Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked-in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation.
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | article biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | approche participative, conservation des ressources, relation homme-faune, services écosystémiques, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, |
Online Access: | http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/1/Conservation_Biology-2020%20-Buchs-Hassenforder-Meinard_Adapting-participatory-processes.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cirad-fr-599891 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5998912024-01-29T05:44:24Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/ Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings. Buchs Arnaud, Hassenforder Emeline, Meinard Yves. 2021. Conservation Biology, 35 (3) : 804-815.https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654 <https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654> Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings Buchs, Arnaud Hassenforder, Emeline Meinard, Yves eng 2021 Conservation Biology approche participative conservation des ressources relation homme-faune services écosystémiques http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked-in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/1/Conservation_Biology-2020%20-Buchs-Hassenforder-Meinard_Adapting-participatory-processes.pdf text cc_by_nc_nd info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654 10.1111/cobi.13654 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cobi.13654 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654 |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
approche participative conservation des ressources relation homme-faune services écosystémiques http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 approche participative conservation des ressources relation homme-faune services écosystémiques http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 |
spellingShingle |
approche participative conservation des ressources relation homme-faune services écosystémiques http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 approche participative conservation des ressources relation homme-faune services écosystémiques http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 Buchs, Arnaud Hassenforder, Emeline Meinard, Yves Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings |
description |
Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked-in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
approche participative conservation des ressources relation homme-faune services écosystémiques http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10b87fa7 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 |
author |
Buchs, Arnaud Hassenforder, Emeline Meinard, Yves |
author_facet |
Buchs, Arnaud Hassenforder, Emeline Meinard, Yves |
author_sort |
Buchs, Arnaud |
title |
Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings |
title_short |
Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings |
title_full |
Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings |
title_fullStr |
Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings |
title_sort |
adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599891/1/Conservation_Biology-2020%20-Buchs-Hassenforder-Meinard_Adapting-participatory-processes.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT buchsarnaud adaptingparticipatoryprocessestofinetuneconservationapproachesinmultiactordecisionsettings AT hassenforderemeline adaptingparticipatoryprocessestofinetuneconservationapproachesinmultiactordecisionsettings AT meinardyves adaptingparticipatoryprocessestofinetuneconservationapproachesinmultiactordecisionsettings |
_version_ |
1792500275561365504 |