From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries

This report provides an overview of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) modalities for REDD+ reporting and additional technical Measurement, Reporting and Verification requirements from different standards for accessing jurisdictional REDD+ results-based payments, focusing on REDD+ reference levels and results reported, illustrating the choices countries have made when constructing their reference levels. Beyond the Green Climate Fund results-based payments pilot programme, jurisdictional REDD+ results-based payment opportunities discussed are the Carbon Fund, the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, and Verra's Jurisdicitonal and Nested REDD standard. This publication discusses differences between REDD+ results reported to the UNFCCC and REDD+ accounting towards receiving results-based payments, especially differences in volume: 11.5 billion tCO2eq emission reductions are reported to the UNFCCC, while 146 million tCO2eq emission reductions are reported to the Carbon Fund and the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions combined. Though ER reporting to the voluntary carbon market has only recently started and may still increase, its volume is expected to be limited. Potential limiting factors are discussed. The world’s collective progress towards achieving the Paris Agreement and its long-term goals is assessed through the global stocktake. The last part of this publication shows how some countries are using REDD+ reporting to improve their NDCs, BURs and Biennial Transparency Reports. The mitigation potential of REDD+ is discussed in the context of the global stocktake exercise.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sandker, M.; Neeff, T.; Todd, K.; Poultouchidou, A.; Cóndor-Gólec, R.; Felicani-Robles, F.; Santos-Acuña, L.; Duchelle, A.;
Format: Book (series) biblioteca
Language:English
Published: FAO ; 2022
Online Access:https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/CC2899EN
http://www.fao.org/3/cc2899en/cc2899en.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-fao-it-20.500.14283-CC2899EN
record_format koha
spelling dig-fao-it-20.500.14283-CC2899EN2024-03-16T13:35:20Z From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries 2022 update Sandker, M.; Neeff, T.; Todd, K.; Poultouchidou, A.; Cóndor-Gólec, R.; Felicani-Robles, F.; Santos-Acuña, L.; Duchelle, A.; This report provides an overview of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) modalities for REDD+ reporting and additional technical Measurement, Reporting and Verification requirements from different standards for accessing jurisdictional REDD+ results-based payments, focusing on REDD+ reference levels and results reported, illustrating the choices countries have made when constructing their reference levels. Beyond the Green Climate Fund results-based payments pilot programme, jurisdictional REDD+ results-based payment opportunities discussed are the Carbon Fund, the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, and Verra's Jurisdicitonal and Nested REDD standard. This publication discusses differences between REDD+ results reported to the UNFCCC and REDD+ accounting towards receiving results-based payments, especially differences in volume: 11.5 billion tCO2eq emission reductions are reported to the UNFCCC, while 146 million tCO2eq emission reductions are reported to the Carbon Fund and the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions combined. Though ER reporting to the voluntary carbon market has only recently started and may still increase, its volume is expected to be limited. Potential limiting factors are discussed. The world’s collective progress towards achieving the Paris Agreement and its long-term goals is assessed through the global stocktake. The last part of this publication shows how some countries are using REDD+ reporting to improve their NDCs, BURs and Biennial Transparency Reports. The mitigation potential of REDD+ is discussed in the context of the global stocktake exercise. 2023-04-27T13:57:11Z 2023-04-27T13:57:11Z 2022 2022-11-16T11:19:19.0000000Z Book (series) 2664-1070 978-92-5-137185-5 2664-1062 https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/CC2899EN http://www.fao.org/3/cc2899en/cc2899en.pdf English Forestry Working Paper No. 35 FAO 84 p. application/pdf FAO ;
institution FAO IT
collection DSpace
country Italia
countrycode IT
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-fao-it
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname David Lubin Memorial Library of FAO
language English
description This report provides an overview of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) modalities for REDD+ reporting and additional technical Measurement, Reporting and Verification requirements from different standards for accessing jurisdictional REDD+ results-based payments, focusing on REDD+ reference levels and results reported, illustrating the choices countries have made when constructing their reference levels. Beyond the Green Climate Fund results-based payments pilot programme, jurisdictional REDD+ results-based payment opportunities discussed are the Carbon Fund, the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, and Verra's Jurisdicitonal and Nested REDD standard. This publication discusses differences between REDD+ results reported to the UNFCCC and REDD+ accounting towards receiving results-based payments, especially differences in volume: 11.5 billion tCO2eq emission reductions are reported to the UNFCCC, while 146 million tCO2eq emission reductions are reported to the Carbon Fund and the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions combined. Though ER reporting to the voluntary carbon market has only recently started and may still increase, its volume is expected to be limited. Potential limiting factors are discussed. The world’s collective progress towards achieving the Paris Agreement and its long-term goals is assessed through the global stocktake. The last part of this publication shows how some countries are using REDD+ reporting to improve their NDCs, BURs and Biennial Transparency Reports. The mitigation potential of REDD+ is discussed in the context of the global stocktake exercise.
format Book (series)
author Sandker, M.; Neeff, T.; Todd, K.; Poultouchidou, A.; Cóndor-Gólec, R.; Felicani-Robles, F.; Santos-Acuña, L.; Duchelle, A.;
spellingShingle Sandker, M.; Neeff, T.; Todd, K.; Poultouchidou, A.; Cóndor-Gólec, R.; Felicani-Robles, F.; Santos-Acuña, L.; Duchelle, A.;
From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries
author_facet Sandker, M.; Neeff, T.; Todd, K.; Poultouchidou, A.; Cóndor-Gólec, R.; Felicani-Robles, F.; Santos-Acuña, L.; Duchelle, A.;
author_sort Sandker, M.; Neeff, T.; Todd, K.; Poultouchidou, A.; Cóndor-Gólec, R.; Felicani-Robles, F.; Santos-Acuña, L.; Duchelle, A.;
title From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries
title_short From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries
title_full From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries
title_fullStr From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries
title_full_unstemmed From reference levels to results: REDD+ reporting by countries
title_sort from reference levels to results: redd+ reporting by countries
publisher FAO ;
publishDate 2022
url https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/CC2899EN
http://www.fao.org/3/cc2899en/cc2899en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sandkermneeffttoddkpoultouchidouacondorgolecrfelicaniroblesfsantosacunalduchellea fromreferencelevelstoresultsreddreportingbycountries
AT sandkermneeffttoddkpoultouchidouacondorgolecrfelicaniroblesfsantosacunalduchellea 2022update
_version_ 1799247393705689088