Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features

In line with global targets agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the number of marine protected areas (MPAs) is increasing rapidly, yet socio-economic benefits generated by MPAs remain difficult to predict and under debate1,2. MPAs often fail to reach their full potential as a consequence of factors such as illegal harvesting, regulations that legally allow detrimental harvesting, or emigration of animals outside boundaries because of continuous habitat or inadequate size of reserve3,4,5. Here we show that the conservation benefits of 87 MPAs investigated worldwide increase exponentially with the accumulation of five key features: no take, well enforced, old (>10 years), large (>100 km2), and isolated by deep water or sand. Using effective MPAs with four or five key features as an unfished standard, comparisons of underwater survey data from effective MPAs with predictions based on survey data from fished coasts indicate that total fish biomass has declined about two-thirds from historical baselines as a result of fishing. Effective MPAs also had twice as many large (>250 mm total length) fish species per transect, five times more large fish biomass, and fourteen times more shark biomass than fished areas. Most (59%) of the MPAs studied had only one or two key features and were not ecologically distinguishable from fished sites. Our results show that global conservation targets based on area alone will not optimize protection of marine biodiversity. More emphasis is needed on better MPA design, durable management and compliance to ensure that MPAs achieve their desired conservation value.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edgar, Graham J., Stuart-Smith, Rick D., Willis, Trevor J., Kininmonth, Stuart J., Baker, Susan C., Banks, Stuart, Barrett, Neville S., Becerro, Mikel, Bernard, Anthony T. F., Berkhout, Just, Buxton, Colin D., Campbell, Stuart J., Cooper, Antonia T., Davey, Marlene, Edgar, Sophie C., Försterra, Günter, Galván, David E., Irigoyen, Alejo J., Kushner, David J., Moura, Rodrigo, Parnell, P. Ed, Shears, N., Soler, German, Strain, Elisabeth M. A., Thomson, Russell J.
Other Authors: Australian Research Council
Format: artículo biblioteca
Published: Springer Nature 2014-02-13
Subjects:Environmental Sciences, Macroecology, Conservation Biology,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180360
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-ipna-es-10261-180360
record_format koha
spelling dig-ipna-es-10261-1803602022-06-14T07:39:33Z Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features Edgar, Graham J. Stuart-Smith, Rick D. Willis, Trevor J. Kininmonth, Stuart J. Baker, Susan C. Banks, Stuart Barrett, Neville S. Becerro, Mikel Bernard, Anthony T. F. Berkhout, Just Buxton, Colin D. Campbell, Stuart J. Cooper, Antonia T. Davey, Marlene Edgar, Sophie C. Försterra, Günter Galván, David E. Irigoyen, Alejo J. Kushner, David J. Moura, Rodrigo Parnell, P. Ed Shears, N. Soler, German Strain, Elisabeth M. A. Thomson, Russell J. Australian Research Council Australian Government Environmental Sciences Macroecology Conservation Biology In line with global targets agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the number of marine protected areas (MPAs) is increasing rapidly, yet socio-economic benefits generated by MPAs remain difficult to predict and under debate1,2. MPAs often fail to reach their full potential as a consequence of factors such as illegal harvesting, regulations that legally allow detrimental harvesting, or emigration of animals outside boundaries because of continuous habitat or inadequate size of reserve3,4,5. Here we show that the conservation benefits of 87 MPAs investigated worldwide increase exponentially with the accumulation of five key features: no take, well enforced, old (>10 years), large (>100 km2), and isolated by deep water or sand. Using effective MPAs with four or five key features as an unfished standard, comparisons of underwater survey data from effective MPAs with predictions based on survey data from fished coasts indicate that total fish biomass has declined about two-thirds from historical baselines as a result of fishing. Effective MPAs also had twice as many large (>250 mm total length) fish species per transect, five times more large fish biomass, and fourteen times more shark biomass than fished areas. Most (59%) of the MPAs studied had only one or two key features and were not ecologically distinguishable from fished sites. Our results show that global conservation targets based on area alone will not optimize protection of marine biodiversity. More emphasis is needed on better MPA design, durable management and compliance to ensure that MPAs achieve their desired conservation value. Development of the RLS data set was supported by the former Commonwealth Environment Research Facilities Program, whereas analyses were supported by the Australian Research Council, a Fulbright Visiting Scholarship (to G.J.E.), the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, and the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership funded under the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program. Peer Reviewed 2019-04-23T07:54:53Z 2019-04-23T07:54:53Z 2014-02-13 2019-04-23T07:54:53Z artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 doi: 10.1038/nature13022 issn: 0028-0836 e-issn: 1476-4687 Nature 506: 216-220 (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180360 10.1038/nature13022 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13022 Sí none Springer Nature
institution IPNA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-ipna-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IPNA España
topic Environmental Sciences
Macroecology
Conservation Biology
Environmental Sciences
Macroecology
Conservation Biology
spellingShingle Environmental Sciences
Macroecology
Conservation Biology
Environmental Sciences
Macroecology
Conservation Biology
Edgar, Graham J.
Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
Willis, Trevor J.
Kininmonth, Stuart J.
Baker, Susan C.
Banks, Stuart
Barrett, Neville S.
Becerro, Mikel
Bernard, Anthony T. F.
Berkhout, Just
Buxton, Colin D.
Campbell, Stuart J.
Cooper, Antonia T.
Davey, Marlene
Edgar, Sophie C.
Försterra, Günter
Galván, David E.
Irigoyen, Alejo J.
Kushner, David J.
Moura, Rodrigo
Parnell, P. Ed
Shears, N.
Soler, German
Strain, Elisabeth M. A.
Thomson, Russell J.
Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
description In line with global targets agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the number of marine protected areas (MPAs) is increasing rapidly, yet socio-economic benefits generated by MPAs remain difficult to predict and under debate1,2. MPAs often fail to reach their full potential as a consequence of factors such as illegal harvesting, regulations that legally allow detrimental harvesting, or emigration of animals outside boundaries because of continuous habitat or inadequate size of reserve3,4,5. Here we show that the conservation benefits of 87 MPAs investigated worldwide increase exponentially with the accumulation of five key features: no take, well enforced, old (>10 years), large (>100 km2), and isolated by deep water or sand. Using effective MPAs with four or five key features as an unfished standard, comparisons of underwater survey data from effective MPAs with predictions based on survey data from fished coasts indicate that total fish biomass has declined about two-thirds from historical baselines as a result of fishing. Effective MPAs also had twice as many large (>250 mm total length) fish species per transect, five times more large fish biomass, and fourteen times more shark biomass than fished areas. Most (59%) of the MPAs studied had only one or two key features and were not ecologically distinguishable from fished sites. Our results show that global conservation targets based on area alone will not optimize protection of marine biodiversity. More emphasis is needed on better MPA design, durable management and compliance to ensure that MPAs achieve their desired conservation value.
author2 Australian Research Council
author_facet Australian Research Council
Edgar, Graham J.
Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
Willis, Trevor J.
Kininmonth, Stuart J.
Baker, Susan C.
Banks, Stuart
Barrett, Neville S.
Becerro, Mikel
Bernard, Anthony T. F.
Berkhout, Just
Buxton, Colin D.
Campbell, Stuart J.
Cooper, Antonia T.
Davey, Marlene
Edgar, Sophie C.
Försterra, Günter
Galván, David E.
Irigoyen, Alejo J.
Kushner, David J.
Moura, Rodrigo
Parnell, P. Ed
Shears, N.
Soler, German
Strain, Elisabeth M. A.
Thomson, Russell J.
format artículo
topic_facet Environmental Sciences
Macroecology
Conservation Biology
author Edgar, Graham J.
Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
Willis, Trevor J.
Kininmonth, Stuart J.
Baker, Susan C.
Banks, Stuart
Barrett, Neville S.
Becerro, Mikel
Bernard, Anthony T. F.
Berkhout, Just
Buxton, Colin D.
Campbell, Stuart J.
Cooper, Antonia T.
Davey, Marlene
Edgar, Sophie C.
Försterra, Günter
Galván, David E.
Irigoyen, Alejo J.
Kushner, David J.
Moura, Rodrigo
Parnell, P. Ed
Shears, N.
Soler, German
Strain, Elisabeth M. A.
Thomson, Russell J.
author_sort Edgar, Graham J.
title Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
title_short Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
title_full Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
title_fullStr Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
title_full_unstemmed Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
title_sort global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
publisher Springer Nature
publishDate 2014-02-13
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180360
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923
work_keys_str_mv AT edgargrahamj globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT stuartsmithrickd globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT willistrevorj globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT kininmonthstuartj globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT bakersusanc globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT banksstuart globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT barrettnevilles globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT becerromikel globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT bernardanthonytf globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT berkhoutjust globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT buxtoncolind globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT campbellstuartj globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT cooperantoniat globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT daveymarlene globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT edgarsophiec globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT forsterragunter globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT galvandavide globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT irigoyenalejoj globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT kushnerdavidj globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT mourarodrigo globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT parnellped globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT shearsn globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT solergerman globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT strainelisabethma globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
AT thomsonrussellj globalconservationoutcomesdependonmarineprotectedareaswithfivekeyfeatures
_version_ 1777669760963575808