Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine

[Background] This study determined the evolution of pyrimethanil, a fungicide commonly used to control Botrytis cinerea, throughout the winemaking process in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine. Tempranillo grapevines were treated with pyrimethanil according to both good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Critical Agricultural Practices (CAP). Fermentation was carried out in an experimental winery. Grape analysis was based on an ethyl acetate extraction method. Samples from fermentation were analysed by solid phase extraction. The determination was carried out by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC-NPD) and additionally confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). [Results] Pyrimethanil residues were at least ten times greater in grapes treated 7 days before harvest than in those treated respecting the safety period (21 days). The amount of pyrimethanil in grapes treated under GAP was below the maximum residue limit (5 mg kg-1). The level of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation in both treatments. In the fermentation of grapes treated according to CAP, the pyrimethanil concentration was reduced by over 50% on the first day and then remained constant until the end of the fermentation process. For grapes treated in compliance with GAP, the amount of pyrimethanil decreased to a level below the limit of detection in the bottled wine. [Conclusion] The described methods for grapes, must, fermenting must and wine gave good recoveries, linearity, precision and accuracy. They were also highly sensitive in avoiding matrix effects. Pyrimethanil residues found in treated grapes were higher in skin than in pulp. The amount of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation by degradation and/or adsorption. For grapes treated according to GAP, residues disappeared in the final bottled wine. The decrease observed in the final bottled wine may be caused by diverse oenological practices and technologies such us malolactic fermentation, racking and settling. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaquero-Fernández, L., Sanz-Asensio, J., Fernández-Zurbano, Purificación, López-Alonso, M., Martínez-Soria, M. T.
Other Authors: Gobierno de La Rioja
Format: artículo biblioteca
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2013-06
Subjects:Dissipation, Winemaking process, Grapes, Residues, Pyrimethanil,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/144003
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007652
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-icvv-es-10261-144003
record_format koha
spelling dig-icvv-es-10261-1440032017-02-16T01:54:25Z Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine Vaquero-Fernández, L. Sanz-Asensio, J. Fernández-Zurbano, Purificación López-Alonso, M. Martínez-Soria, M. T. Gobierno de La Rioja Universidad de La Rioja European Commission Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (España) CSIC - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) Dissipation Winemaking process Grapes Residues Pyrimethanil [Background] This study determined the evolution of pyrimethanil, a fungicide commonly used to control Botrytis cinerea, throughout the winemaking process in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine. Tempranillo grapevines were treated with pyrimethanil according to both good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Critical Agricultural Practices (CAP). Fermentation was carried out in an experimental winery. Grape analysis was based on an ethyl acetate extraction method. Samples from fermentation were analysed by solid phase extraction. The determination was carried out by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC-NPD) and additionally confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). [Results] Pyrimethanil residues were at least ten times greater in grapes treated 7 days before harvest than in those treated respecting the safety period (21 days). The amount of pyrimethanil in grapes treated under GAP was below the maximum residue limit (5 mg kg-1). The level of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation in both treatments. In the fermentation of grapes treated according to CAP, the pyrimethanil concentration was reduced by over 50% on the first day and then remained constant until the end of the fermentation process. For grapes treated in compliance with GAP, the amount of pyrimethanil decreased to a level below the limit of detection in the bottled wine. [Conclusion] The described methods for grapes, must, fermenting must and wine gave good recoveries, linearity, precision and accuracy. They were also highly sensitive in avoiding matrix effects. Pyrimethanil residues found in treated grapes were higher in skin than in pulp. The amount of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation by degradation and/or adsorption. For grapes treated according to GAP, residues disappeared in the final bottled wine. The decrease observed in the final bottled wine may be caused by diverse oenological practices and technologies such us malolactic fermentation, racking and settling. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry. The authors want to thank the following: the Government of La Rioja for both the FPI grant given to Luis Vaquero-Fernández and the sponsorship of project ANGI 2004/18; INIA for the infrastructure provided (project VIN00-054-C2-01); and MEC/FEDER for project AGL2005-02313/ALI. The authors would also like to thank the University of La Rioja, Bodegas D. Mateos SL and L.C. Mateo-García (Market Developer of BASF Española, SA). Peer Reviewed 2017-02-15T11:34:11Z 2017-02-15T11:34:11Z 2013-06 2017-02-15T11:34:12Z artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 issn: 0022-5142 e-issn: 1097-0010 Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93(8): 1960-1966 (2013) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/144003 10.1002/jsfa.5998 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007652 http://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5998 Sí none John Wiley & Sons
institution ICVV ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-icvv-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del ICVV España
topic Dissipation
Winemaking process
Grapes
Residues
Pyrimethanil
Dissipation
Winemaking process
Grapes
Residues
Pyrimethanil
spellingShingle Dissipation
Winemaking process
Grapes
Residues
Pyrimethanil
Dissipation
Winemaking process
Grapes
Residues
Pyrimethanil
Vaquero-Fernández, L.
