Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm

RATIONALE - Counting coffee berry borer (CBB) from field traps is a tedious process due to the number of traps (BROCAP®) that may be operating, the important number of individuals that can be captured in each trap, and the litter remains (moss, insects, leaves, etc.) found within the traps. The sample processing time to identify and count CBB can be reduced with the use of photographs and computer vision algorithms. METHODS - We trained Corigan, a pipeline developed for small object detection with high resolution images that uses yolo3 engineering as the object detection core. The photos used to train Corigan came from a study to assess the effects of adjacent land uses on CBB dispersion, which is currently in the field phase. We used photographs with a resolution of 4000 x 2672 pixels of 180 dpi and 24bit depth, taken with a Panasonic DMC-G2 camera with a light aperture of 3.5, exposure time of 1/125s and an ISO of 100 with a focal length of 14 mm. We used 318 photographs to train the model and 30 photographs to validate the efficiency of the model. RESULTS - Out of a total of 897 CBB found in the 30 photographs, the model identified 851 CBB (true positives; recall = 95%), identifying 230 objects (false positive) that did not correspond to CBB (accuracy = 72%) and not recognizing 53 CBB samples (5% of false negatives). The model mean average precision (mAP) was 74%. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES - The use of the pipeline detection reduces processing time considerably. Litter remains difficulted detection of CBB by the pipeline. Therefore, we suggest the use of at least three different photographs of the same sample each one taken after stirring the sampling material, and the use of the average detected CBB from these three counts for subsequent analysis. We believe that the use of detection averages will reduce the error caused by false positive detection. We will continue to improve the accuracy of the algorithm to reduce false positives, and work to improve the pipeline to detect CBB different stages (egg, larva, pupa, adult).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vilchez Mendoza, Sergio José, Bagny-Beilhe, Leïla, Bommel, Pierre, Cilas, Christian, Ronin, Antoine, Carval, Dominique
Format: conference_item biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: ASIC
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/600228/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/600228/13/ID600228.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-600228
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-6002282024-04-24T12:12:54Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/600228/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/600228/ Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm. Vilchez Mendoza Sergio José, Bagny-Beilhe Leïla, Bommel Pierre, Cilas Christian, Ronin Antoine, Carval Dominique. 2021. In : 28th Conference of Association for the Science and Information on Coffee - Books of abstracts. ASIC. Montpellier : ASIC, Résumé, p. 218. Conference of Association for the Science and Information on Coffee (ASIC 2021). 28, Montpellier, France, 28 Juin 2021/1 Juillet 2021.https://www.alphavisa.com/asic/2021/documents/Book-of-Abstracts_Asic2021.pdf <https://www.alphavisa.com/asic/2021/documents/Book-of-Abstracts_Asic2021.pdf> Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm Vilchez Mendoza, Sergio José Bagny-Beilhe, Leïla Bommel, Pierre Cilas, Christian Ronin, Antoine Carval, Dominique eng 2021 ASIC 28th Conference of Association for the Science and Information on Coffee - Books of abstracts RATIONALE - Counting coffee berry borer (CBB) from field traps is a tedious process due to the number of traps (BROCAP®) that may be operating, the important number of individuals that can be captured in each trap, and the litter remains (moss, insects, leaves, etc.) found within the traps. The sample processing time to identify and count CBB can be reduced with the use of photographs and computer vision algorithms. METHODS - We trained Corigan, a pipeline developed for small object detection with high resolution images that uses yolo3 engineering as the object detection core. The photos used to train Corigan came from a study to assess the effects of adjacent land uses on CBB dispersion, which is currently in the field phase. We used photographs with a resolution of 4000 x 2672 pixels of 180 dpi and 24bit depth, taken with a Panasonic DMC-G2 camera with a light aperture of 3.5, exposure time of 1/125s and an ISO of 100 with a focal length of 14 mm. We used 318 photographs to train the model and 30 photographs to validate the efficiency of the model. RESULTS - Out of a total of 897 CBB found in the 30 photographs, the model identified 851 CBB (true positives; recall = 95%), identifying 230 objects (false positive) that did not correspond to CBB (accuracy = 72%) and not recognizing 53 CBB samples (5% of false negatives). The model mean average precision (mAP) was 74%. