A review of feral cat eradication on Islands

Feral cats are directly responsible for a large percentage of global extinctions, particularly on islands. We reviewed feral cat eradication programs with the intent of providing information for future island conservation actions. Most insular cat introductions date from the nineteentb and twentieh centuries, wbereas successful eradication programs bave been carried out in the last 30 years, most in the last decade. Globally, feral cats bave been removed from at least 48 islands: 16 in Baja California (Mexico), 10 in New Zealand, 5 in Australia, 4 in the Pacific Ocean, 4 in Seychelles, 3 in the sub-Antarctic, 3 in Macaronesia (Atlantic Ocean), 2 in Mauritius, and 1 in the Caribbean. The majority of these islands (75%; n = 36) are small (<5 km2). The largest successful eradication campaign took place on Marion Island (Seychelles) cat density been successfully removed from only 10 islands (21%) of >10 km2. On Cousine Island (Seychelles) cat density reached 243 cats/km2, but on most islands densities did not exceed 79.2 cats/km2 (n = 22; 81%). The most common methods in successful eradication programs were trapping and bunting (often with dogs; 91% from a total of 43 islands). Frequently, these methods were used togetber. Other methods included poisoning (1080; monofluoracetate in fish baits; n = 13; 31%), secondary poisoning from poisoned rats (n = 4; 10%), and introduction of viral disease (feline panleucopaenia; n = 2; 5%). Impacts from cat predastion and, more recently, the benefits of cat eradications bave been increasingly documented. These impacts and benefits, combined with the continued success of eradication campigns on larger islands, show the value and role of feral cat eradications in biodiversity conservation. However, new and more efficient techniques used in combination with current techniques will likely be needed for success on larger islands.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nogales, Manuel, Martín, Aurelio, Tershy, Bernie R., Donlan, C. Josh, Veitch, Dick, Puerta, Néstor, Wood, Bill, Alonso, Jesús
Other Authors: Gobierno de Canarias
Format: artículo biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:eradication, Felis catus, feral cat, islands, predation effect,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22249
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-ipna-es-10261-22249
record_format koha
spelling dig-ipna-es-10261-222492019-11-18T11:16:56Z A review of feral cat eradication on Islands Nogales, Manuel Martín, Aurelio Tershy, Bernie R. Donlan, C. Josh Veitch, Dick Puerta, Néstor Wood, Bill Alonso, Jesús Gobierno de Canarias European Commission eradication Felis catus feral cat islands predation effect Feral cats are directly responsible for a large percentage of global extinctions, particularly on islands. We reviewed feral cat eradication programs with the intent of providing information for future island conservation actions. Most insular cat introductions date from the nineteentb and twentieh centuries, wbereas successful eradication programs bave been carried out in the last 30 years, most in the last decade. Globally, feral cats bave been removed from at least 48 islands: 16 in Baja California (Mexico), 10 in New Zealand, 5 in Australia, 4 in the Pacific Ocean, 4 in Seychelles, 3 in the sub-Antarctic, 3 in Macaronesia (Atlantic Ocean), 2 in Mauritius, and 1 in the Caribbean. The majority of these islands (75%; n = 36) are small (<5 km2). The largest successful eradication campaign took place on Marion Island (Seychelles) cat density been successfully removed from only 10 islands (21%) of >10 km2. On Cousine Island (Seychelles) cat density reached 243 cats/km2, but on most islands densities did not exceed 79.2 cats/km2 (n = 22; 81%). The most common methods in successful eradication programs were trapping and bunting (often with dogs; 91% from a total of 43 islands). Frequently, these methods were used togetber. Other methods included poisoning (1080; monofluoracetate in fish baits; n = 13; 31%), secondary poisoning from poisoned rats (n = 4; 10%), and introduction of viral disease (feline panleucopaenia; n = 2; 5%). Impacts from cat predastion and, more recently, the benefits of cat eradications bave been increasingly documented. These impacts and benefits, combined with the continued success of eradication campigns on larger islands, show the value and role of feral cat eradications in biodiversity conservation. However, new and more efficient techniques used in combination with current techniques will likely be needed for success on larger islands. This rewiev would not have been possible without the collaboration of many researchers who shared all sorts of information with us, sometimes unpublished. We are especially indebted to D. Merton and B. Bell (New Zealand); A. Burbidge, P. Copley, and G. Copson (Australia); P. Oliveira (Madeira, Portugal); M. Bester, and M. Cohen (South Africa); F. Courchamp, M. Pascal, and J.-L. Chapuis (France); K. Campbell and F. Cruz (Galápagos, Ecuador); S. Roy (Mauritius); M. Rauzon, D. Goltz, E. Campbell, and D. Forsell (Hawaii, U.S.A.); N. Mitchell, M. Naughton, and R, Clapp (U.S.A.); and J. Á. Sánchez, M. Á. Hermosillo, and G. Arnaud (México). J. Berger, E. Main, D. Wenny, and two anonymous referees offered valuable comments to improve the manuscript. Basic research for this paper was conducted as part of a natural resource restoration project supported by the LIFE project (99 NAT/E/006392) of the European Union and ther Cabildo Insular de Lanzarote (Canary Islands, Spain). Peer reviewed 2010-03-11T11:10:13Z 2010-03-11T11:10:13Z 2004 artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Conservation Biology 18: pp. 310-319 (2004) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22249 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780 en open 159634 bytes application/pdf
institution IPNA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-ipna-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IPNA España
language English
topic eradication
Felis catus
feral cat
islands
predation effect
eradication
Felis catus
feral cat
islands
predation effect
spellingShingle eradication
Felis catus
feral cat
islands
predation effect
eradication
Felis catus
feral cat
islands
predation effect
Nogales, Manuel
Martín, Aurelio
Tershy, Bernie R.
