The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa
This report synthesizes the analysis and findings of a set of seven country impact evaluation studies that explore the impact of cash transfer programmes on household economic decision-making, productive activities and labour allocation in sub-Saharan Africa. The seven countries are Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Results from seven recently completed rigorous impact evaluations of government-run unconditional social cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa s how that these programmes have significant positive impacts on the livelihoods of beneficiary households. In Zambia, the Child Grant programme had large and positive impacts across an array of income generating activities. The impact of the programmes in Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi and Zimbabwe were more selective in nature, while the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty programme in Ghana had fewer direct impacts on productive activities, and more on various dimensions of risk management .
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book (stand-alone) biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
FAO ;
2017
|
Online Access: | https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/I6826EN http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6826e.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-fao-it-20.500.14283-I6826EN |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-fao-it-20.500.14283-I6826EN2024-03-16T12:26:06Z The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa Daidone, Handa, Winters This report synthesizes the analysis and findings of a set of seven country impact evaluation studies that explore the impact of cash transfer programmes on household economic decision-making, productive activities and labour allocation in sub-Saharan Africa. The seven countries are Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Results from seven recently completed rigorous impact evaluations of government-run unconditional social cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa s how that these programmes have significant positive impacts on the livelihoods of beneficiary households. In Zambia, the Child Grant programme had large and positive impacts across an array of income generating activities. The impact of the programmes in Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi and Zimbabwe were more selective in nature, while the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty programme in Ghana had fewer direct impacts on productive activities, and more on various dimensions of risk management . 2023-04-27T11:16:24Z 2023-04-27T11:16:24Z 2017 2020-03-02T15:03:55.0000000Z Book (stand-alone) 978-92-5-109635-2 https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/I6826EN http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6826e.pdf English FAO 66 p. application/pdf Zimbabwe FAO ; |
institution |
FAO IT |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Italia |
countrycode |
IT |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-fao-it |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
David Lubin Memorial Library of FAO |
language |
English |
description |
This report synthesizes the analysis and findings of a set of seven country impact evaluation studies that explore the impact of cash transfer programmes on household economic decision-making, productive activities and labour allocation in sub-Saharan Africa. The seven countries are Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Results from seven recently completed rigorous impact evaluations of government-run unconditional social cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa s how that these programmes have significant positive impacts on the livelihoods of beneficiary households. In Zambia, the Child Grant programme had large and positive impacts across an array of income generating activities. The impact of the programmes in Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi and Zimbabwe were more selective in nature, while the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty programme in Ghana had fewer direct impacts on productive activities, and more on various dimensions of risk management . |
format |
Book (stand-alone) |
author |
Daidone, Handa, Winters |
spellingShingle |
Daidone, Handa, Winters The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa |
author_facet |
Daidone, Handa, Winters |
author_sort |
Daidone, Handa, Winters |
title |
The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa |
title_short |
The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa |
title_full |
The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa |
title_fullStr |
The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
The household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa |
title_sort |
household- and individual-level economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in sub-saharan africa |
publisher |
FAO ; |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/I6826EN http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6826e.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT daidonehandawinters thehouseholdandindividualleveleconomicimpactsofcashtransferprogrammesinsubsaharanafrica AT daidonehandawinters householdandindividualleveleconomicimpactsofcashtransferprogrammesinsubsaharanafrica |
_version_ |
1799240777070542848 |