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES - The use of the pipeline detection reduces processing time considerably. Litter remains difficulted detection of CBB by the pipeline. Therefore, we suggest the use of at least three different photographs of the same sample each one taken after stirring the sampling material, and the use of the average detected CBB from these three counts for subsequent analysis. We believe that the use of detection averages will reduce the error caused by false positive detection. We will continue to improve the accuracy of the algorithm to reduce false positives, and work to improve the pipeline to detect CBB different stages (egg, larva, pupa, adult). conference_item info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/600228/13/ID600228.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://www.alphavisa.com/asic/2021/documents/Book-of-Abstracts_Asic2021.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://www.alphavisa.com/asic/2021/documents/Book-of-Abstracts_Asic2021.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/purl/https://github.com/SVMendoza/Detection-and-count-CBB
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
description RATIONALE - Counting coffee berry borer (CBB) from field traps is a tedious process due to the number of traps (BROCAP®) that may be operating, the important number of individuals that can be captured in each trap, and the litter remains (moss, insects, leaves, etc.) found within the traps. The sample processing time to identify and count CBB can be reduced with the use of photographs and computer vision algorithms. METHODS - We trained Corigan, a pipeline developed for small object detection with high resolution images that uses yolo3 engineering as the object detection core. The photos used to train Corigan came from a study to assess the effects of adjacent land uses on CBB dispersion, which is currently in the field phase. We used photographs with a resolution of 4000 x 2672 pixels of 180 dpi and 24bit depth, taken with a Panasonic DMC-G2 camera with a light aperture of 3.5, exposure time of 1/125s and an ISO of 100 with a focal length of 14 mm. We used 318 photographs to train the model and 30 photographs to validate the efficiency of the model. RESULTS - Out of a total of 897 CBB found in the 30 photographs, the model identified 851 CBB (true positives; recall = 95%), identifying 230 objects (false positive) that did not correspond to CBB (accuracy = 72%) and not recognizing 53 CBB samples (5% of false negatives). The model mean average precision (mAP) was 74%. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES - The use of the pipeline detection reduces processing time considerably. Litter remains difficulted detection of CBB by the pipeline. Therefore, we suggest the use of at least three different photographs of the same sample each one taken after stirring the sampling material, and the use of the average detected CBB from these three counts for subsequent analysis. We believe that the use of detection averages will reduce the error caused by false positive detection. We will continue to improve the accuracy of the algorithm to reduce false positives, and work to improve the pipeline to detect CBB different stages (egg, larva, pupa, adult).
format conference_item
author Vilchez Mendoza, Sergio José
Bagny-Beilhe, Leïla
Bommel, Pierre
Cilas, Christian
Ronin, Antoine
Carval, Dominique
spellingShingle Vilchez Mendoza, Sergio José
Bagny-Beilhe, Leïla
Bommel, Pierre
Cilas, Christian
Ronin, Antoine
Carval, Dominique
Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm
author_facet Vilchez Mendoza, Sergio José
Bagny-Beilhe, Leïla
Bommel, Pierre
Cilas, Christian
Ronin, Antoine
Carval, Dominique
author_sort Vilchez Mendoza, Sergio José
title Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm
title_short Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm
title_full Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm
title_fullStr Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Detection and counting of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm
title_sort detection and counting of coffee berry borer (hypothenemus hampei) using computer vision algorithm
publisher ASIC
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/600228/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/600228/13/ID600228.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vilchezmendozasergiojose detectionandcountingofcoffeeberryborerhypothenemushampeiusingcomputervisionalgorithm
AT bagnybeilheleila detectionandcountingofcoffeeberryborerhypothenemushampeiusingcomputervisionalgorithm
AT bommelpierre detectionandcountingofcoffeeberryborerhypothenemushampeiusingcomputervisionalgorithm
AT cilaschristian detectionandcountingofcoffeeberryborerhypothenemushampeiusingcomputervisionalgorithm
AT roninantoine detectionandcountingofcoffeeberryborerhypothenemushampeiusingcomputervisionalgorithm
AT carvaldominique detectionandcountingofcoffeeberryborerhypothenemushampeiusingcomputervisionalgorithm
_version_ 1798165073693245440