Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel

Purpose: To provide, through a set of indicators, an overview of the way in which Spanish institutional repositories are run and the services they offer their respective institutions and other users. The selected descriptors are based on aspects related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and the personnel responsible for managing repositories. Design, methodology and approach: In order to establish the indicators, a thorough review of the literature was carried out to identify existing indicators that are used to assess repositories. These were divided into five categories (technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel) with a total of 48 components. An online survey was conducted with the repositories managers of 66 Spanish research institutions in order to verify the degree of fulfilment of the selected indicators. Findings: The survey received forty-six responses, which represented a response rate of 69%. Of these, 44 came from universities and two from research centres. Sixty-five per cent of the repositories have the capacity to import data from and export data to other university systems, mainly CRIS (32%). Most repositories have mechanisms for the large-scale import and export of metadata and digital objects (83%). The use of altmetrics in repositories is widespread (44%). Authors and librarians deposit most frequently (37% and 32%, respectively), in spite of the fact that 44% do not have full-time staff working in the repository. In more than 80% of the repositories, between 90% and 100% of the deposits are full-text documents. With respect to the tools used to promote the repository within the institution, these are primarily face-to-face training sessions (82%), followed by support materials such as manuals and help pages (65%). The academic authorities encourage open access among researchers in 56% of cases, a significant element in repository marketing. Originality and value: This work proposes a model based on five dimensions and 48 indicators to assess institutional repositories. This approach has been applied to Spanish institutional repositories to provide up-to-date information about their management procedures and promotional methods and the services they offer authors and the university community. This overview of Spanish repositories has provided an insight into the way in which repositories have evolved in recent years and allowed potential improvements to be identified based on the most advanced repositories. This model can also be exported to assess institutional repositories in other countries.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serrano-Vicente, R., Melero, Remedios, Abadal, E.
Other Authors: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
Format: artículo biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Publishing 2018-08
Subjects:repositorios insitucionales, Criterios de evaluación, Open Access, Acceso abierto, gestión repsoitorios,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/168591
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-iata-es-10261-168591
record_format koha
spelling dig-iata-es-10261-1685912018-08-11T00:55:49Z Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel Serrano-Vicente, R. Melero, Remedios Abadal, E. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España) Melero, Remedios [0000-0002-1813-8783] repositorios insitucionales Criterios de evaluación Open Access Acceso abierto gestión repsoitorios Purpose: To provide, through a set of indicators, an overview of the way in which Spanish institutional repositories are run and the services they offer their respective institutions and other users. The selected descriptors are based on aspects related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and the personnel responsible for managing repositories. Design, methodology and approach: In order to establish the indicators, a thorough review of the literature was carried out to identify existing indicators that are used to assess repositories. These were divided into five categories (technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel) with a total of 48 components. An online survey was conducted with the repositories managers of 66 Spanish research institutions in order to verify the degree of fulfilment of the selected indicators. Findings: The survey received forty-six responses, which represented a response rate of 69%. Of these, 44 came from universities and two from research centres. Sixty-five per cent of the repositories have the capacity to import data from and export data to other university systems, mainly CRIS (32%). Most repositories have mechanisms for the large-scale import and export of metadata and digital objects (83%). The use of altmetrics in repositories is widespread (44%). Authors and librarians deposit most frequently (37% and 32%, respectively), in spite of the fact that 44% do not have full-time staff working in the repository. In more than 80% of the repositories, between 90% and 100% of the deposits are full-text documents. With respect to the tools used to promote the repository within the institution, these are primarily face-to-face training sessions (82%), followed by support materials such as manuals and help pages (65%). The academic authorities encourage open access among researchers in 56% of cases, a significant element in repository marketing. Originality and value: This work proposes a model based on five dimensions and 48 indicators to assess institutional repositories. This approach has been applied to Spanish institutional repositories to provide up-to-date information about their management procedures and promotional methods and the services they offer authors and the university community. This overview of Spanish repositories has provided an insight into the way in which repositories have evolved in recent years and allowed potential improvements to be identified based on the most advanced repositories. This model can also be exported to assess institutional repositories in other countries. Proyecto “Open Access to Science in Spain” (CSO2014-52830-P) del Plan Nacional I+D financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Peer reviewed 2018-08-10T12:13:34Z 2018-08-10T12:13:34Z 2018-08 artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Program - Electronic Library and Information Systems 0033-0337 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/168591 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837 en #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# CSO2014-52830-P Postprint https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-10-2017-0074 Sí open Emerald Group Publishing
institution IATA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-iata-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IATA España
language English
topic repositorios insitucionales
Criterios de evaluación
Open Access
Acceso abierto
gestión repsoitorios
repositorios insitucionales
Criterios de evaluación
Open Access
Acceso abierto
gestión repsoitorios
spellingShingle repositorios insitucionales
Criterios de evaluación
Open Access
Acceso abierto
gestión repsoitorios
repositorios insitucionales
Criterios de evaluación
Open Access
Acceso abierto
gestión repsoitorios
Serrano-Vicente, R.
