Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation

The biogeochemical effects of conservation agriculture (CA), such as soil organic carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions, have been extensively studied. However, recent research has shown that management practices also have biogeophysical effects on both local and global climates by altering surface albedo and energy partitioning. We assessed the biogeophysical impacts of CA in maize fields during two successive seasons (2021/22-2022/23) at two long-term experimental sites in Zimbabwe with contrasting soil properties: Domboshawa Training Center (DTC) with a light abruptic Lixisol (sandy soil) and the University of Zimbabwe Farm (UZF) with a dark xanthic Ferralsol (clayey soil). We monitored surface albedo, longwave radiation, leaf area index (LAI), and soil moisture/temperature under three treatments: conventional tillage (CT), notillage (NT), and no-tillage with mulch (NTM). Our findings reveal that, across all treatments during the two monitored seasons, the average surface albedo of the xanthic Ferralsol at UZF was consistently lower than that of the abruptic Lixisol at DTC. It results a cooling effect in both NT and NTM treatments compared to CT in the clayey soil at UZF. During the 2021/22 season, the mean annual radiative forcing (RF) of NT and NTM were -0.83 W.m-² and -0.43 W.m-2 respectively, while during the second season (2022/23) the annual mean RF was -1.43 W.m-2 for NT and -1.03 W.m-2 for NTM.On the sandy soil at DTC, a warming effect was observed due to soil darkening induced by mulching. The mean annual RF of NT in this site was -3.34 W.m-2 during the first season and -2.78 W.m-2 during the second. In contrast, NTM showed a warming effect with an RF of 1.2 W.m-2 in 2021/22, and 2.77 W.m-2 during the 2022/23 season. The RF induced by albedo change were converted into CO2-equivalents in order to compare it with biogeochemical effects of CA through changes in soil N2O emissions and SOC storage. The results demonstrated an opposite effect on RF and of the same magnitude between albedo and soil organic carbon (SOC) in the NT and NTM treatments at DTC, suggesting that CA might not bring any mitigation benefit if mulch is applied on light coloured soils.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diop, Souleymane, Cardinael, Rémi, Lauerwald, Ronny, Ferlicoq, Morgan, Thierfelder, Christian, Chikowo, Régis, Corbeels, Marc, Ceschia, Eric
Format: conference_item biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: EGU
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/609270/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/609270/1/Diop%20EGU24-6466-print.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-609270
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-6092702024-04-22T13:02:57Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/609270/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/609270/ Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation. Diop Souleymane, Cardinael Rémi, Lauerwald Ronny, Ferlicoq Morgan, Thierfelder Christian, Chikowo Régis, Corbeels Marc, Ceschia Eric. 2024. . EGU. Vienne : EGU, Résumé, 1 p. EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienne, Autriche, 14 Avril 2024/19 Avril 2024.https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6466 <https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6466> Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation Diop, Souleymane Cardinael, Rémi Lauerwald, Ronny Ferlicoq, Morgan Thierfelder, Christian Chikowo, Régis Corbeels, Marc Ceschia, Eric eng 2024 EGU The biogeochemical effects of conservation agriculture (CA), such as soil organic carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions, have been extensively studied. However, recent research has shown that management practices also have biogeophysical effects on both local and global climates by altering surface albedo and energy partitioning. We assessed the biogeophysical impacts of CA in maize fields during two successive seasons (2021/22-2022/23) at two long-term experimental sites in Zimbabwe with contrasting soil properties: Domboshawa Training Center (DTC) with a light abruptic Lixisol (sandy soil) and the University of Zimbabwe Farm (UZF) with a dark xanthic Ferralsol (clayey soil). We monitored surface albedo, longwave radiation, leaf area index (LAI), and soil moisture/temperature under three treatments: conventional tillage (CT), notillage (NT), and no-tillage with mulch (NTM). Our findings reveal that, across all treatments during the two monitored seasons, the average surface albedo of the xanthic Ferralsol at UZF was consistently lower than that of the abruptic Lixisol at DTC. It results a cooling effect in both NT and NTM treatments compared to CT in the clayey soil at UZF. During the 2021/22 season, the mean annual radiative forcing (RF) of NT and NTM were -0.83 W.m-² and -0.43 W.m-2 respectively, while during the second season (2022/23) the annual mean RF was -1.43 W.m-2 for NT and -1.03 W.m-2 for NTM.On the sandy soil at DTC, a warming effect was observed due to soil darkening induced by