Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances

Results obtained in the determination of sensory thresholds with three different simplified methods were compared. The methods were: a modification of the ascending method of limits (1), one based on the method of the constant stimuli (2), and one based on the use of scales (3). The study was carried out on two sensorially simple systems, sucrose and aspartame aqueous solutions. The thresholds values for sucrose obtained by method 1 (1.41 g/L) and by method 2 (1.60 g/L) were similar and within the range obtained by method 3 (0.6–1.6 g/L). For aspartame the values obtained with methods 1 and 2 were also similar (0.004 and 0.005 g/L, respectively), but they were below the minimum value of the corresponding range (0.008–0.016 g/L) calculated with method 3. These results suggest that the sensory methods provoked less variability in thresholds values than other noncontrolled factors. The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed considering: experimental work, precision of results and practical validity.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Costell Ibáñez, Elvira, Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta, Izquierdo Faubel, Luis, Durán, Luis
Other Authors: Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España)
Format: artículo biblioteca
Published: John Wiley & Sons 1994-12
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/331405
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-iata-es-10261-331405
record_format koha
spelling dig-iata-es-10261-3314052023-07-20T11:56:59Z Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances Costell Ibáñez, Elvira Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta Izquierdo Faubel, Luis Durán, Luis Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España) Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (España) Results obtained in the determination of sensory thresholds with three different simplified methods were compared. The methods were: a modification of the ascending method of limits (1), one based on the method of the constant stimuli (2), and one based on the use of scales (3). The study was carried out on two sensorially simple systems, sucrose and aspartame aqueous solutions. The thresholds values for sucrose obtained by method 1 (1.41 g/L) and by method 2 (1.60 g/L) were similar and within the range obtained by method 3 (0.6–1.6 g/L). For aspartame the values obtained with methods 1 and 2 were also similar (0.004 and 0.005 g/L, respectively), but they were below the minimum value of the corresponding range (0.008–0.016 g/L) calculated with method 3. These results suggest that the sensory methods provoked less variability in thresholds values than other noncontrolled factors. The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed considering: experimental work, precision of results and practical validity. The authors are indebted to the ClCyT for financial support (project ALI 91–0395) and to the Ministerio de Educatión y Ciencia of Spain for the fellowship awarded to author M.V. Pastor. This work is part of her PhD Thesis. The authors express their thanks to Industrial Kern Española S.A. for supplying aspartame. 2023-07-19T11:40:02Z 2023-07-19T11:40:02Z 1994-12 2023-07-19T11:40:02Z artículo doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1994.tb00254.x issn: 0887-8250 e-issn: 1745-459X Journal of Sensory Studies 9(4): 365-382 (1994) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/331405 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1994.tb00254.x Sí none John Wiley & Sons
institution IATA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-iata-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IATA España
description Results obtained in the determination of sensory thresholds with three different simplified methods were compared. The methods were: a modification of the ascending method of limits (1), one based on the method of the constant stimuli (2), and one based on the use of scales (3). The study was carried out on two sensorially simple systems, sucrose and aspartame aqueous solutions. The thresholds values for sucrose obtained by method 1 (1.41 g/L) and by method 2 (1.60 g/L) were similar and within the range obtained by method 3 (0.6–1.6 g/L). For aspartame the values obtained with methods 1 and 2 were also similar (0.004 and 0.005 g/L, respectively), but they were below the minimum value of the corresponding range (0.008–0.016 g/L) calculated with method 3. These results suggest that the sensory methods provoked less variability in thresholds values than other noncontrolled factors. The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed considering: experimental work, precision of results and practical validity.
author2 Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España)
author_facet Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España)
Costell Ibáñez, Elvira
Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta
Izquierdo Faubel, Luis
Durán, Luis
format artículo
author Costell Ibáñez, Elvira
Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta
Izquierdo Faubel, Luis
Durán, Luis
spellingShingle Costell Ibáñez, Elvira
Pastor Castillo, M. Vicenta
Izquierdo Faubel, Luis
Durán, Luis
Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
author_sort Costell Ibáñez, Elvira
title Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
title_short Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
title_full Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
title_fullStr Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
title_sort comparison of simplified methods for evaluation of sensory thresholds of added substances
publisher John Wiley & Sons
publishDate 1994-12
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/331405
work_keys_str_mv AT costellibanezelvira comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances
AT pastorcastillomvicenta comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances
AT izquierdofaubelluis comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances
AT duranluis comparisonofsimplifiedmethodsforevaluationofsensorythresholdsofaddedsubstances
_version_ 1777670279690977280