Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?

Why does the governance of pastoral systems need to be based on coviability? Below, brief comments are presented about the coviability concept in pastoral systems: a collective approach of viability due to: first, the permanent interactions between farming systems at various scales (household, family, tribe), and secondly the need to establish rules to avoid the tragedy of commons. Based on pastoral systems located in five contrasted contexts from bioclimatic and socio-economic points of view (Tibetan Plateau, Mediterranean, Sahel, Pampa and South Patagonia), the authors describe the strong interactions between the farming systems at different scales in diverse domains: herd management, innovation, strategies to face risks, marketing, lobbying, social and cultural issues, etc. Then, they demonstrate how the local societies progressively have been constrained to established rules to access the rangeland, firstly when resources were not sufficient (tragedy of the commons) and more recently with the new environmental challenge leading to functional integrity which is coviability at the level of the rangeland management. Indeed, functional integrity refers to the collective level in the sustainable management of rangeland resources: coordination, short and long term planning of the use of resources, promoting ecosystem services, control and prevention of conflicts, considering the hopes and the fears of the local people, etc. The authors conclude with three scenarios for pastoral systems according to the level of sustainable rangeland management goals and coviability adopted by breeder societies at a local scale: rapid disappearance in the global market, resistance and protection as heritage, sustainable rangeland management and gold coviability based on functional integrity.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taher Srairi, Mohamed, Tourrand, Jean-François, Long, Ruijun, Faye, Adama, Grosskopf, Hermes Morales, Coronato, Fernando Raul, Corniaux, Christian, Hubert, Bernard
Format: book_section biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Springer
Subjects:L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, pastoralisme, système d'exploitation agricole, terre communale, gouvernance, gestion des ressources naturelles, pâturages, services écosystémiques, approche participative, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/1/ID592021.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-592021
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
pastoralisme
système d'exploitation agricole
terre communale
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
pâturages
services écosystémiques
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
pastoralisme
système d'exploitation agricole
terre communale
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
pâturages
services écosystémiques
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734
spellingShingle L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
pastoralisme
système d'exploitation agricole
terre communale
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
pâturages
services écosystémiques
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
pastoralisme
système d'exploitation agricole
terre communale
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
pâturages
services écosystémiques
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734
Taher Srairi, Mohamed
Tourrand, Jean-François
Long, Ruijun
Faye, Adama
Grosskopf, Hermes Morales
Coronato, Fernando Raul
Corniaux, Christian
Hubert, Bernard
Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
description Why does the governance of pastoral systems need to be based on coviability? Below, brief comments are presented about the coviability concept in pastoral systems: a collective approach of viability due to: first, the permanent interactions between farming systems at various scales (household, family, tribe), and secondly the need to establish rules to avoid the tragedy of commons. Based on pastoral systems located in five contrasted contexts from bioclimatic and socio-economic points of view (Tibetan Plateau, Mediterranean, Sahel, Pampa and South Patagonia), the authors describe the strong interactions between the farming systems at different scales in diverse domains: herd management, innovation, strategies to face risks, marketing, lobbying, social and cultural issues, etc. Then, they demonstrate how the local societies progressively have been constrained to established rules to access the rangeland, firstly when resources were not sufficient (tragedy of the commons) and more recently with the new environmental challenge leading to functional integrity which is coviability at the level of the rangeland management. Indeed, functional integrity refers to the collective level in the sustainable management of rangeland resources: coordination, short and long term planning of the use of resources, promoting ecosystem services, control and prevention of conflicts, considering the hopes and the fears of the local people, etc. The authors conclude with three scenarios for pastoral systems according to the level of sustainable rangeland management goals and coviability adopted by breeder societies at a local scale: rapid disappearance in the global market, resistance and protection as heritage, sustainable rangeland management and gold coviability based on functional integrity.
format book_section
topic_facet L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
pastoralisme
système d'exploitation agricole
terre communale
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
pâturages
services écosystémiques
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734
author Taher Srairi, Mohamed
Tourrand, Jean-François
Long, Ruijun
Faye, Adama
Grosskopf, Hermes Morales
Coronato, Fernando Raul
Corniaux, Christian
Hubert, Bernard
author_facet Taher Srairi, Mohamed
Tourrand, Jean-François
Long, Ruijun
Faye, Adama
Grosskopf, Hermes Morales
Coronato, Fernando Raul
Corniaux, Christian
Hubert, Bernard
author_sort Taher Srairi, Mohamed
title Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
title_short Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
title_full Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
title_fullStr Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
title_full_unstemmed Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
title_sort coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. how does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
publisher Springer
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/1/ID592021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tahersrairimohamed coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
AT tourrandjeanfrancois coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
AT longruijun coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
AT fayeadama coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
AT grosskopfhermesmorales coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
AT coronatofernandoraul coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
AT corniauxchristian coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
AT hubertbernard coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept
_version_ 1792499703384899584
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5920212024-01-29T01:50:42Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/ Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? Taher Srairi Mohamed, Tourrand Jean-François, Long Ruijun, Faye Adama, Grosskopf Hermes Morales, Coronato Fernando Raul, Corniaux Christian, Hubert Bernard. 2018. In : Coviability of social and ecological systems: reconnecting mankind to the biosphere in an era of global change. Vol. 1: The foundations of a new paradigm. Barrière Olivier (ed), Behnassi Mohamed (ed.), Douzal Vincent (ed.), Fargette Mireille (ed.), Libourel Thérèse (ed.), Loireau Maud (ed.), Pascal Laurence (ed.), Prost Catherine (ed.), Ravena-Cañete Voyner (ed.), Seyler Frédérique (ed.), Morand Serge (ed.). Cham : Springer, 387-409. ISBN 978-3-319-78496-0https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16> Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? Taher Srairi, Mohamed Tourrand, Jean-François Long, Ruijun Faye, Adama Grosskopf, Hermes Morales Coronato, Fernando Raul Corniaux, Christian Hubert, Bernard eng 2018 Springer Coviability of social and ecological systems: reconnecting mankind to the biosphere in an era of global change. Vol. 1: The foundations of a new paradigm L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières pastoralisme système d'exploitation agricole terre communale gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles pâturages services écosystémiques approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 Sénégal Égypte Uruguay Argentine Tibet Sahel http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734 Why does the governance of pastoral systems need to be based on coviability? Below, brief comments are presented about the coviability concept in pastoral systems: a collective approach of viability due to: first, the permanent interactions between farming systems at various scales (household, family, tribe), and secondly the need to establish rules to avoid the tragedy of commons. Based on pastoral systems located in five contrasted contexts from bioclimatic and socio-economic points of view (Tibetan Plateau, Mediterranean, Sahel, Pampa and South Patagonia), the authors describe the strong interactions between the farming systems at different scales in diverse domains: herd management, innovation, strategies to face risks, marketing, lobbying, social and cultural issues, etc. Then, they demonstrate how the local societies progressively have been constrained to established rules to access the rangeland, firstly when resources were not sufficient (tragedy of the commons) and more recently with the new environmental challenge leading to functional integrity which is coviability at the level of the rangeland management. Indeed, functional integrity refers to the collective level in the sustainable management of rangeland resources: coordination, short and long term planning of the use of resources, promoting ecosystem services, control and prevention of conflicts, considering the hopes and the fears of the local people, etc. The authors conclude with three scenarios for pastoral systems according to the level of sustainable rangeland management goals and coviability adopted by breeder societies at a local scale: rapid disappearance in the global market, resistance and protection as heritage, sustainable rangeland management and gold coviability based on functional integrity. book_section info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart Chapter info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/1/ID592021.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592079/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16