mulching. The mean annual RF of NT in this site was -3.34 W.m-2 during the first season and -2.78 W.m-2 during the second. In contrast, NTM showed a warming effect with an RF of 1.2 W.m-2 in 2021/22, and 2.77 W.m-2 during the 2022/23 season. The RF induced by albedo change were converted into CO2-equivalents in order to compare it with biogeochemical effects of CA through changes in soil N2O emissions and SOC storage. The results demonstrated an opposite effect on RF and of the same magnitude between albedo and soil organic carbon (SOC) in the NT and NTM treatments at DTC, suggesting that CA might not bring any mitigation benefit if mulch is applied on light coloured soils. conference_item info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/609270/1/Diop%20EGU24-6466-print.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6466 10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6466 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6466 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6466
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
description The biogeochemical effects of conservation agriculture (CA), such as soil organic carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions, have been extensively studied. However, recent research has shown that management practices also have biogeophysical effects on both local and global climates by altering surface albedo and energy partitioning. We assessed the biogeophysical impacts of CA in maize fields during two successive seasons (2021/22-2022/23) at two long-term experimental sites in Zimbabwe with contrasting soil properties: Domboshawa Training Center (DTC) with a light abruptic Lixisol (sandy soil) and the University of Zimbabwe Farm (UZF) with a dark xanthic Ferralsol (clayey soil). We monitored surface albedo, longwave radiation, leaf area index (LAI), and soil moisture/temperature under three treatments: conventional tillage (CT), notillage (NT), and no-tillage with mulch (NTM). Our findings reveal that, across all treatments during the two monitored seasons, the average surface albedo of the xanthic Ferralsol at UZF was consistently lower than that of the abruptic Lixisol at DTC. It results a cooling effect in both NT and NTM treatments compared to CT in the clayey soil at UZF. During the 2021/22 season, the mean annual radiative forcing (RF) of NT and NTM were -0.83 W.m-² and -0.43 W.m-2 respectively, while during the second season (2022/23) the annual mean RF was -1.43 W.m-2 for NT and -1.03 W.m-2 for NTM.On the sandy soil at DTC, a warming effect was observed due to soil darkening induced by mulching. The mean annual RF of NT in this site was -3.34 W.m-2 during the first season and -2.78 W.m-2 during the second. In contrast, NTM showed a warming effect with an RF of 1.2 W.m-2 in 2021/22, and 2.77 W.m-2 during the 2022/23 season. The RF induced by albedo change were converted into CO2-equivalents in order to compare it with biogeochemical effects of CA through changes in soil N2O emissions and SOC storage. The results demonstrated an opposite effect on RF and of the same magnitude between albedo and soil organic carbon (SOC) in the NT and NTM treatments at DTC, suggesting that CA might not bring any mitigation benefit if mulch is applied on light coloured soils.
format conference_item
author Diop, Souleymane
Cardinael, Rémi
Lauerwald, Ronny
Ferlicoq, Morgan
Thierfelder, Christian
Chikowo, Régis
Corbeels, Marc
Ceschia, Eric
spellingShingle Diop, Souleymane
Cardinael, Rémi
Lauerwald, Ronny
Ferlicoq, Morgan
Thierfelder, Christian
Chikowo, Régis
Corbeels, Marc
Ceschia, Eric
Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation
author_facet Diop, Souleymane
Cardinael, Rémi
Lauerwald, Ronny
Ferlicoq, Morgan
Thierfelder, Christian
Chikowo, Régis
Corbeels, Marc
Ceschia, Eric
author_sort Diop, Souleymane
title Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation
title_short Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation
title_full Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation
title_fullStr Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation
title_full_unstemmed Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation
title_sort interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation
publisher EGU
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/609270/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/609270/1/Diop%20EGU24-6466-print.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT diopsouleymane interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
AT cardinaelremi interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
AT lauerwaldronny interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
AT ferlicoqmorgan interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
AT thierfelderchristian interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
AT chikoworegis interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
AT corbeelsmarc interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
AT ceschiaeric interactionbetweensoiltypeandcroppingsystemonalbedodynamicsleadstocontrastedimpactonclimatemitigation
_version_ 1798165220692066304