Sanz-Asensio, J.
Fernández-Zurbano, Purificación
López-Alonso, M.
Martínez-Soria, M. T.
Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
description [Background] This study determined the evolution of pyrimethanil, a fungicide commonly used to control Botrytis cinerea, throughout the winemaking process in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine. Tempranillo grapevines were treated with pyrimethanil according to both good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Critical Agricultural Practices (CAP). Fermentation was carried out in an experimental winery. Grape analysis was based on an ethyl acetate extraction method. Samples from fermentation were analysed by solid phase extraction. The determination was carried out by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC-NPD) and additionally confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). [Results] Pyrimethanil residues were at least ten times greater in grapes treated 7 days before harvest than in those treated respecting the safety period (21 days). The amount of pyrimethanil in grapes treated under GAP was below the maximum residue limit (5 mg kg-1). The level of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation in both treatments. In the fermentation of grapes treated according to CAP, the pyrimethanil concentration was reduced by over 50% on the first day and then remained constant until the end of the fermentation process. For grapes treated in compliance with GAP, the amount of pyrimethanil decreased to a level below the limit of detection in the bottled wine. [Conclusion] The described methods for grapes, must, fermenting must and wine gave good recoveries, linearity, precision and accuracy. They were also highly sensitive in avoiding matrix effects. Pyrimethanil residues found in treated grapes were higher in skin than in pulp. The amount of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation by degradation and/or adsorption. For grapes treated according to GAP, residues disappeared in the final bottled wine. The decrease observed in the final bottled wine may be caused by diverse oenological practices and technologies such us malolactic fermentation, racking and settling. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry.
author2 Gobierno de La Rioja
author_facet Gobierno de La Rioja
Vaquero-Fernández, L.
Sanz-Asensio, J.
Fernández-Zurbano, Purificación
López-Alonso, M.
Martínez-Soria, M. T.
format artículo
topic_facet Dissipation
Winemaking process
Grapes
Residues
Pyrimethanil
author Vaquero-Fernández, L.
Sanz-Asensio, J.
Fernández-Zurbano, Purificación
López-Alonso, M.
Martínez-Soria, M. T.
author_sort Vaquero-Fernández, L.
title Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
title_short Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
title_full Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
title_fullStr Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
title_full_unstemmed Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
title_sort determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
publisher John Wiley & Sons
publishDate 2013-06
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/144003
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007652
work_keys_str_mv AT vaquerofernandezl determinationoffungicidepyrimethanilingrapesmustfermentingmustandwine
AT sanzasensioj determinationoffungicidepyrimethanilingrapesmustfermentingmustandwine
AT fernandezzurbanopurificacion determinationoffungicidepyrimethanilingrapesmustfermentingmustandwine
AT lopezalonsom determinationoffungicidepyrimethanilingrapesmustfermentingmustandwine
AT martinezsoriamt determinationoffungicidepyrimethanilingrapesmustfermentingmustandwine
_version_ 1777670860226691072