Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua

In Central Nicaragua, in a rural landscape where trees grow everywhere, we studied the relations between land uses and the perception of ecosystem services (ES) provision by farmers. We worked in 3 municipalities and interviewed more than 100 households distributed among 10 communities, from 2016 to 2018. During gender specific focus groups we produced participatory maps of land uses (following Braslow et al. 2016), localized ES with the Pebble Distribution Method (described by Sheil et al. 2002), and analyzed land tenure issues using the analysis grid for land tenure proposed by Le Roy et al. (1996). Participatory observation (as detailed by Jankowski y Sabourin 2012) and semi-structured interviews (Newing 2010; Sibelet et al. 2013) were used to analyze livelihoods conditions, households' economies (data later analyzed with the support of Olympe software), and determining factors regarding land uses and tree planting. Results prove no relation between land tenure security and the plantation of trees. Land occupation by any farming system with or without trees, such as food crop or pasture, is informally recognized as proof of ownership. Farmers plant trees around their house, in pastures or on the borders of paths, for the high value they attached to them. Trees provide goods (timber, fuel wood, fruits, medicine…) and services (preservation of soils and water resources, regulation of pests and diseases, action on the local climate), and are also recognized for their social value. With the same logic, both women and men recognized forest as the main land use regarding ES provision. By contrast, they consider it of less interest than agricultural land uses regarding household's income and livelihoods. Logging is not a well-remunerated activity, and the forestry law imposes strong restrictions to timber sale. Women and men farmers perceived that forests are important for soil, water and biodiversity preservation. They may provide fuel wood and timber for family needs, but these are also provided by trees in agroforestry systems and elsewhere in the farm. Indeed, fuel wood is more often collected in agroforestry systems, including sylvopastoral ones, as are fruits and medicines. Timber trees might be preserved when opening new agricultural lands over forests, for later use, and timber species spontaneous regrowth in agricultural lands might be protected by farmers. Forests poorly contribute to the household's livelihood, trees within agroforestry systems provide the same ES than forests, and deforestation for agricultural land use conversion is a way to gain access to land. For these three reasons forests are converted into agricultural land uses until only remaining in locations of poor agricultural value. Because farmers value trees, these are preserved and even planted within agricultural lands, leading to a rich variety of agroforestry systems. As a result, agroforestry systems replace forests for their higher economic value to farmers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feintrenie, Laurene, Cifuentes Espinosa, Jaime Andrés, Dos Santos Moreira, Nayara, Bustillo Vazquez, Esther, Sibelet, Nicole, Gutiérrez-Montes, Isabel, Vermeulen, Cédric
Format: conference_item biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: CIRAD
Subjects:K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, E11 - Économie et politique foncières, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, E80 - Économie familiale et artisanale, système sylvopastoral, services écosystémiques, utilisation des terres, arbre forestier, revenu complémentaire, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16097, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3052, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5208, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592650/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592650/1/Feintrenie-Sibelet_2019_Farmers-Value-trees-ES-Nicaragua-WAC-Com-Abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-592650
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E80 - Économie familiale et artisanale
système sylvopastoral
services écosystémiques
utilisation des terres
arbre forestier
revenu complémentaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16097
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3052
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5208
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E80 - Économie familiale et artisanale
système sylvopastoral
services écosystémiques
utilisation des terres
arbre forestier
revenu complémentaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16097
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3052
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5208
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
spellingShingle K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E80 - Économie familiale et artisanale
système sylvopastoral
services écosystémiques
utilisation des terres
arbre forestier
revenu complémentaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16097
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3052
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5208
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E80 - Économie familiale et artisanale
système sylvopastoral
services écosystémiques
utilisation des terres
arbre forestier
