Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir

The Underground Gas Storage (UGS) project of Castor, Spain, was a strategic project to have a store capacity equivalent to the gas demand of 50 days in Spain. The gas was stored in an offshore formation in which heavy oil was produced in the 1970s and 80s. However, the project was cancelled before entering into operation because a sequence of felt earthquakes was induced as a result of the cushion gas injection. The project cancellation implied an investment compensation to the operating company that may cost up to 4.73 billion euros to Spanish citizens. A striking feature of the induced seismicity was the high magnitude of the earthquakes, containing the three largest earthquakes (M4.08, M4.01 and M3.97) ever induced by any of the more than 640 UGS facilities all around the world. Another striking feature was the delay between the stop of gas injection and the occurrence of the earthquakes. Gas was injected for 15 days and the largest earthquakes were induced 20 days after the stop of injection. Last but not least, the hypocenters of these earthquakes were located between 4 to 10 km, much deeper than the injection depth, placed at 1.7 km. Though an interdisciplinary research combining hydrogeology, geomechanics and seismology, we have proposed a plausible combination of triggering mechanisms that explains these features of the induced seismicity (Vilarrasa et al., 2021). The onset of seismicity was induced by gas injection, which reactivated through pore pressure buildup and buoyancy the critically stressed Amposta fault, a mature fault bounding the storage formation. The Amposta fault crept, accumulating aseismic slip, even after the stop of injection because of the permanent effect of buoyancy caused by the injected gas. This progressive accumulation of slip perturbed the stress around it and eventually reactivated a critically stressed unmapped deep fault. Once this deep fault was reactivated, the sequence of earthquakes was induced by shear slip stress transfer, with transient deformation-induced pore pressure changes likely controlling the delay between earthquakes. An analysis of fault stability prior to gas injection would have identified the high risk of inducing seismicity at Castor.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vilarrasa, Víctor, De Simone, Silvia, Carrera, Jesús, Villaseñor, Antonio
Format: comunicación de congreso biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:Induced Seismicity, Castor,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/261480
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-icm-es-10261-261480
record_format koha
spelling dig-icm-es-10261-2614802022-06-03T11:22:50Z Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir Vilarrasa, Víctor De Simone, Silvia Carrera, Jesús Villaseñor, Antonio Induced Seismicity Castor The Underground Gas Storage (UGS) project of Castor, Spain, was a strategic project to have a store capacity equivalent to the gas demand of 50 days in Spain. The gas was stored in an offshore formation in which heavy oil was produced in the 1970s and 80s. However, the project was cancelled before entering into operation because a sequence of felt earthquakes was induced as a result of the cushion gas injection. The project cancellation implied an investment compensation to the operating company that may cost up to 4.73 billion euros to Spanish citizens. A striking feature of the induced seismicity was the high magnitude of the earthquakes, containing the three largest earthquakes (M4.08, M4.01 and M3.97) ever induced by any of the more than 640 UGS facilities all around the world. Another striking feature was the delay between the stop of gas injection and the occurrence of the earthquakes. Gas was injected for 15 days and the largest earthquakes were induced 20 days after the stop of injection. Last but not least, the hypocenters of these earthquakes were located between 4 to 10 km, much deeper than the injection depth, placed at 1.7 km. Though an interdisciplinary research combining hydrogeology, geomechanics and seismology, we have proposed a plausible combination of triggering mechanisms that explains these features of the induced seismicity (Vilarrasa et al., 2021). The onset of seismicity was induced by gas injection, which reactivated through pore pressure buildup and buoyancy the critically stressed Amposta fault, a mature fault bounding the storage formation. The Amposta fault crept, accumulating aseismic slip, even after the stop of injection because of the permanent effect of buoyancy caused by the injected gas. This progressive accumulation of slip perturbed the stress around it and eventually reactivated a critically stressed unmapped deep fault. Once this deep fault was reactivated, the sequence of earthquakes was induced by shear slip stress transfer, with transient deformation-induced pore pressure changes likely controlling the delay between earthquakes. An analysis of fault stability prior to gas injection would have identified the high risk of inducing seismicity at Castor. Peer reviewed 2022-02-22T09:32:59Z 2022-02-22T09:32:59Z 2021 comunicación de congreso http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/261480 en Sí open
institution ICM ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-icm-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del ICM España
language English
topic Induced Seismicity
Castor
Induced Seismicity
Castor
spellingShingle Induced Seismicity
Castor
Induced Seismicity
Castor
Vilarrasa, Víctor
De Simone, Silvia
Carrera, Jesús
Villaseñor, Antonio
Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir
description The Underground Gas Storage (UGS) project of Castor, Spain, was a strategic project to have a store capacity equivalent to the gas demand of 50 days in Spain. The gas was stored in an offshore formation in which heavy oil was produced in the 1970s and 80s. However, the project was cancelled before entering into operation because a sequence of felt earthquakes was induced as a result of the cushion gas injection. The project cancellation implied an investment compensation to the operating company that may cost up to 4.73 billion euros to Spanish citizens. A striking feature of the induced seismicity was the high magnitude of the earthquakes, containing the three largest earthquakes (M4.08, M4.01 and M3.97) ever induced by any of the more than 640 UGS facilities all around the world. Another striking feature was the delay between the stop of gas injection and the occurrence of the earthquakes. Gas was injected for 15 days and the largest earthquakes were induced 20 days after the stop of injection. Last but not least, the hypocenters of these earthquakes were located between 4 to 10 km, much deeper than the injection depth, placed at 1.7 km. Though an interdisciplinary research combining hydrogeology, geomechanics and seismology, we have proposed a plausible combination of triggering mechanisms that explains these features of the induced seismicity (Vilarrasa et al., 2021). The onset of seismicity was induced by gas injection, which reactivated through pore pressure buildup and buoyancy the critically stressed Amposta fault, a mature fault bounding the storage formation. The Amposta fault crept, accumulating aseismic slip, even after the stop of injection because of the permanent effect of buoyancy caused by the injected gas. This progressive accumulation of slip perturbed the stress around it and eventually reactivated a critically stressed unmapped deep fault. Once this deep fault was reactivated, the sequence of earthquakes was induced by shear slip stress transfer, with transient deformation-induced pore pressure changes likely controlling the delay between earthquakes. An analysis of fault stability prior to gas injection would have identified the high risk of inducing seismicity at Castor.
format comunicación de congreso
topic_facet Induced Seismicity
Castor
author Vilarrasa, Víctor
De Simone, Silvia
Carrera, Jesús
Villaseñor, Antonio
author_facet Vilarrasa, Víctor
De Simone, Silvia
Carrera, Jesús
Villaseñor, Antonio
author_sort Vilarrasa, Víctor
title Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir
title_short Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir
title_full Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir
title_fullStr Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir
title_full_unstemmed Induced seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir
title_sort induced seismicity at the castor gas reservoir
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/261480
work_keys_str_mv AT vilarrasavictor inducedseismicityatthecastorgasreservoir
AT desimonesilvia inducedseismicityatthecastorgasreservoir
AT carrerajesus inducedseismicityatthecastorgasreservoir
AT villasenorantonio inducedseismicityatthecastorgasreservoir
_version_ 1777667655569768448