Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status

Quantifying ecological condition, notably the extent of forest degradation is important for understanding and designing measures to protect biodiversity and enhancing the capacity of forests to deliver ecosystem services. Conservation planning, particularly the prioritization of management interventions for forests, is often lacking spatial data on forest degradation, and it is often overlooked within decision-making processes. We develop a continuous metric termed Forest Condition (FC) which aims to measure the degree of forest degradation on a scale from 0 to 100, incorporating the temporal history of forest change over any spatial extent. We parameterize this metric based on estimated changes in above ground biomass in the context of forest fragmentation over time to estimate a continuous measure of forest degradation for Congo Basin countries. We estimate that just <70% of Congo Basin forests remain fully intact, a decrease from 78% in the year 2000. FC was validated by direct remote sensing measurements from Landsat imagery for DRC. Results showed that FC was significantly positively correlated with forest canopy cover, gap area per hectare, and magnitude of temporal change in Normalized Burn Ratio. We tested the ability of FC to distinguish primary and secondary degradation and deforestation and found significant differences in gap area and spectral anomalies to validate our theoretical model. We apply the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria to demonstrate the integration of forest condition to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse. Based on this assessment, we found that without including FC in the assessment of biotic disruption, 12 ecosystems representing over 11% of forested area in 2015 would not have been assigned a threat status, and an additional 9 ecosystems would have a lower threat status. Our overall assessment of ecosystems found about half of all Congo Basin ecosystem types, accounting for 20% of all forest area are threatened to some degree, including 4 ecosystems (<1% of total area) which are critically engendered. FC is a transferrable and scalable assessment to support forest monitoring, planning, and management.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shapiro, Aurélie C., Grantham, Hedley, Aguilar-Amuchasteguid, Naikoa, Murray, Nicholas J., Gond, Valéry, Bonfils, Djoan, Rickenbach, Olivia
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection, conservation des forêts, santé des forêts, préservation de l'écosystème, aménagement forestier, dégradation des forêts, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36676, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1d694512, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331593, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8500, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1811, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2627, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3161, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1229, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_417,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/598096/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/598096/1/Shapiro_EI_2021.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-598096
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection
conservation des forêts
santé des forêts
préservation de l'écosystème
aménagement forestier
dégradation des forêts
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36676
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1d694512
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331593
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8500
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1811
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2627
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3161
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1229
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_417
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection
conservation des forêts
santé des forêts
préservation de l'écosystème
aménagement forestier
dégradation des forêts
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36676
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1d694512
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331593
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8500
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1811
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2627
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3161
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1229
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_417
spellingShingle P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection
conservation des forêts
santé des forêts
préservation de l'écosystème
aménagement forestier
dégradation des forêts
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36676
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1d694512
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331593
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8500
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1811
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2627
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3161
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1229
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_417
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection
conservation des forêts
santé des forêts
préservation de l'écosystème
aménagement forestier
dégradation des forêts
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36676
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1d694512
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331593
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8500
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1811
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2627
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3161
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1229
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_417
Shapiro, Aurélie C.
Grantham, Hedley
Aguilar-Amuchasteguid, Naikoa
Murray, Nicholas J.
Gond, Valéry
Bonfils, Djoan
Rickenbach, Olivia
Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status
description Quantifying ecological condition, notably the extent of forest degradation is important for understanding and designing measures to protect biodiversity and enhancing the capacity of forests to deliver ecosystem services. Conservation planning, particularly the prioritization of management interventions for forests, is often lacking spatial data on forest degradation, and it is often overlooked within decision-making processes. We develop a continuous metric termed Forest Condition (FC) which aims to measure the degree of forest degradation on a scale from 0 to 100, incorporating the temporal history of forest change over any spatial extent. We parameterize this metric based on estimated changes in above ground biomass in the context of forest fragmentation over time to estimate a continuous measure of forest degradation for Congo Basin countries. We estimate that just <70% of Congo Basin forests remain fully intact, a decrease from 78% in the year 2000. FC was validated by direct remote sensing measurements from Landsat imagery for DRC. Results showed that FC was significantly positively correlated with forest canopy cover, gap area per hectare, and magnitude of temporal change in Normalized Burn Ratio. We tested the ability of FC to distinguish primary and secondary degradation and deforestation and found significant differences in gap area and spectral anomalies to validate our theoretical model. We apply the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria to demonstrate the integration of forest condition to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse. Based on this assessment, we found that without including FC in the assessment of biotic disruption, 12 ecosystems representing over 11% of forested area in 2015 would not have been assigned a threat status, and an additional 9 ecosystems would have a lower threat status. Our overall assessment of ecosystems found about half of all Congo Basin ecosystem types, accounting for 20% of all forest area are threatened to some degree, including 4 ecosystems (<1% of total area) which are critically engendered. FC is a transferrable and scalable assessment to support forest monitoring, planning, and management.
format article
topic_facet P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection
conservation des forêts
santé des forêts
préservation de l'écosystème
aménagement forestier
dégradation des forêts
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36676
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1d694512
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331593
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8500
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1811
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2627
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3161
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1229
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_417
author Shapiro, Aurélie C.
