Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
Results obtained in the determination of sensory thresholds with three different simplified methods were compared. The methods were: a modification of the ascending method of limits (1), one based on the method of the constant stimuli (2), and one based on the use of scales (3). The study was carried out on two sensorially simple systems, sucrose and aspartame aqueous solutions. The thresholds values for sucrose obtained by method 1 (1.41 g/L) and by method 2 (1.60 g/L) were similar and within the range obtained by method 3 (0.6–1.6 g/L). For aspartame the values obtained with methods 1 and 2 were also similar (0.004 and 0.005 g/L, respectively), but they were below the minimum value of the corresponding range (0.008–0.016 g/L) calculated with method 3. These results suggest that the sensory methods provoked less variability in thresholds values than other noncontrolled factors. The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed considering: experimental work, precision of results and practical validity.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | artículo biblioteca |
Published: |
John Wiley & Sons
1994-12
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/331405 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-iata-es-10261-331405 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-iata-es-10261-3314052023-07-20T11:56:59Z Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances Costell Ibáñez, Elvira Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta Izquierdo Faubel, Luis Durán, Luis Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España) Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (España) Results obtained in the determination of sensory thresholds with three different simplified methods were compared. The methods were: a modification of the ascending method of limits (1), one based on the method of the constant stimuli (2), and one based on the use of scales (3). The study was carried out on two sensorially simple systems, sucrose and aspartame aqueous solutions. The thresholds values for sucrose obtained by method 1 (1.41 g/L) and by method 2 (1.60 g/L) were similar and within the range obtained by method 3 (0.6–1.6 g/L). For aspartame the values obtained with methods 1 and 2 were also similar (0.004 and 0.005 g/L, respectively), but they were below the minimum value of the corresponding range (0.008–0.016 g/L) calculated with method 3. These results suggest that the sensory methods provoked less variability in thresholds values than other noncontrolled factors. The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed considering: experimental work, precision of results and practical validity. The authors are indebted to the ClCyT for financial support (project ALI 91–0395) and to the Ministerio de Educatión y Ciencia of Spain for the fellowship awarded to author M.V. Pastor. This work is part of her PhD Thesis. The authors express their thanks to Industrial Kern Española S.A. for supplying aspartame. 2023-07-19T11:40:02Z 2023-07-19T11:40:02Z 1994-12 2023-07-19T11:40:02Z artículo doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1994.tb00254.x issn: 0887-8250 e-issn: 1745-459X Journal of Sensory Studies 9(4): 365-382 (1994) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/331405 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1994.tb00254.x Sí none John Wiley & Sons |
institution |
IATA ES |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
España |
countrycode |
ES |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-iata-es |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del IATA España |
description |
Results obtained in the determination of sensory thresholds with three different simplified methods were compared. The methods were: a modification of the ascending method of limits (1), one based on the method of the constant stimuli (2), and one based on the use of scales (3). The study was carried out on two sensorially simple systems, sucrose and aspartame aqueous solutions. The thresholds values for sucrose obtained by method 1 (1.41 g/L) and by method 2 (1.60 g/L) were similar and within the range obtained by method 3 (0.6–1.6 g/L). For aspartame the values obtained with methods 1 and 2 were also similar (0.004 and 0.005 g/L, respectively), but they were below the minimum value of the corresponding range (0.008–0.016 g/L) calculated with method 3. These results suggest that the sensory methods provoked less variability in thresholds values than other noncontrolled factors. The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed considering: experimental work, precision of results and practical validity. |
author2 |
Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España) |
author_facet |
Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España) Costell Ibáñez, Elvira Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta Izquierdo Faubel, Luis Durán, Luis |
format |
artículo |
author |
Costell Ibáñez, Elvira Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta Izquierdo Faubel, Luis Durán, Luis |
spellingShingle |
Costell Ibáñez, Elvira Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta Izquierdo Faubel, Luis Durán, Luis Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances |
author_sort |
Costell Ibáñez, Elvira |
title |
Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances |
title_short |
Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances |
title_full |
Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances |
title_sort |
comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances |
publisher |
John Wiley & Sons |
publishDate |
1994-12 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/331405 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT costellibanezelvira comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances AT pastorcastillomvicenta comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances AT izquierdofaubelluis comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances AT duranluis comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances |
_version_ |
1777670279690977280 |