Melero, Remedios
Abadal, E.
Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel
description Purpose: To provide, through a set of indicators, an overview of the way in which Spanish institutional repositories are run and the services they offer their respective institutions and other users. The selected descriptors are based on aspects related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and the personnel responsible for managing repositories. Design, methodology and approach: In order to establish the indicators, a thorough review of the literature was carried out to identify existing indicators that are used to assess repositories. These were divided into five categories (technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel) with a total of 48 components. An online survey was conducted with the repositories managers of 66 Spanish research institutions in order to verify the degree of fulfilment of the selected indicators. Findings: The survey received forty-six responses, which represented a response rate of 69%. Of these, 44 came from universities and two from research centres. Sixty-five per cent of the repositories have the capacity to import data from and export data to other university systems, mainly CRIS (32%). Most repositories have mechanisms for the large-scale import and export of metadata and digital objects (83%). The use of altmetrics in repositories is widespread (44%). Authors and librarians deposit most frequently (37% and 32%, respectively), in spite of the fact that 44% do not have full-time staff working in the repository. In more than 80% of the repositories, between 90% and 100% of the deposits are full-text documents. With respect to the tools used to promote the repository within the institution, these are primarily face-to-face training sessions (82%), followed by support materials such as manuals and help pages (65%). The academic authorities encourage open access among researchers in 56% of cases, a significant element in repository marketing. Originality and value: This work proposes a model based on five dimensions and 48 indicators to assess institutional repositories. This approach has been applied to Spanish institutional repositories to provide up-to-date information about their management procedures and promotional methods and the services they offer authors and the university community. This overview of Spanish repositories has provided an insight into the way in which repositories have evolved in recent years and allowed potential improvements to be identified based on the most advanced repositories. This model can also be exported to assess institutional repositories in other countries.
author2 Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
author_facet Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
Serrano-Vicente, R.
Melero, Remedios
Abadal, E.
format artículo
topic_facet repositorios insitucionales
Criterios de evaluación
Open Access
Acceso abierto
gestión repsoitorios
author Serrano-Vicente, R.
Melero, Remedios
Abadal, E.
author_sort Serrano-Vicente, R.
title Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel
title_short Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel
title_full Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel
title_fullStr Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel
title_sort evaluation of spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel
publisher Emerald Group Publishing
publishDate 2018-08
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/168591
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837
work_keys_str_mv AT serranovicenter evaluationofspanishinstitutionalrepositoriesbasedoncriteriarelatedtotechnologyprocedurescontentmarketingandpersonnel
AT meleroremedios evaluationofspanishinstitutionalrepositoriesbasedoncriteriarelatedtotechnologyprocedurescontentmarketingandpersonnel
AT abadale evaluationofspanishinstitutionalrepositoriesbasedoncriteriarelatedtotechnologyprocedurescontentmarketingandpersonnel
_version_ 1777670063255453696