Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law

The note looks at effective anticorruption legal instruments. However, law enforcement measures are not the first or necessarily the preferred method of defense. An informed citizenry, a government imbued with a service ethic, and other measures can be more effective in combating corruption. But tailoring the law to improve enforcement capacity generally encompasses a variety of statutes that prohibit bribery, nepotism, conflicts of interest, and favoritism in the award of contract or the provision of government benefits. And writing such laws containing "bright-line rules" in contrast to those containing standards open to interpretation by enforcement agencies may make it easier to monitor compliance and enforcement, but also rob the law of flexibility. Such laws often must be simplified to the point of arbitrariness-making them harder to accept than broadly-worded standards, which often conform to intuitive social understandings. The cost of bright-line rules are often more than offset by their deterrence value and their value in facilitating monitoring in countries with weak enforcement agencies. However, no statute can avoid some open-textured provisions. When a section in an anticorruption law must leave something open to question, one way to reduce enforcers' discretion is to establish a procedure for obtaining advance rulings. Finally, the author recommends laws that help bring corruption to light, such as a freedom of information law.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Messick, Richard E., Kleinfeld, Rachel
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2001-10
Subjects:CORRUPTION, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, LAW ENFORCEMENT, LEGAL INSTRUMENTS, CORRUPT PRACTICES, BRIBERY, CIVIL SOCIETY, ETHICS, ENFORCEMENT POWERS, CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS, CONFLICT OF INTERESTS, CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT, PUBLIC DISCLOSURE, LEGAL REFORM, NEPOTISM, SYSTEMIC REFORM, ADVISORY ROLES, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION, ACCESS TO INFORMATION, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ACTIONS, ANTICORRUPTION, ANTICORRUPTION LAWS, ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION, ANTICORRUPTION WORK, AUTHORITY, AWARD OF CONTRACTS, BRIBES, CITIZENS, CIVIL SERVANTS, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, CORRUPT ACTS, CORRUPT OFFICIALS, CRIME, DEMOCRACY, DISCRETION, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES, JUSTICE, LAWYER, LEGAL ASPECTS, LEGAL INSTITUTIONS, LEGAL REFORMS, MEDIA, NATIONAL INTEGRITY, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, NATIONS, PRESIDENCY, PROSECUTION, PUBLIC INTEREST, PUBLIC LAWS, PUBLIC OPINION, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SERVANTS, PUBLIC SERVICES, PUNISHMENT, REPRESENTATIVES, RULINGS, SECRECY, TRANSPARENCY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/10/2011704/writing-effective-anticorruption-law
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11362
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098611362
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986113622024-08-08T17:51:53Z Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law Messick, Richard E. Kleinfeld, Rachel CORRUPTION LEGAL FRAMEWORK LAW ENFORCEMENT LEGAL INSTRUMENTS CORRUPT PRACTICES BRIBERY CIVIL SOCIETY ETHICS ENFORCEMENT POWERS CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS CONFLICT OF INTERESTS CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT PUBLIC DISCLOSURE LEGAL REFORM NEPOTISM CORRUPT PRACTICES SYSTEMIC REFORM ADVISORY ROLES FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACCESS TO INFORMATION INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ACTIONS ANTICORRUPTION ANTICORRUPTION LAWS ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION ANTICORRUPTION WORK AUTHORITY AWARD OF CONTRACTS BRIBERY BRIBES CITIZENS CIVIL SERVANTS CIVIL SOCIETY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST CORRUPT ACTS CORRUPT OFFICIALS CRIME DEMOCRACY DISCRETION ETHICS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES JUSTICE LAWYER LEGAL ASPECTS LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL INSTITUTIONS LEGAL REFORM LEGAL REFORMS MEDIA NATIONAL INTEGRITY NATIONAL LEGISLATION NATIONS NEPOTISM PRESIDENCY PROSECUTION PUBLIC INTEREST PUBLIC LAWS PUBLIC OPINION PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SERVANTS PUBLIC SERVICES PUNISHMENT REPRESENTATIVES RULINGS SECRECY TRANSPARENCY The note looks at effective anticorruption legal instruments. However, law enforcement measures are not the first or necessarily the preferred method of defense. An informed citizenry, a government imbued