Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings

Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked-in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buchs, Arnaud, Hassenforder, Emeline, Meinard, Yves
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:approche participative, conservation des ressources, relation homme-faune, services écosystémiques, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/1/Conservation_Biology-2020%20-Buchs-Hassenforder-Meinard_Adapting-participatory-processes.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-599891
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5998912024-01-29T05:44:24Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/ Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings. Buchs Arnaud, Hassenforder Emeline, Meinard Yves. 2021. Conservation Biology, 35 (3) : 804-815.https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654 <https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654> Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings Buchs, Arnaud Hassenforder, Emeline Meinard, Yves eng 2021 Conservation Biology approche participative conservation des ressources relation homme-faune services écosystémiques http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked-in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/1/Conservation_Biology-2020%20-Buchs-Hassenforder-Meinard_Adapting-participatory-processes.pdf text cc_by_nc_nd info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654 10.1111/cobi.13654 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cobi.13654 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic approche participative
conservation des ressources
relation homme-faune
services écosystémiques
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
approche participative
conservation des ressources
relation homme-faune
services écosystémiques
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
spellingShingle approche participative
conservation des ressources
relation homme-faune
services écosystémiques
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
approche participative
conservation des ressources
relation homme-faune
services écosystémiques
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
Buchs, Arnaud
Hassenforder, Emeline
Meinard, Yves
Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
description Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked-in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation.
format article
topic_facet approche participative
conservation des ressources
relation homme-faune
services écosystémiques
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
author Buchs, Arnaud
Hassenforder, Emeline
Meinard, Yves
author_facet Buchs, Arnaud
Hassenforder, Emeline
Meinard, Yves
author_sort Buchs, Arnaud
title Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
title_short Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
title_full Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
title_fullStr Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
title_full_unstemmed Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
title_sort adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/1/Conservation_Biology-2020%20-Buchs-Hassenforder-Meinard_Adapting-participatory-processes.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT buchsarnaud adaptingparticipatoryprocessestofinetuneconservationapproachesinmultiactordecisionsettings
AT hassenforderemeline adaptingparticipatoryprocessestofinetuneconservationapproachesinmultiactordecisionsettings
AT meinardyves adaptingparticipatoryprocessestofinetuneconservationapproachesinmultiactordecisionsettings
_version_ 1792500275561365504