Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens

FAO and WHO reconvened a third meeting to review and evaluate the evidence in support of precautionary allergen labelling to address unintended allergen presence in foods. The Expert Committee at the third meeting reviewed the data on the current status and uses of the precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) and unanimously agreed that current PAL systems used in many countries needed to be improved as they were neither uniform nor informative and were not consistently risk based on amount and frequency of UAP found in food products. The Expert Committee also found that current PAL approaches led to widespread PAL that diminished information and value for consumers. The Expert Committee reviewed again the principles and basis of RfD from the second meeting and reached a consensus that the RfD for each priority allergen, as described by the HBGV and safety objectives, was a valid risk assessment endpoint for determining when sporadic or unexpected UAP posed more than appreciable risk to consumers and needed to be communicated to consumers by PAL.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ​FAO; WHO;
Format: Book (series) biblioteca
Language:English
Published: FAO ; WHO ; 2023
Online Access:https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/CC6081EN
http://www.fao.org/3/cc6081en/cc6081en.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-fao-it-20.500.14283-CC6081EN
record_format koha
spelling dig-fao-it-20.500.14283-CC6081EN2024-03-16T13:16:22Z Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens Meeting report ​FAO; WHO; FAO and WHO reconvened a third meeting to review and evaluate the evidence in support of precautionary allergen labelling to address unintended allergen presence in foods. The Expert Committee at the third meeting reviewed the data on the current status and uses of the precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) and unanimously agreed that current PAL systems used in many countries needed to be improved as they were neither uniform nor informative and were not consistently risk based on amount and frequency of UAP found in food products. The Expert Committee also found that current PAL approaches led to widespread PAL that diminished information and value for consumers. The Expert Committee reviewed again the principles and basis of RfD from the second meeting and reached a consensus that the RfD for each priority allergen, as described by the HBGV and safety objectives, was a valid risk assessment endpoint for determining when sporadic or unexpected UAP posed more than appreciable risk to consumers and needed to be communicated to consumers by PAL. 2023-10-12T11:40:18Z 2023-10-12T11:40:18Z 2023 2023-12-27T19:09:22.0000000Z Book (series) 2664-5246 978-92-5-137878-6 2415-1173 https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/CC6081EN http://www.fao.org/3/cc6081en/cc6081en.pdf English Food Safety and Quality Series No. 16 Shared 104 p. application/pdf FAO ; WHO ;
institution FAO IT
collection DSpace
country Italia
countrycode IT
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-fao-it
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname David Lubin Memorial Library of FAO
language English
description FAO and WHO reconvened a third meeting to review and evaluate the evidence in support of precautionary allergen labelling to address unintended allergen presence in foods. The Expert Committee at the third meeting reviewed the data on the current status and uses of the precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) and unanimously agreed that current PAL systems used in many countries needed to be improved as they were neither uniform nor informative and were not consistently risk based on amount and frequency of UAP found in food products. The Expert Committee also found that current PAL approaches led to widespread PAL that diminished information and value for consumers. The Expert Committee reviewed again the principles and basis of RfD from the second meeting and reached a consensus that the RfD for each priority allergen, as described by the HBGV and safety objectives, was a valid risk assessment endpoint for determining when sporadic or unexpected UAP posed more than appreciable risk to consumers and needed to be communicated to consumers by PAL.
format Book (series)
author ​FAO; WHO;
spellingShingle ​FAO; WHO;
Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens
author_facet ​FAO; WHO;
author_sort ​FAO; WHO;
title Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens
title_short Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens
title_full Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens
title_fullStr Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of Food Allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens
title_sort risk assessment of food allergens – part 3: review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens
publisher FAO ; WHO ;
publishDate 2023
url https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/CC6081EN
http://www.fao.org/3/cc6081en/cc6081en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT faowho riskassessmentoffoodallergenspart3reviewandestablishprecautionarylabellinginfoodsofthepriorityallergens
AT faowho meetingreport
_version_ 1799245682147590144