with a service ethic, and other measures can be more effective in combating corruption. But tailoring the law to improve enforcement capacity generally encompasses a variety of statutes that prohibit bribery, nepotism, conflicts of interest, and favoritism in the award of contract or the provision of government benefits. And writing such laws containing "bright-line rules" in contrast to those containing standards open to interpretation by enforcement agencies may make it easier to monitor compliance and enforcement, but also rob the law of flexibility. Such laws often must be simplified to the point of arbitrariness-making them harder to accept than broadly-worded standards, which often conform to intuitive social understandings. The cost of bright-line rules are often more than offset by their deterrence value and their value in facilitating monitoring in countries with weak enforcement agencies. However, no statute can avoid some open-textured provisions. When a section in an anticorruption law must leave something open to question, one way to reduce enforcers' discretion is to establish a procedure for obtaining advance rulings. Finally, the author recommends laws that help bring corruption to light, such as a freedom of information law. 2012-08-13T14:51:43Z 2012-08-13T14:51:43Z 2001-10 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/10/2011704/writing-effective-anticorruption-law https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11362 English PREM Notes; No. 58 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic CORRUPTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
BRIBERY
CIVIL SOCIETY
ETHICS
ENFORCEMENT POWERS
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
LEGAL REFORM
NEPOTISM
CORRUPT PRACTICES
SYSTEMIC REFORM
ADVISORY ROLES
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ACTIONS
ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION LAWS
ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION
ANTICORRUPTION WORK
AUTHORITY
AWARD OF CONTRACTS
BRIBERY
BRIBES
CITIZENS
CIVIL SERVANTS
CIVIL SOCIETY
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT ACTS
CORRUPT OFFICIALS
CRIME
DEMOCRACY
DISCRETION
ETHICS
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES
JUSTICE
LAWYER
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
LEGAL REFORM
LEGAL REFORMS
MEDIA
NATIONAL INTEGRITY
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
PRESIDENCY
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC INTEREST
PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SERVANTS
PUBLIC SERVICES
PUNISHMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
RULINGS
SECRECY
TRANSPARENCY
CORRUPTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
BRIBERY
CIVIL SOCIETY
ETHICS
ENFORCEMENT POWERS
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
LEGAL REFORM
NEPOTISM
CORRUPT PRACTICES
SYSTEMIC REFORM
ADVISORY ROLES
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ACTIONS
ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION LAWS
ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION
ANTICORRUPTION WORK
AUTHORITY
AWARD OF CONTRACTS
BRIBERY
BRIBES
CITIZENS
CIVIL SERVANTS
CIVIL SOCIETY
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT ACTS
CORRUPT OFFICIALS
CRIME
DEMOCRACY
DISCRETION
ETHICS
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES
JUSTICE
LAWYER
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
LEGAL REFORM
LEGAL REFORMS
MEDIA
NATIONAL INTEGRITY
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
PRESIDENCY
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC INTEREST
PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SERVANTS
PUBLIC SERVICES
PUNISHMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
RULINGS
SECRECY
TRANSPARENCY
spellingShingle CORRUPTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
BRIBERY
CIVIL SOCIETY
ETHICS
ENFORCEMENT POWERS
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
LEGAL REFORM
NEPOTISM
CORRUPT PRACTICES
SYSTEMIC REFORM
ADVISORY ROLES
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ACTIONS
ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION LAWS
ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION
ANTICORRUPTION WORK
AUTHORITY
AWARD OF CONTRACTS
BRIBERY
BRIBES
CITIZENS
CIVIL SERVANTS
CIVIL SOCIETY
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT ACTS
CORRUPT OFFICIALS
CRIME
DEMOCRACY
DISCRETION
ETHICS
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES
JUSTICE
LAWYER
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
LEGAL REFORM
LEGAL REFORMS
MEDIA
NATIONAL INTEGRITY
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
PRESIDENCY
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC INTEREST
PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SERVANTS
