Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector

Although attention has focused on public sector initiatives to fight corruption on the demand side, private companies in every region have developed programs to fight it on the supply side. Policymakers and advocacy groups-such as Transparency International-consider such preventive efforts to be a critical component of the anticorruption toolkit. All types of firms-large and small, multinational and local-recognize that corruption raises the cost of doing business and should be prevented. Most company anticorruption programs rely on compliance systems that consist of a company code of conduct, training, and decisionmaking and reporting mechanisms. This self regulatory approach was pioneered in the 1970s by U.S. multinational corporations after unethical practices were revealed and in response to the 1977 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Until recently this approach was greeted with skepticism outside the United States. Critics argued that efforts to implement U.S. compliance-based techniques would fail in other business cultures. Skeptics also questioned the effectiveness of company anticorruption programs. But such views have changed considerably in recent years, and compliance systems are being implemented by companies from high-income countries as well as emerging markets. Moreover, anticorruption techniques have become more sophisticated in established U.S. systems.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Berenbeim, Ronald E., Arvis, Jean-Francois
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2002-04
Subjects:ANTICORRUPTION, ANTICORRUPTION AGENCIES, ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS, ANTICORRUPTION POLICIES, BRANCHES, BRIBERY, BRIBERY CASES, BRIBES, COMPANY, COMPLAINTS, CORPORATE DIRECTORS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, CORPORATIONS, CORRUPT PRACTICES, ETHICS, EXTORTION, FACILITATING PAYMENTS, FIRMS, FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES, FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT, FRAUD, INFORMERS, JOINT VENTURES, LAW ENFORCEMENT, NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS, PENALTIES, PRIVATE COMPANIES, PROCUREMENT, SANCTIONS, SENTENCING GUIDELINES, SUPPLIERS, TRANSPARENCY, WHISTLEBLOWING CORRUPTION IN POLITICS; CORRUPTION; PRIVATE SECTOR; INCENTIVES; SMALL & MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES; COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION; CODES OF CONDUCT; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; BEST PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; BENCHMARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/04/2016285/implementing-anticorruption-programs-private-sector
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11353
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098611353
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986113532024-08-08T17:51:48Z Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector Berenbeim, Ronald E. Arvis, Jean-Francois ANTICORRUPTION ANTICORRUPTION AGENCIES ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS ANTICORRUPTION POLICIES BRANCHES BRIBERY BRIBERY CASES BRIBES COMPANY COMPLAINTS CORPORATE DIRECTORS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CORPORATIONS CORRUPT PRACTICES ETHICS EXTORTION FACILITATING PAYMENTS FIRMS FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT FRAUD INFORMERS JOINT VENTURES LAW ENFORCEMENT NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS PENALTIES PRIVATE COMPANIES PROCUREMENT SANCTIONS SENTENCING GUIDELINES SUPPLIERS TRANSPARENCY WHISTLEBLOWING CORRUPTION IN POLITICS; CORRUPTION; PRIVATE SECTOR; INCENTIVES; SMALL & MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES; COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION; CODES OF CONDUCT; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; BEST PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; BENCHMARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Although attention has focused on public sector initiatives to fight corruption on the demand side, private companies in every region have developed programs to fight it on the supply side. Policymakers and advocacy groups-such as Transparency International-consider such preventive efforts to be a critical component of the anticorruption toolkit. All types of firms-large and small, multinational and local-recognize that corruption raises the cost of doing business and should be prevented. Most company anticorruption programs rely on compliance systems that consist of a company code of conduct, training, and decisionmaking and reporting mechanisms. This self regulatory approach was pioneered in the 1970s by U.S. multinational corporations after unethical practices were revealed and in response to the 1977 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Until recently this approach was greeted with skepticism outside the United States. Critics argued that efforts to implement U.S. compliance-based techniques would fail in other business cultures. Skeptics also questioned the effectiveness of company anticorruption programs. But such views have changed considerably in recent years, and compliance systems are being implemented by companies from high-income countries as well as emerging markets. Moreover, anticorruption techniques have become more sophisticated in established U.S. systems. 2012-08-13T14:50:18Z 2012-08-13T14:50:18Z 2002-04 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/04/2016285/implementing-anticorruption-programs-private-sector https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11353 English PREM Notes; No. 66 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION AGENCIES
ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS
ANTICORRUPTION POLICIES
BRANCHES
BRIBERY
BRIBERY CASES
BRIBES
COMPANY
COMPLAINTS
CORPORATE DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CORPORATIONS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
ETHICS
EXTORTION
FACILITATING PAYMENTS
FIRMS
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
FRAUD
INFORMERS
JOINT VENTURES
LAW ENFORCEMENT
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PENALTIES
PRIVATE COMPANIES
PROCUREMENT
SANCTIONS
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
SUPPLIERS
TRANSPARENCY
WHISTLEBLOWING CORRUPTION IN POLITICS; CORRUPTION; PRIVATE SECTOR; INCENTIVES; SMALL & MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES; COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION; CODES OF CONDUCT; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; BEST PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; BENCHMARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION AGENCIES
ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS
ANTICORRUPTION POLICIES
BRANCHES
BRIBERY
BRIBERY CASES
BRIBES
COMPANY
COMPLAINTS
CORPORATE DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CORPORATIONS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
ETHICS
EXTORTION
FACILITATING PAYMENTS
FIRMS
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
FRAUD
INFORMERS
JOINT VENTURES
LAW ENFORCEMENT
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PENALTIES
PRIVATE COMPANIES
PROCUREMENT
SANCTIONS
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
SUPPLIERS
TRANSPARENCY
WHISTLEBLOWING CORRUPTION IN POLITICS; CORRUPTION; PRIVATE SECTOR; INCENTIVES; SMALL & MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES; COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION; CODES OF CONDUCT; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; BEST PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; BENCHMARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
spellingShingle ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION AGENCIES
ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS
ANTICORRUPTION POLICIES
BRANCHES
BRIBERY
BRIBERY CASES
BRIBES
COMPANY
COMPLAINTS
CORPORATE DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CORPORATIONS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
ETHICS
EXTORTION
FACILITATING PAYMENTS
FIRMS
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
FRAUD
INFORMERS
JOINT VENTURES
LAW ENFORCEMENT
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PENALTIES
PRIVATE COMPANIES
PROCUREMENT
SANCTIONS
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
SUPPLIERS
TRANSPARENCY
WHISTLEBLOWING CORRUPTION IN POLITICS; CORRUPTION; PRIVATE SECTOR; INCENTIVES; SMALL & MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES; COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION; CODES OF CONDUCT; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; BEST PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; BENCHMARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION AGENCIES
ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS
ANTICORRUPTION POLICIES
BRANCHES
BRIBERY
BRIBERY CASES
BRIBES
COMPANY
COMPLAINTS
CORPORATE DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CORPORATIONS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
ETHICS
EXTORTION
FACILITATING PAYMENTS
FIRMS
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
FRAUD
INFORMERS
JOINT VENTURES
LAW ENFORCEMENT
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PENALTIES
PRIVATE COMPANIES
PROCUREMENT
SANCTIONS
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
SUPPLIERS
TRANSPARENCY
WHISTLEBLOWING CORRUPTION IN POLITICS; CORRUPTION; PRIVATE SECTOR; INCENTIVES; SMALL & MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES; COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION; CODES OF CONDUCT; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; BEST PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; BENCHMARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Berenbeim, Ronald E.
Arvis, Jean-Francois
Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector
description Although attention has focused on public sector initiatives to fight corruption on the demand side, private companies in every region have developed programs to fight it on the supply side. Policymakers and advocacy groups-such as Transparency International-consider such preventive efforts to be a critical component of the anticorruption toolkit. All types of firms-large and small, multinational and local-recognize that corruption raises the cost of doing business and should be prevented. Most company anticorruption programs rely on compliance systems that consist of a company code of conduct, training, and decisionmaking and reporting mechanisms. This self regulatory approach was pioneered in the 1970s by U.S. multinational corporations after unethical practices were revealed and in response to the 1977 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Until recently this approach was greeted with skepticism outside the United States. Critics argued that efforts to implement U.S. compliance-based techniques would fail in other business cultures. Skeptics also questioned the effectiveness of company anticorruption programs. But such views have changed considerably in recent years, and compliance systems are being implemented by companies from high-income countries as well as emerging markets. Moreover, anticorruption techniques have become more sophisticated in established U.S. systems.
topic_facet ANTICORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION AGENCIES
ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS
ANTICORRUPTION POLICIES
BRANCHES
BRIBERY
BRIBERY CASES
BRIBES
COMPANY
COMPLAINTS
CORPORATE DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CORPORATIONS
CORRUPT PRACTICES
ETHICS
EXTORTION
FACILITATING PAYMENTS
FIRMS
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
FRAUD
INFORMERS
JOINT VENTURES
LAW ENFORCEMENT
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PENALTIES
PRIVATE COMPANIES
PROCUREMENT
SANCTIONS
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
SUPPLIERS
TRANSPARENCY
WHISTLEBLOWING CORRUPTION IN POLITICS; CORRUPTION; PRIVATE SECTOR; INCENTIVES; SMALL & MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES; COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION; CODES OF CONDUCT; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; BEST PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; BENCHMARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
author Berenbeim, Ronald E.
Arvis, Jean-Francois
author_facet Berenbeim, Ronald E.
Arvis, Jean-Francois
author_sort Berenbeim, Ronald E.
title Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector
title_short Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector
title_full Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector
title_fullStr Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector
title_full_unstemmed Implementing Anticorruption Programs in the Private Sector
title_sort implementing anticorruption programs in the private sector
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2002-04
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/04/2016285/implementing-anticorruption-programs-private-sector
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11353
work_keys_str_mv AT berenbeimronalde implementinganticorruptionprogramsintheprivatesector
AT arvisjeanfrancois implementinganticorruptionprogramsintheprivatesector
_version_ 1807158885420630016