Grantham, Hedley
Aguilar-Amuchasteguid, Naikoa
Murray, Nicholas J.
Gond, Valéry
Bonfils, Djoan
Rickenbach, Olivia
author_facet Shapiro, Aurélie C.
Grantham, Hedley
Aguilar-Amuchasteguid, Naikoa
Murray, Nicholas J.
Gond, Valéry
Bonfils, Djoan
Rickenbach, Olivia
author_sort Shapiro, Aurélie C.
title Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status
title_short Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status
title_full Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status
title_fullStr Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status
title_full_unstemmed Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status
title_sort forest condition in the congo basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/598096/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/598096/1/Shapiro_EI_2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shapiroaureliec forestconditioninthecongobasinfortheassessmentofecosystemconservationstatus
AT granthamhedley forestconditioninthecongobasinfortheassessmentofecosystemconservationstatus
AT aguilaramuchasteguidnaikoa forestconditioninthecongobasinfortheassessmentofecosystemconservationstatus
AT murraynicholasj forestconditioninthecongobasinfortheassessmentofecosystemconservationstatus
AT gondvalery forestconditioninthecongobasinfortheassessmentofecosystemconservationstatus
AT bonfilsdjoan forestconditioninthecongobasinfortheassessmentofecosystemconservationstatus
AT rickenbacholivia forestconditioninthecongobasinfortheassessmentofecosystemconservationstatus
_version_ 1792500147029016576
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5980962024-01-29T03:28:38Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/598096/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/598096/ Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status. Shapiro Aurélie C., Grantham Hedley, Aguilar-Amuchasteguid Naikoa, Murray Nicholas J., Gond Valéry, Bonfils Djoan, Rickenbach Olivia. 2021. Ecological Indicators, 122:107268, 16 p.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107268 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107268> Forest condition in the Congo Basin for the assessment of ecosystem conservation status Shapiro, Aurélie C. Grantham, Hedley Aguilar-Amuchasteguid, Naikoa Murray, Nicholas J. Gond, Valéry Bonfils, Djoan Rickenbach, Olivia eng 2021 Ecological Indicators P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection conservation des forêts santé des forêts préservation de l'écosystème aménagement forestier dégradation des forêts http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36676 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1d694512 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331593 République démocratique du Congo Congo Guinée Équatoriale Gabon Cameroun République centrafricaine Angola http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8500 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1811 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2627 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3161 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1229 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_417 Quantifying ecological condition, notably the extent of forest degradation is important for understanding and designing measures to protect biodiversity and enhancing the capacity of forests to deliver ecosystem services. Conservation planning, particularly the prioritization of management interventions for forests, is often lacking spatial data on forest degradation, and it is often overlooked within decision-making processes. We develop a continuous metric termed Forest Condition (FC) which aims to measure the degree of forest degradation on a scale from 0 to 100, incorporating the temporal history of forest change over any spatial extent. We parameterize this metric based on estimated changes in above ground biomass in the context of forest fragmentation over time to estimate a continuous measure of forest degradation for Congo Basin countries. We estimate that just <70% of Congo Basin forests remain fully intact, a decrease from 78% in the year 2000. FC was validated by direct remote sensing measurements from Landsat imagery for DRC. Results showed that FC was significantly positively correlated with forest canopy cover, gap area per hectare, and magnitude of temporal change in Normalized Burn Ratio. We tested the ability of FC to distinguish primary and secondary degradation and deforestation and found significant differences in gap area and spectral anomalies to validate our theoretical model. We apply the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria to demonstrate the integration of forest condition to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse. Based on this assessment, we found that without including FC in the assessment of biotic disruption, 12 ecosystems representing over 11% of forested area in 2015 would not have been assigned a threat status, and an additional 9 ecosystems would have a lower threat status. Our overall assessment of ecosystems found about half of all Congo Basin ecosystem types, accounting for 20% of all forest area are threatened to some degree, including 4 ecosystems (<1% of total area) which are critically engendered. FC is a transferrable and scalable assessment to support forest monitoring, planning, and management. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/598096/1/Shapiro_EI_2021.pdf text cc_by_nc_nd info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107268 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107268 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107268 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107268