Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand

Full liberalization of telecommunications markets provides scope for relying largely on general antitrust rules and institutions for economic regulation. But at least for a time after liberalization, sector-specific rules and institutions are likely to be needed in some areas, including interconnection. This Note draws lessons from the experience of New Zealand. After fully liberalizing its telecommunications market in the late 1980s, the country relied primarily on antitrust instruments to regulate interconnection until 2001, when it introduced a new regime putting heavier emphasis on sector-specific regulation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kerf, Michel, Neto, Isabel, Geradin, Damien
Format: Viewpoint biblioteca
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2005-06
Subjects:ANTITRUST LAW, BROADBAND, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, INTERCONNECTION, INTERCONNECTION CHARGES, MARKET POWER, MARKET SHARE, NETWORKS, PEERING, PRICE FIXING, SWITCHES, TELECOM, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TELEPHONE, TELEPHONE SERVICE, TELEPHONE SERVICES, UNIVERSAL SERVICE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/6040157/interconnection-disputes-antitrust-or-sector-regulation-case-new-zealand
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11217
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098611217
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986112172021-04-23T14:02:54Z Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand Kerf, Michel Neto, Isabel Geradin, Damien ANTITRUST LAW BROADBAND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE INTERCONNECTION INTERCONNECTION CHARGES MARKET POWER MARKET SHARE NETWORKS PEERING PRICE FIXING SWITCHES TELECOM TELECOMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICES UNIVERSAL SERVICE Full liberalization of telecommunications markets provides scope for relying largely on general antitrust rules and institutions for economic regulation. But at least for a time after liberalization, sector-specific rules and institutions are likely to be needed in some areas, including interconnection. This Note draws lessons from the experience of New Zealand. After fully liberalizing its telecommunications market in the late 1980s, the country relied primarily on antitrust instruments to regulate interconnection until 2001, when it introduced a new regime putting heavier emphasis on sector-specific regulation. 2012-08-13T14:28:35Z 2012-08-13T14:28:35Z 2005-06 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/6040157/interconnection-disputes-antitrust-or-sector-regulation-case-new-zealand Viewpoint.--Note no. 295 (June 2005) http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11217 English Viewpoint CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Viewpoint Publications & Research East Asia and Pacific New Zealand
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic ANTITRUST LAW
BROADBAND
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
INTERCONNECTION
INTERCONNECTION CHARGES
MARKET POWER
MARKET SHARE
NETWORKS
PEERING
PRICE FIXING
SWITCHES
TELECOM
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TELEPHONE SERVICES
UNIVERSAL SERVICE
ANTITRUST LAW
BROADBAND
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
INTERCONNECTION
INTERCONNECTION CHARGES
MARKET POWER
MARKET SHARE
NETWORKS
PEERING
PRICE FIXING
SWITCHES
TELECOM
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TELEPHONE SERVICES
UNIVERSAL SERVICE
spellingShingle ANTITRUST LAW
BROADBAND
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
INTERCONNECTION
INTERCONNECTION CHARGES
MARKET POWER
MARKET SHARE
NETWORKS
PEERING
PRICE FIXING
SWITCHES
TELECOM
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TELEPHONE SERVICES
UNIVERSAL SERVICE
ANTITRUST LAW
BROADBAND
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
INTERCONNECTION
INTERCONNECTION CHARGES
MARKET POWER
MARKET SHARE
NETWORKS
PEERING
PRICE FIXING
SWITCHES
TELECOM
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TELEPHONE SERVICES
UNIVERSAL SERVICE
Kerf, Michel
Neto, Isabel
Geradin, Damien
Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand
description Full liberalization of telecommunications markets provides scope for relying largely on general antitrust rules and institutions for economic regulation. But at least for a time after liberalization, sector-specific rules and institutions are likely to be needed in some areas, including interconnection. This Note draws lessons from the experience of New Zealand. After fully liberalizing its telecommunications market in the late 1980s, the country relied primarily on antitrust instruments to regulate interconnection until 2001, when it introduced a new regime putting heavier emphasis on sector-specific regulation.
format Publications & Research :: Viewpoint
topic_facet ANTITRUST LAW
BROADBAND
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
INTERCONNECTION
INTERCONNECTION CHARGES
MARKET POWER
MARKET SHARE
NETWORKS
PEERING
PRICE FIXING
SWITCHES
TELECOM
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TELEPHONE SERVICES
UNIVERSAL SERVICE
author Kerf, Michel
Neto, Isabel
Geradin, Damien
author_facet Kerf, Michel
Neto, Isabel
Geradin, Damien
author_sort Kerf, Michel
title Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand
title_short Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand
title_full Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand
title_fullStr Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Interconnection Disputes : Antitrust or Sector Regulation and the Case of New Zealand
title_sort interconnection disputes : antitrust or sector regulation and the case of new zealand
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2005-06
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/6040157/interconnection-disputes-antitrust-or-sector-regulation-case-new-zealand
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11217
work_keys_str_mv AT kerfmichel interconnectiondisputesantitrustorsectorregulationandthecaseofnewzealand
AT netoisabel interconnectiondisputesantitrustorsectorregulationandthecaseofnewzealand
AT geradindamien interconnectiondisputesantitrustorsectorregulationandthecaseofnewzealand
_version_ 1756572412914171904