Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review

Thermal-optical analysis is currently under consideration by the European standardization body (CEN) as the reference method to quantitatively determine organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) in ambient air. This paper presents an overview of the critical parameters related to the thermal-optical analysis including thermal protocols, critical factors and interferences of the methods examined, method inter-comparisons, inter-laboratory exercises, biases and artifacts, and reference materials. The most commonly used thermal protocols include NIOSH-like, IMPROVE_A and EUSAAR_2 protocols either with light transmittance or reflectance correction for charring. All thermal evolution protocols are comparable for total carbon (TC) concentrations but the results vary significantly concerning OC and especially EC concentrations. Thermal protocols with a rather low peak temperature in the inert mode like IMPROVE_A and EUSAAR_2 tend to classify more carbon as EC compared to NIOSH-like protocols, while charring correction based on transmittance usually leads to smaller EC values compared to reflectance. The difference between reflectance and transmittance correction tends to be larger than the difference between different thermal protocols. Nevertheless, thermal protocols seem to correlate better when reflectance is used as charring correction method. The difference between EC values as determined by the different protocols is not only dependent on the optical pyrolysis correction method, but also on the chemical properties of the samples due to different contributions from various sources. The overall conclusion from this literature review is that it is not possible to identify the "best" thermal-optical protocol based on literature data only, although differences attributed to the methods have been quantified when possible.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karanasiou, Angeliki, Minguillón, María Cruz, Viana, Mar, Alastuey, Andrés, Putaud, Jean-Philippe, Maenhaut, Willy, Panteliadis, P., Močnik, G., Favez, O., Kuhlbusch, Thomas A. J.
Other Authors: European Commission
Format: artículo biblioteca
Language:English
Published: European Geosciences Union 2015-09-16
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/128761
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-idaea-es-10261-128761
record_format koha
spelling dig-idaea-es-10261-1287612020-07-07T08:16:12Z Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review Karanasiou, Angeliki Minguillón, María Cruz Viana, Mar Alastuey, Andrés Putaud, Jean-Philippe Maenhaut, Willy Panteliadis, P. Močnik, G. Favez, O. Kuhlbusch, Thomas A. J. European Commission Thermal-optical analysis is currently under consideration by the European standardization body (CEN) as the reference method to quantitatively determine organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) in ambient air. This paper presents an overview of the critical parameters related to the thermal-optical analysis including thermal protocols, critical factors and interferences of the methods examined, method inter-comparisons, inter-laboratory exercises, biases and artifacts, and reference materials. The most commonly used thermal protocols include NIOSH-like, IMPROVE_A and EUSAAR_2 protocols either with light transmittance or reflectance correction for charring. All thermal evolution protocols are comparable for total carbon (TC) concentrations but the results vary significantly concerning OC and especially EC concentrations. Thermal protocols with a rather low peak temperature in the inert mode like IMPROVE_A and EUSAAR_2 tend to classify more carbon as EC compared to NIOSH-like protocols, while charring correction based on transmittance usually leads to smaller EC values compared to reflectance. The difference between reflectance and transmittance correction tends to be larger than the difference between different thermal protocols. Nevertheless, thermal protocols seem to correlate better when reflectance is used as charring correction method. The difference between EC values as determined by the different protocols is not only dependent on the optical pyrolysis correction method, but also on the chemical properties of the samples due to different contributions from various sources. The overall conclusion from this literature review is that it is not possible to identify the "best" thermal-optical protocol based on literature data only, although differences attributed to the methods have been quantified when possible. This work was undertaken under Mandate M/503 “Standardisation mandate to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in support of the implementation of the Ambient Air Quality Legislation”, ENX “Ambient air – Measurement of airborne lemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in PM 2.5 deposited on filters”. EUR 1,920 APC fee funded by the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot Peer reviewed 2016-02-05T09:49:12Z 2016-02-05T09:49:12Z 2015-09-16 artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions 8: 9649-9712 (2015) 1867-8610 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/128761 10.5194/amtd-8-9649-2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780 en #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/265116 FP7 post-grant Gold Open Access Pilot Publisher's version http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-9649-2015 Sí open European Geosciences Union
institution IDAEA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-idaea-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IDAEA España
language English
description Thermal-optical analysis is currently under consideration by the European standardization body (CEN) as the reference method to quantitatively determine organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) in ambient air. This paper presents an overview of the critical parameters related to the thermal-optical analysis including thermal protocols, critical factors and interferences of the methods examined, method inter-comparisons, inter-laboratory exercises, biases and artifacts, and reference materials. The most commonly used thermal protocols include NIOSH-like, IMPROVE_A and EUSAAR_2 protocols either with light transmittance or reflectance correction for charring. All thermal evolution protocols are comparable for total carbon (TC) concentrations but the results vary significantly concerning OC and especially EC concentrations. Thermal protocols with a rather low peak temperature in the inert mode like IMPROVE_A and EUSAAR_2 tend to classify more carbon as EC compared to NIOSH-like protocols, while charring correction based on transmittance usually leads to smaller EC values compared to reflectance. The difference between reflectance and transmittance correction tends to be larger than the difference between different thermal protocols. Nevertheless, thermal protocols seem to correlate better when reflectance is used as charring correction method. The difference between EC values as determined by the different protocols is not only dependent on the optical pyrolysis correction method, but also on the chemical properties of the samples due to different contributions from various sources. The overall conclusion from this literature review is that it is not possible to identify the "best" thermal-optical protocol based on literature data only, although differences attributed to the methods have been quantified when possible.
author2 European Commission
author_facet European Commission
Karanasiou, Angeliki
Minguillón, María Cruz
Viana, Mar
Alastuey, Andrés
Putaud, Jean-Philippe
Maenhaut, Willy
Panteliadis, P.
Močnik, G.
Favez, O.
Kuhlbusch, Thomas A. J.
format artículo
author Karanasiou, Angeliki
Minguillón, María Cruz
Viana, Mar
Alastuey, Andrés
Putaud, Jean-Philippe
Maenhaut, Willy
Panteliadis, P.
Močnik, G.
Favez, O.
Kuhlbusch, Thomas A. J.
spellingShingle Karanasiou, Angeliki
Minguillón, María Cruz
Viana, Mar
Alastuey, Andrés
Putaud, Jean-Philippe
Maenhaut, Willy
Panteliadis, P.
Močnik, G.
Favez, O.
Kuhlbusch, Thomas A. J.
Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review
author_sort Karanasiou, Angeliki
title Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review
title_short Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review
title_full Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review
title_fullStr Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review
title_sort thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (ec) and organic carbon (oc) in ambient air a literature review
publisher European Geosciences Union
publishDate 2015-09-16
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/128761
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780
work_keys_str_mv AT karanasiouangeliki thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT minguillonmariacruz thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT vianamar thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT alastueyandres thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT putaudjeanphilippe thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT maenhautwilly thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT panteliadisp thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT mocnikg thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT favezo thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
AT kuhlbuschthomasaj thermalopticalanalysisforthemeasurementofelementalcarbonecandorganiccarbonocinambientairaliteraturereview
_version_ 1777669269951086592