Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests
The jurisdictional approach concept emerged in response to the widespread failure of sectoral forest conservation projects. Despite its increasing popularity, understanding jurisdictional approach outcomes is challenging, given that many remain in either the formation or implementation stage. Furthermore, diverse stakeholders hold different perspectives on what exactly a jurisdictional approach is intended to pursue. These different perspectives are important to unravel, as having a shared understanding of the outcomes is important to build the critical support needed for it. This study aims to add to the limited evidence with a case study in Sabah, Malaysia, which is committed to addressing a leading deforestation driver (palm oil) through sustainability certification in a jurisdiction. We used Q-methodology to explore stakeholder perceptions, revealing three distinct perspectives regarding what outcomes jurisdictional approaches should pursue. We asked about outcomes achievable within ten years (2022–2032) and considering real-world constraints. We found different perspectives regarding economic, environmental, governance, and smallholders' welfare outcomes. However, we found consensus among stakeholders about some outcomes: (i) that achieving zero-deforestation is untenable, (ii) that issuing compensation or incentives to private land owners to not convert forests into plantations is unrealistic, (iii) that the human well-being of plantation workers could improve through better welfare, and (iv) the free, prior and informed consent given by local communities being required legally. The findings offer insights into key stakeholders' perceptions of the deliverables of jurisdictional approaches and the difficulty of achieving its objectives under real-world constraints.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-606194 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-6061942024-01-29T06:10:10Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/606194/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/606194/ Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests. Ng Su Chen Julia, Chervier Colas, Carmenta Rachel, Samdin Zaiton, Azhar Badrul, Karsenty Alain. 2024. Environmental Management, 73 : 259-273.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z> Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests Ng Su Chen, Julia Chervier, Colas Carmenta, Rachel Samdin, Zaiton Azhar, Badrul Karsenty, Alain eng 2024 Environmental Management E10 - Économie et politique agricoles U70 - Sciences humaines et sociales D50 - Législation infertilité femelle déboisement bien-être social partie intéressée Elaeis guineensis conservation des ressources étude de cas plantation forestière conservation des forêts gestion des ressources naturelles gouvernance incitation forêt travailleur forestier http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2851 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15590 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9001020 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2509 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25278 Malaisie http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4533 The jurisdictional approach concept emerged in response to the widespread failure of sectoral forest conservation projects. Despite its increasing popularity, understanding jurisdictional approach outcomes is challenging, given that many remain in either the formation or implementation stage. Furthermore, diverse stakeholders hold different perspectives on what exactly a jurisdictional approach is intended to pursue. These different perspectives are important to unravel, as having a shared understanding of the outcomes is important to build the critical support needed for it. This study aims to add to the limited evidence with a case study in Sabah, Malaysia, which is committed to addressing a leading deforestation driver (palm oil) through sustainability certification in a jurisdiction. We used Q-methodology to explore stakeholder perceptions, revealing three distinct perspectives regarding what outcomes jurisdictional approaches should pursue. We asked about outcomes achievable within ten years (2022–2032) and considering real-world constraints. We found different perspectives regarding economic, environmental, governance, and smallholders' welfare outcomes. However, we found consensus among stakeholders about some outcomes: (i) that achieving zero-deforestation is untenable, (ii) that issuing compensation or incentives to private land owners to not convert forests into plantations is unrealistic, (iii) that the human well-being of plantation workers could improve through better welfare, and (iv) the free, prior and informed consent given by local communities being required legally. The findings offer insights into key stakeholders' perceptions of the deliverables of jurisdictional approaches and the difficulty of achieving its objectives under real-world constraints. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/606194/7/606194.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z 10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
E10 - Économie et politique agricoles U70 - Sciences humaines et sociales D50 - Législation infertilité femelle déboisement bien-être social partie intéressée Elaeis guineensis conservation des ressources étude de cas plantation forestière conservation des forêts gestion des ressources naturelles gouvernance incitation forêt travailleur forestier http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2851 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15590 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9001020 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2509 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25278 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4533 E10 - Économie et politique agricoles U70 - Sciences humaines et sociales D50 - Législation infertilité femelle déboisement bien-être social partie intéressée Elaeis guineensis conservation des ressources étude de cas plantation forestière conservation des forêts gestion des ressources naturelles gouvernance incitation forêt travailleur forestier http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2851 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15590 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9001020 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2509 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25278 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4533 |
