Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment

Summary Costs of reproduction lie at the core of basic ecological and evolutionary theories, and their existence is commonly invoked to explain adaptive processes. Despite their sheer importance, empirical evidence for the existence and quantification of costs of reproduction in tree species comes mostly from correlational studies, while more comprehensive approaches remain missing. Manipulative experiments are a preferred approach to study cost of reproduction, as they allow controlling for otherwise inherent confounding factors like size or genetic background. Here, we conducted a manipulative experiment in a Pinus halepensis common garden, removing developing cones from a group of trees and comparing growth and reproduction after treatment with a control group. We also estimated phenotypic and genetic correlations between reproductive and vegetative traits. Manipulated trees grew slightly more than control trees just after treatment, with just a transient, marginally non-significant difference. By contrast, larger differences were observed for the number of female cones initiated 1 year after treatment, with an increase of 70% more cones in the manipulated group. Phenotypic and genetic correlations showed that smaller trees invested a higher proportion of their resources in reproduction, compared with larger trees, which could be interpreted as an indirect evidence for costs of reproduction. Synthesis. This research showed a high impact of current reproduction on reproductive potential, even when not significant on vegetative growth. This has strong implications for how we understand adaptive strategies in forest trees and should encourage further interest on their still poorly known reproductive life-history traits. © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santos-del-Blanco, L., Climent, J.
Format: journal article biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/4223
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-4223
record_format koha
spelling dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-42232020-12-15T09:54:34Z Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment Santos-del-Blanco, L. Climent, J. Summary Costs of reproduction lie at the core of basic ecological and evolutionary theories, and their existence is commonly invoked to explain adaptive processes. Despite their sheer importance, empirical evidence for the existence and quantification of costs of reproduction in tree species comes mostly from correlational studies, while more comprehensive approaches remain missing. Manipulative experiments are a preferred approach to study cost of reproduction, as they allow controlling for otherwise inherent confounding factors like size or genetic background. Here, we conducted a manipulative experiment in a Pinus halepensis common garden, removing developing cones from a group of trees and comparing growth and reproduction after treatment with a control group. We also estimated phenotypic and genetic correlations between reproductive and vegetative traits. Manipulated trees grew slightly more than control trees just after treatment, with just a transient, marginally non-significant difference. By contrast, larger differences were observed for the number of female cones initiated 1 year after treatment, with an increase of 70% more cones in the manipulated group. Phenotypic and genetic correlations showed that smaller trees invested a higher proportion of their resources in reproduction, compared with larger trees, which could be interpreted as an indirect evidence for costs of reproduction. Synthesis. This research showed a high impact of current reproduction on reproductive potential, even when not significant on vegetative growth. This has strong implications for how we understand adaptive strategies in forest trees and should encourage further interest on their still poorly known reproductive life-history traits. © 2014 British Ecological Society. 2020-10-22T16:30:38Z 2020-10-22T16:30:38Z 2014 journal article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/4223 10.1111/1365-2745.12283 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ open access
institution INIA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inia-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del INIA España
language eng
description Summary Costs of reproduction lie at the core of basic ecological and evolutionary theories, and their existence is commonly invoked to explain adaptive processes. Despite their sheer importance, empirical evidence for the existence and quantification of costs of reproduction in tree species comes mostly from correlational studies, while more comprehensive approaches remain missing. Manipulative experiments are a preferred approach to study cost of reproduction, as they allow controlling for otherwise inherent confounding factors like size or genetic background. Here, we conducted a manipulative experiment in a Pinus halepensis common garden, removing developing cones from a group of trees and comparing growth and reproduction after treatment with a control group. We also estimated phenotypic and genetic correlations between reproductive and vegetative traits. Manipulated trees grew slightly more than control trees just after treatment, with just a transient, marginally non-significant difference. By contrast, larger differences were observed for the number of female cones initiated 1 year after treatment, with an increase of 70% more cones in the manipulated group. Phenotypic and genetic correlations showed that smaller trees invested a higher proportion of their resources in reproduction, compared with larger trees, which could be interpreted as an indirect evidence for costs of reproduction. Synthesis. This research showed a high impact of current reproduction on reproductive potential, even when not significant on vegetative growth. This has strong implications for how we understand adaptive strategies in forest trees and should encourage further interest on their still poorly known reproductive life-history traits. © 2014 British Ecological Society.
format journal article
author Santos-del-Blanco, L.
Climent, J.
spellingShingle Santos-del-Blanco, L.
Climent, J.
Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment
author_facet Santos-del-Blanco, L.
Climent, J.
author_sort Santos-del-Blanco, L.
title Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment
title_short Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment
title_full Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment
title_fullStr Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment
title_full_unstemmed Costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree A whole-tree level assessment
title_sort costs of female reproduction in a conifer tree a whole-tree level assessment
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/4223
work_keys_str_mv AT santosdelblancol costsoffemalereproductioninaconifertreeawholetreelevelassessment
AT climentj costsoffemalereproductioninaconifertreeawholetreelevelassessment
_version_ 1758005082104791040