Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept?
Why does the governance of pastoral systems need to be based on coviability? Below, brief comments are presented about the coviability concept in pastoral systems: a collective approach of viability due to: first, the permanent interactions between farming systems at various scales (household, family, tribe), and secondly the need to establish rules to avoid the tragedy of commons. Based on pastoral systems located in five contrasted contexts from bioclimatic and socio-economic points of view (Tibetan Plateau, Mediterranean, Sahel, Pampa and South Patagonia), the authors describe the strong interactions between the farming systems at different scales in diverse domains: herd management, innovation, strategies to face risks, marketing, lobbying, social and cultural issues, etc. Then, they demonstrate how the local societies progressively have been constrained to established rules to access the rangeland, firstly when resources were not sufficient (tragedy of the commons) and more recently with the new environmental challenge leading to functional integrity which is coviability at the level of the rangeland management. Indeed, functional integrity refers to the collective level in the sustainable management of rangeland resources: coordination, short and long term planning of the use of resources, promoting ecosystem services, control and prevention of conflicts, considering the hopes and the fears of the local people, etc. The authors conclude with three scenarios for pastoral systems according to the level of sustainable rangeland management goals and coviability adopted by breeder societies at a local scale: rapid disappearance in the global market, resistance and protection as heritage, sustainable rangeland management and gold coviability based on functional integrity.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-592021 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières pastoralisme système d'exploitation agricole terre communale gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles pâturages services écosystémiques approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734 L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières pastoralisme système d'exploitation agricole terre communale gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles pâturages services écosystémiques approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734 |
spellingShingle |
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières pastoralisme système d'exploitation agricole terre communale gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles pâturages services écosystémiques approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734 L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières pastoralisme système d'exploitation agricole terre communale gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles pâturages services écosystémiques approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734 Taher Srairi, Mohamed Tourrand, Jean-François Long, Ruijun Faye, Adama Grosskopf, Hermes Morales Coronato, Fernando Raul Corniaux, Christian Hubert, Bernard Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? |
description |
Why does the governance of pastoral systems need to be based on coviability? Below, brief comments are presented about the coviability concept in pastoral systems: a collective approach of viability due to: first, the permanent interactions between farming systems at various scales (household, family, tribe), and secondly the need to establish rules to avoid the tragedy of commons. Based on pastoral systems located in five contrasted contexts from bioclimatic and socio-economic points of view (Tibetan Plateau, Mediterranean, Sahel, Pampa and South Patagonia), the authors describe the strong interactions between the farming systems at different scales in diverse domains: herd management, innovation, strategies to face risks, marketing, lobbying, social and cultural issues, etc. Then, they demonstrate how the local societies progressively have been constrained to established rules to access the rangeland, firstly when resources were not sufficient (tragedy of the commons) and more recently with the new environmental challenge leading to functional integrity which is coviability at the level of the rangeland management. Indeed, functional integrity refers to the collective level in the sustainable management of rangeland resources: coordination, short and long term planning of the use of resources, promoting ecosystem services, control and prevention of conflicts, considering the hopes and the fears of the local people, etc. The authors conclude with three scenarios for pastoral systems according to the level of sustainable rangeland management goals and coviability adopted by breeder societies at a local scale: rapid disappearance in the global market, resistance and protection as heritage, sustainable rangeland management and gold coviability based on functional integrity. |
format |
book_section |
topic_facet |
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières pastoralisme système d'exploitation agricole terre communale gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles pâturages services écosystémiques approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734 |
author |
Taher Srairi, Mohamed Tourrand, Jean-François Long, Ruijun Faye, Adama Grosskopf, Hermes Morales Coronato, Fernando Raul Corniaux, Christian Hubert, Bernard |
author_facet |
Taher Srairi, Mohamed Tourrand, Jean-François Long, Ruijun Faye, Adama Grosskopf, Hermes Morales Coronato, Fernando Raul Corniaux, Christian Hubert, Bernard |
author_sort |
Taher Srairi, Mohamed |
title |
Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? |
title_short |
Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? |
title_full |
Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? |
title_fullStr |
Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? |
title_sort |
coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. how does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? |
publisher |
Springer |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/1/ID592021.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tahersrairimohamed coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept AT tourrandjeanfrancois coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept AT longruijun coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept AT fayeadama coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept AT grosskopfhermesmorales coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept AT coronatofernandoraul coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept AT corniauxchristian coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept AT hubertbernard coviabilityinthegovernanceofpastoralsystemspermanenceandchangehowdoesthegovernanceofpastoralsystemsappealtothecoviabilityconcept |
_version_ |
1792499703384899584 |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5920212024-01-29T01:50:42Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/ Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? Taher Srairi Mohamed, Tourrand Jean-François, Long Ruijun, Faye Adama, Grosskopf Hermes Morales, Coronato Fernando Raul, Corniaux Christian, Hubert Bernard. 2018. In : Coviability of social and ecological systems: reconnecting mankind to the biosphere in an era of global change. Vol. 1: The foundations of a new paradigm. Barrière Olivier (ed), Behnassi Mohamed (ed.), Douzal Vincent (ed.), Fargette Mireille (ed.), Libourel Thérèse (ed.), Loireau Maud (ed.), Pascal Laurence (ed.), Prost Catherine (ed.), Ravena-Cañete Voyner (ed.), Seyler Frédérique (ed.), Morand Serge (ed.). Cham : Springer, 387-409. ISBN 978-3-319-78496-0https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16> Coviability in the governance of pastoral systems, permanence and change. How does the governance of pastoral systems appeal to the coviability concept? Taher Srairi, Mohamed Tourrand, Jean-François Long, Ruijun Faye, Adama Grosskopf, Hermes Morales Coronato, Fernando Raul Corniaux, Christian Hubert, Bernard eng 2018 Springer Coviability of social and ecological systems: reconnecting mankind to the biosphere in an era of global change. Vol. 1: The foundations of a new paradigm L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières pastoralisme système d'exploitation agricole terre communale gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles pâturages services écosystémiques approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1782 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5626 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 Sénégal Égypte Uruguay Argentine Tibet Sahel http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2503 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_603 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7762 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6734 Why does the governance of pastoral systems need to be based on coviability? Below, brief comments are presented about the coviability concept in pastoral systems: a collective approach of viability due to: first, the permanent interactions between farming systems at various scales (household, family, tribe), and secondly the need to establish rules to avoid the tragedy of commons. Based on pastoral systems located in five contrasted contexts from bioclimatic and socio-economic points of view (Tibetan Plateau, Mediterranean, Sahel, Pampa and South Patagonia), the authors describe the strong interactions between the farming systems at different scales in diverse domains: herd management, innovation, strategies to face risks, marketing, lobbying, social and cultural issues, etc. Then, they demonstrate how the local societies progressively have been constrained to established rules to access the rangeland, firstly when resources were not sufficient (tragedy of the commons) and more recently with the new environmental challenge leading to functional integrity which is coviability at the level of the rangeland management. Indeed, functional integrity refers to the collective level in the sustainable management of rangeland resources: coordination, short and long term planning of the use of resources, promoting ecosystem services, control and prevention of conflicts, considering the hopes and the fears of the local people, etc. The authors conclude with three scenarios for pastoral systems according to the level of sustainable rangeland management goals and coviability adopted by breeder societies at a local scale: rapid disappearance in the global market, resistance and protection as heritage, sustainable rangeland management and gold coviability based on functional integrity. book_section info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart Chapter info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592021/1/ID592021.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 http://agritrop.cirad.fr/592079/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_16 |