revenu complémentaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16097
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3052
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5208
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
Feintrenie, Laurene
Cifuentes Espinosa, Jaime Andrés
Dos Santos Moreira, Nayara
Bustillo Vazquez, Esther
Sibelet, Nicole
Gutiérrez-Montes, Isabel
Vermeulen, Cédric
Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua
description In Central Nicaragua, in a rural landscape where trees grow everywhere, we studied the relations between land uses and the perception of ecosystem services (ES) provision by farmers. We worked in 3 municipalities and interviewed more than 100 households distributed among 10 communities, from 2016 to 2018. During gender specific focus groups we produced participatory maps of land uses (following Braslow et al. 2016), localized ES with the Pebble Distribution Method (described by Sheil et al. 2002), and analyzed land tenure issues using the analysis grid for land tenure proposed by Le Roy et al. (1996). Participatory observation (as detailed by Jankowski y Sabourin 2012) and semi-structured interviews (Newing 2010; Sibelet et al. 2013) were used to analyze livelihoods conditions, households' economies (data later analyzed with the support of Olympe software), and determining factors regarding land uses and tree planting. Results prove no relation between land tenure security and the plantation of trees. Land occupation by any farming system with or without trees, such as food crop or pasture, is informally recognized as proof of ownership. Farmers plant trees around their house, in pastures or on the borders of paths, for the high value they attached to them. Trees provide goods (timber, fuel wood, fruits, medicine…) and services (preservation of soils and water resources, regulation of pests and diseases, action on the local climate), and are also recognized for their social value. With the same logic, both women and men recognized forest as the main land use regarding ES provision. By contrast, they consider it of less interest than agricultural land uses regarding household's income and livelihoods. Logging is not a well-remunerated activity, and the forestry law imposes strong restrictions to timber sale. Women and men farmers perceived that forests are important for soil, water and biodiversity preservation. They may provide fuel wood and timber for family needs, but these are also provided by trees in agroforestry systems and elsewhere in the farm. Indeed, fuel wood is more often collected in agroforestry systems, including sylvopastoral ones, as are fruits and medicines. Timber trees might be preserved when opening new agricultural lands over forests, for later use, and timber species spontaneous regrowth in agricultural lands might be protected by farmers. Forests poorly contribute to the household's livelihood, trees within agroforestry systems provide the same ES than forests, and deforestation for agricultural land use conversion is a way to gain access to land. For these three reasons forests are converted into agricultural land uses until only remaining in locations of poor agricultural value. Because farmers value trees, these are preserved and even planted within agricultural lands, leading to a rich variety of agroforestry systems. As a result, agroforestry systems replace forests for their higher economic value to farmers.
format conference_item
topic_facet K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E80 - Économie familiale et artisanale
système sylvopastoral
services écosystémiques
utilisation des terres
arbre forestier
revenu complémentaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16097
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3052
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5208
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
author Feintrenie, Laurene
Cifuentes Espinosa, Jaime Andrés
Dos Santos Moreira, Nayara
Bustillo Vazquez, Esther
Sibelet, Nicole
Gutiérrez-Montes, Isabel
Vermeulen, Cédric
author_facet Feintrenie, Laurene
Cifuentes Espinosa, Jaime Andrés
Dos Santos Moreira, Nayara
Bustillo Vazquez, Esther
Sibelet, Nicole
Gutiérrez-Montes, Isabel
Vermeulen, Cédric
author_sort Feintrenie, Laurene
title Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua
title_short Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua
title_full Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua
title_fullStr Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua
title_full_unstemmed Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua
title_sort forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in nicaragua
publisher CIRAD
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592650/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592650/1/Feintrenie-Sibelet_2019_Farmers-Value-trees-ES-Nicaragua-WAC-Com-Abstract.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT feintrenielaurene forestoragroforestrysystemsfarmersvaluetreesforecosystemservicesprovisioninnicaragua
AT cifuentesespinosajaimeandres forestoragroforestrysystemsfarmersvaluetreesforecosystemservicesprovisioninnicaragua
AT dossantosmoreiranayara forestoragroforestrysystemsfarmersvaluetreesforecosystemservicesprovisioninnicaragua
AT bustillovazquezesther forestoragroforestrysystemsfarmersvaluetreesforecosystemservicesprovisioninnicaragua
