Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows

Current study determined, in sows, the accuracy of ultrasonography for in vivo (n = 8) and ex vivo (n = 7) evaluation of corpora lutea (CLs) and follicles ≥1.5 mm in size, by comparison with macroscopic findings in sliced ovaries. The accuracy for ex vivo detection of follicles increased with follicle size (P < 0.05), being low for 1.5-1.9 mm follicles (65.9%) and higher for ≥6 mm follicles (93.3%); differences between ultrasonographic and macroscopic observations were significant only for follicles smaller than 3.9 mm (P < 0.05), due to underestimation. Ex vivo observation succeeded to detect presence or absence of CLs in all the ovaries; the efficiency for determining the exact number of CLs being 94.4%. The accuracy for in vivo detection of follicles also increased with follicle size (P < 0.05), dropping to values lower than 40% for 1.5-1.9 mm follicles; therefore, there were significant differences between ultrasonographic and macroscopic observations (P < 0.05). On the other hand, accuracy remained around 92% for ≥6 mm follicles. Ultrasonography was useful again for detecting presence of CLs in all the ovaries; the efficiency for determining CLs number reached 86.7%, due to underestimation in ovaries with higher number of CLs (P < 0.05). Overall, there were no significant differences when comparing the accuracy of ex vivo and in vivo scannings for determination neither of the number of follicles in each size-category larger than 1.9 mm nor of the presence of ovulations or of the CLs number in each ovary. In conclusion, the use of ultrasonography allows an accurate detection of the presence and number of CLs and follicles ≥2 mm of diameter in sows, without significant differences between in vivo and ex vivo observations. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonzalez-Añover, P., Encinas, T., Gomez-Izquierdo, E., Sanz, E., Sanchez-Sanchez, R., Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.
Format: journal article biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1877
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-1877
record_format koha
spelling dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-18772020-12-15T09:46:24Z Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows Gonzalez-Añover, P. Encinas, T. Gomez-Izquierdo, E. Sanz, E. Sanchez-Sanchez, R. Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. Current study determined, in sows, the accuracy of ultrasonography for in vivo (n = 8) and ex vivo (n = 7) evaluation of corpora lutea (CLs) and follicles ≥1.5 mm in size, by comparison with macroscopic findings in sliced ovaries. The accuracy for ex vivo detection of follicles increased with follicle size (P < 0.05), being low for 1.5-1.9 mm follicles (65.9%) and higher for ≥6 mm follicles (93.3%); differences between ultrasonographic and macroscopic observations were significant only for follicles smaller than 3.9 mm (P < 0.05), due to underestimation. Ex vivo observation succeeded to detect presence or absence of CLs in all the ovaries; the efficiency for determining the exact number of CLs being 94.4%. The accuracy for in vivo detection of follicles also increased with follicle size (P < 0.05), dropping to values lower than 40% for 1.5-1.9 mm follicles; therefore, there were significant differences between ultrasonographic and macroscopic observations (P < 0.05). On the other hand, accuracy remained around 92% for ≥6 mm follicles. Ultrasonography was useful again for detecting presence of CLs in all the ovaries; the efficiency for determining CLs number reached 86.7%, due to underestimation in ovaries with higher number of CLs (P < 0.05). Overall, there were no significant differences when comparing the accuracy of ex vivo and in vivo scannings for determination neither of the number of follicles in each size-category larger than 1.9 mm nor of the presence of ovulations or of the CLs number in each ovary. In conclusion, the use of ultrasonography allows an accurate detection of the presence and number of CLs and follicles ≥2 mm of diameter in sows, without significant differences between in vivo and ex vivo observations. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2020-10-22T12:18:01Z 2020-10-22T12:18:01Z 2009 journal article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1877 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.01.020 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ open access
institution INIA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inia-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del INIA España
language eng
description Current study determined, in sows, the accuracy of ultrasonography for in vivo (n = 8) and ex vivo (n = 7) evaluation of corpora lutea (CLs) and follicles ≥1.5 mm in size, by comparison with macroscopic findings in sliced ovaries. The accuracy for ex vivo detection of follicles increased with follicle size (P < 0.05), being low for 1.5-1.9 mm follicles (65.9%) and higher for ≥6 mm follicles (93.3%); differences between ultrasonographic and macroscopic observations were significant only for follicles smaller than 3.9 mm (P < 0.05), due to underestimation. Ex vivo observation succeeded to detect presence or absence of CLs in all the ovaries; the efficiency for determining the exact number of CLs being 94.4%. The accuracy for in vivo detection of follicles also increased with follicle size (P < 0.05), dropping to values lower than 40% for 1.5-1.9 mm follicles; therefore, there were significant differences between ultrasonographic and macroscopic observations (P < 0.05). On the other hand, accuracy remained around 92% for ≥6 mm follicles. Ultrasonography was useful again for detecting presence of CLs in all the ovaries; the efficiency for determining CLs number reached 86.7%, due to underestimation in ovaries with higher number of CLs (P < 0.05). Overall, there were no significant differences when comparing the accuracy of ex vivo and in vivo scannings for determination neither of the number of follicles in each size-category larger than 1.9 mm nor of the presence of ovulations or of the CLs number in each ovary. In conclusion, the use of ultrasonography allows an accurate detection of the presence and number of CLs and follicles ≥2 mm of diameter in sows, without significant differences between in vivo and ex vivo observations. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
format journal article
author Gonzalez-Añover, P.
Encinas, T.
Gomez-Izquierdo, E.
Sanz, E.
Sanchez-Sanchez, R.
Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.
spellingShingle Gonzalez-Añover, P.
Encinas, T.
Gomez-Izquierdo, E.
Sanz, E.
Sanchez-Sanchez, R.
Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.
Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows
author_facet Gonzalez-Añover, P.
Encinas, T.
Gomez-Izquierdo, E.
Sanz, E.
Sanchez-Sanchez, R.
Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.
author_sort Gonzalez-Añover, P.
title Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows
title_short Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows
title_full Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows
title_fullStr Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows
title_sort accuracy of in vivo and ex vivo ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in sows
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1877
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezanoverp accuracyofinvivoandexvivoultrasonographicevaluationofovarianfolliclesandcorporaluteainsows
AT encinast accuracyofinvivoandexvivoultrasonographicevaluationofovarianfolliclesandcorporaluteainsows
AT gomezizquierdoe accuracyofinvivoandexvivoultrasonographicevaluationofovarianfolliclesandcorporaluteainsows
AT sanze accuracyofinvivoandexvivoultrasonographicevaluationofovarianfolliclesandcorporaluteainsows
AT sanchezsanchezr accuracyofinvivoandexvivoultrasonographicevaluationofovarianfolliclesandcorporaluteainsows
AT gonzalezbulnesa accuracyofinvivoandexvivoultrasonographicevaluationofovarianfolliclesandcorporaluteainsows
_version_ 1758005182365433856