PUBLIC SERVICES
PUNISHMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
RULINGS
SECRECY
TRANSPARENCY
CORRUPTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
BRIBERY
CIVIL SOCIETY
ETHICS
ENFORCEMENT POWERS
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
LEGAL REFORM
NEPOTISM
CORRUPT PRACTICES
SYSTEMIC REFORM
ADVISORY ROLES
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ACTIONS
ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION LAWS
ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION
ANTICORRUPTION WORK
AUTHORITY
AWARD OF CONTRACTS
BRIBERY
BRIBES
CITIZENS
CIVIL SERVANTS
CIVIL SOCIETY
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT ACTS
CORRUPT OFFICIALS
CRIME
DEMOCRACY
DISCRETION
ETHICS
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES
JUSTICE
LAWYER
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
LEGAL REFORM
LEGAL REFORMS
MEDIA
NATIONAL INTEGRITY
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
PRESIDENCY
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC INTEREST
PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SERVANTS
PUBLIC SERVICES
PUNISHMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
RULINGS
SECRECY
TRANSPARENCY
Messick, Richard E.
Kleinfeld, Rachel
Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law
description The note looks at effective anticorruption legal instruments. However, law enforcement measures are not the first or necessarily the preferred method of defense. An informed citizenry, a government imbued with a service ethic, and other measures can be more effective in combating corruption. But tailoring the law to improve enforcement capacity generally encompasses a variety of statutes that prohibit bribery, nepotism, conflicts of interest, and favoritism in the award of contract or the provision of government benefits. And writing such laws containing "bright-line rules" in contrast to those containing standards open to interpretation by enforcement agencies may make it easier to monitor compliance and enforcement, but also rob the law of flexibility. Such laws often must be simplified to the point of arbitrariness-making them harder to accept than broadly-worded standards, which often conform to intuitive social understandings. The cost of bright-line rules are often more than offset by their deterrence value and their value in facilitating monitoring in countries with weak enforcement agencies. However, no statute can avoid some open-textured provisions. When a section in an anticorruption law must leave something open to question, one way to reduce enforcers' discretion is to establish a procedure for obtaining advance rulings. Finally, the author recommends laws that help bring corruption to light, such as a freedom of information law.
topic_facet CORRUPTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
BRIBERY
CIVIL SOCIETY
ETHICS
ENFORCEMENT POWERS
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
LEGAL REFORM
NEPOTISM
CORRUPT PRACTICES
SYSTEMIC REFORM
ADVISORY ROLES
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ACTIONS
ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION LAWS
ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION
ANTICORRUPTION WORK
AUTHORITY
AWARD OF CONTRACTS
BRIBERY
BRIBES
CITIZENS
CIVIL SERVANTS
CIVIL SOCIETY
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT ACTS
CORRUPT OFFICIALS
CRIME
DEMOCRACY
DISCRETION
ETHICS
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES
JUSTICE
LAWYER
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
LEGAL REFORM
LEGAL REFORMS
MEDIA
NATIONAL INTEGRITY
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
PRESIDENCY
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC INTEREST
PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SERVANTS
PUBLIC SERVICES
PUNISHMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
RULINGS
SECRECY
TRANSPARENCY
author Messick, Richard E.
Kleinfeld, Rachel
author_facet Messick, Richard E.
Kleinfeld, Rachel
author_sort Messick, Richard E.
title Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law
title_short Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law
title_full Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law
title_fullStr Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law
title_full_unstemmed Writing an Effective Anticorruption Law
title_sort writing an effective anticorruption law
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2001-10
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/10/2011704/writing-effective-anticorruption-law
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11362
work_keys_str_mv AT messickricharde writinganeffectiveanticorruptionlaw
AT kleinfeldrachel writinganeffectiveanticorruptionlaw
_version_ 1807157472226443264