AT sibeletnicole forestoragroforestrysystemsfarmersvaluetreesforecosystemservicesprovisioninnicaragua
AT gutierrezmontesisabel forestoragroforestrysystemsfarmersvaluetreesforecosystemservicesprovisioninnicaragua
AT vermeulencedric forestoragroforestrysystemsfarmersvaluetreesforecosystemservicesprovisioninnicaragua
_version_ 1792499749298896896
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5926502024-01-29T02:00:54Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592650/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592650/ Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua. Feintrenie Laurene, Cifuentes Espinosa Jaime Andrés, Dos Santos Moreira Nayara, Bustillo Vazquez Esther, Sibelet Nicole, Gutiérrez-Montes Isabel, Vermeulen Cédric. 2019. In : 4th World Congress on Agroforestry. Book of abstracts. Dupraz Christian (ed.), Gosme Marie (ed.), Lawson Gerry (ed.). CIRAD, INRA, World Agroforestry, Agropolis International, MUSE. Montpellier : CIRAD-INRA, Résumé, p. 431. World Congress on Agroforestry. 4, Montpellier, France, 20 Mai 2019/22 Mai 2019.https://agroforestry2019.cirad.fr/news-press <https://agroforestry2019.cirad.fr/news-press> Forest or agroforestry systems, farmers value trees for ecosystem services provision in Nicaragua Feintrenie, Laurene Cifuentes Espinosa, Jaime Andrés Dos Santos Moreira, Nayara Bustillo Vazquez, Esther Sibelet, Nicole Gutiérrez-Montes, Isabel Vermeulen, Cédric eng 2019 CIRAD 4th World Congress on Agroforestry. Book of abstracts K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales E11 - Économie et politique foncières P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E80 - Économie familiale et artisanale système sylvopastoral services écosystémiques utilisation des terres arbre forestier revenu complémentaire http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16097 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3052 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5208 Nicaragua http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171 In Central Nicaragua, in a rural landscape where trees grow everywhere, we studied the relations between land uses and the perception of ecosystem services (ES) provision by farmers. We worked in 3 municipalities and interviewed more than 100 households distributed among 10 communities, from 2016 to 2018. During gender specific focus groups we produced participatory maps of land uses (following Braslow et al. 2016), localized ES with the Pebble Distribution Method (described by Sheil et al. 2002), and analyzed land tenure issues using the analysis grid for land tenure proposed by Le Roy et al. (1996). Participatory observation (as detailed by Jankowski y Sabourin 2012) and semi-structured interviews (Newing 2010; Sibelet et al. 2013) were used to analyze livelihoods conditions, households' economies (data later analyzed with the support of Olympe software), and determining factors regarding land uses and tree planting. Results prove no relation between land tenure security and the plantation of trees. Land occupation by any farming system with or without trees, such as food crop or pasture, is informally recognized as proof of ownership. Farmers plant trees around their house, in pastures or on the borders of paths, for the high value they attached to them. Trees provide goods (timber, fuel wood, fruits, medicine…) and services (preservation of soils and water resources, regulation of pests and diseases, action on the local climate), and are also recognized for their social value. With the same logic, both women and men recognized forest as the main land use regarding ES provision. By contrast, they consider it of less interest than agricultural land uses regarding household's income and livelihoods. Logging is not a well-remunerated activity, and the forestry law imposes strong restrictions to timber sale. Women and men farmers perceived that forests are important for soil, water and biodiversity preservation. They may provide fuel wood and timber for family needs, but these are also provided by trees in agroforestry systems and elsewhere in the farm. Indeed, fuel wood is more often collected in agroforestry systems, including sylvopastoral ones, as are fruits and medicines. Timber trees might be preserved when opening new agricultural lands over forests, for later use, and timber species spontaneous regrowth in agricultural lands might be protected by farmers. Forests poorly contribute to the household's livelihood, trees within agroforestry systems provide the same ES than forests, and deforestation for agricultural land use conversion is a way to gain access to land. For these three reasons forests are converted into agricultural land uses until only remaining in locations of poor agricultural value. Because farmers value trees, these are preserved and even planted within agricultural lands, leading to a rich variety of agroforestry systems. As a result, agroforestry systems replace forests for their higher economic value to farmers. conference_item info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592650/1/Feintrenie-Sibelet_2019_Farmers-Value-trees-ES-Nicaragua-WAC-Com-Abstract.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://agroforestry2019.cirad.fr/news-press http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592794/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://agroforestry2019.cirad.fr/news-press