Donlan, C. Josh
Veitch, Dick
Puerta, Néstor
Wood, Bill
Alonso, Jesús
A review of feral cat eradication on Islands
description Feral cats are directly responsible for a large percentage of global extinctions, particularly on islands. We reviewed feral cat eradication programs with the intent of providing information for future island conservation actions. Most insular cat introductions date from the nineteentb and twentieh centuries, wbereas successful eradication programs bave been carried out in the last 30 years, most in the last decade. Globally, feral cats bave been removed from at least 48 islands: 16 in Baja California (Mexico), 10 in New Zealand, 5 in Australia, 4 in the Pacific Ocean, 4 in Seychelles, 3 in the sub-Antarctic, 3 in Macaronesia (Atlantic Ocean), 2 in Mauritius, and 1 in the Caribbean. The majority of these islands (75%; n = 36) are small (<5 km2). The largest successful eradication campaign took place on Marion Island (Seychelles) cat density been successfully removed from only 10 islands (21%) of >10 km2. On Cousine Island (Seychelles) cat density reached 243 cats/km2, but on most islands densities did not exceed 79.2 cats/km2 (n = 22; 81%). The most common methods in successful eradication programs were trapping and bunting (often with dogs; 91% from a total of 43 islands). Frequently, these methods were used togetber. Other methods included poisoning (1080; monofluoracetate in fish baits; n = 13; 31%), secondary poisoning from poisoned rats (n = 4; 10%), and introduction of viral disease (feline panleucopaenia; n = 2; 5%). Impacts from cat predastion and, more recently, the benefits of cat eradications bave been increasingly documented. These impacts and benefits, combined with the continued success of eradication campigns on larger islands, show the value and role of feral cat eradications in biodiversity conservation. However, new and more efficient techniques used in combination with current techniques will likely be needed for success on larger islands.
author2 Gobierno de Canarias
author_facet Gobierno de Canarias
Nogales, Manuel
Martín, Aurelio
Tershy, Bernie R.
Donlan, C. Josh
Veitch, Dick
Puerta, Néstor
Wood, Bill
Alonso, Jesús
format artículo
topic_facet eradication
Felis catus
feral cat
islands
predation effect
author Nogales, Manuel
Martín, Aurelio
Tershy, Bernie R.
Donlan, C. Josh
Veitch, Dick
Puerta, Néstor
Wood, Bill
Alonso, Jesús
author_sort Nogales, Manuel
title A review of feral cat eradication on Islands
title_short A review of feral cat eradication on Islands
title_full A review of feral cat eradication on Islands
title_fullStr A review of feral cat eradication on Islands
title_full_unstemmed A review of feral cat eradication on Islands
title_sort review of feral cat eradication on islands
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22249
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780
work_keys_str_mv AT nogalesmanuel areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT martinaurelio areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT tershybernier areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT donlancjosh areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT veitchdick areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT puertanestor areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT woodbill areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT alonsojesus areviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT nogalesmanuel reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT martinaurelio reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT tershybernier reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT donlancjosh reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT veitchdick reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT puertanestor reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT woodbill reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
AT alonsojesus reviewofferalcateradicationonislands
_version_ 1777669696592543744