spellingShingle |
E10 - Économie et politique agricoles U70 - Sciences humaines et sociales D50 - Législation infertilité femelle déboisement bien-être social partie intéressée Elaeis guineensis conservation des ressources étude de cas plantation forestière conservation des forêts gestion des ressources naturelles gouvernance incitation forêt travailleur forestier http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2851 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15590 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9001020 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2509 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25278 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4533 E10 - Économie et politique agricoles U70 - Sciences humaines et sociales D50 - Législation infertilité femelle déboisement bien-être social partie intéressée Elaeis guineensis conservation des ressources étude de cas plantation forestière conservation des forêts gestion des ressources naturelles gouvernance incitation forêt travailleur forestier http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2851 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15590 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9001020 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2509 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25278 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4533 Ng Su Chen, Julia Chervier, Colas Carmenta, Rachel Samdin, Zaiton Azhar, Badrul Karsenty, Alain Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests |
description |
The jurisdictional approach concept emerged in response to the widespread failure of sectoral forest conservation projects. Despite its increasing popularity, understanding jurisdictional approach outcomes is challenging, given that many remain in either the formation or implementation stage. Furthermore, diverse stakeholders hold different perspectives on what exactly a jurisdictional approach is intended to pursue. These different perspectives are important to unravel, as having a shared understanding of the outcomes is important to build the critical support needed for it. This study aims to add to the limited evidence with a case study in Sabah, Malaysia, which is committed to addressing a leading deforestation driver (palm oil) through sustainability certification in a jurisdiction. We used Q-methodology to explore stakeholder perceptions, revealing three distinct perspectives regarding what outcomes jurisdictional approaches should pursue. We asked about outcomes achievable within ten years (2022–2032) and considering real-world constraints. We found different perspectives regarding economic, environmental, governance, and smallholders' welfare outcomes. However, we found consensus among stakeholders about some outcomes: (i) that achieving zero-deforestation is untenable, (ii) that issuing compensation or incentives to private land owners to not convert forests into plantations is unrealistic, (iii) that the human well-being of plantation workers could improve through better welfare, and (iv) the free, prior and informed consent given by local communities being required legally. The findings offer insights into key stakeholders' perceptions of the deliverables of jurisdictional approaches and the difficulty of achieving its objectives under real-world constraints. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
E10 - Économie et politique agricoles U70 - Sciences humaines et sociales D50 - Législation infertilité femelle déboisement bien-être social partie intéressée Elaeis guineensis conservation des ressources étude de cas plantation forestière conservation des forêts gestion des ressources naturelles gouvernance incitation forêt travailleur forestier http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2851 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15590 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9001020 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2509 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25278 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4533 |
author |
Ng Su Chen, Julia Chervier, Colas Carmenta, Rachel Samdin, Zaiton Azhar, Badrul Karsenty, Alain |
author_facet |
Ng Su Chen, Julia Chervier, Colas Carmenta, Rachel Samdin, Zaiton Azhar, Badrul Karsenty, Alain |
author_sort |
Ng Su Chen, Julia |
title |
Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests |
title_short |
Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests |
title_full |
Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests |
title_fullStr |
Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Balancing ambitions and realities: Stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's Forests |
title_sort |
balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in sabah's forests |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/606194/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/606194/7/606194.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ngsuchenjulia balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests AT cherviercolas balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests AT carmentarachel balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests AT samdinzaiton balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests AT azharbadrul balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests AT karsentyalain balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests |
_version_ |
1792500618392240128 |