, PRICE CONTROLS, PRICE DISCRIMINATION, PRICE FIXING, PRICE INCREASES, PRICE MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE INVESTORS, PRODUCERS, PRODUCT MARKET, PRODUCTIVITY, PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES, PROPERTY RIGHTS, PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY, PUBLIC FINANCE, PUBLIC POLICIES, REBATE, REFORM PROGRAM, REGULATOR, REGULATORS, REGULATORY AGENCIES, REGULATORY AGENCY, REGULATORY BODIES, REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT, REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, REGULATORY SYSTEM, RELEVANT MARKET, REPUTATION, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, RETAIL, RETAIL MARKET, SAVINGS, SELLING PRICES, SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES, SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, SOURCES OF INFORMATION, STANDARD OF LIVING, SUPPLIERS, SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, TARGET MARKETS, TAX, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TRANSPARENCY, TURNOVER, UNFAIR COMPETITION, VISION, WHOLESALE TRADE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/10/17056885/romania-functional-review-romania-competition-council
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/12281
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items