What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol
Background: Many infectious pathogens can be transmitted from animals to humans and vice versa, or by animals (especially arthropods) to humans. Such diseases are called zoonotic and/or vector-borne diseases. To control or prevent them, it is often recommended to target population reduction of host or vector species, through preventive culling or insecticide use for example. But these types of destructive interventions have shown several limits altering their efficiency, including acquired resistance of arthropods to insecticides, unpredicted change in the ecology of host populations, unexpected negative functional consequences on ecosystems, as well as economic embrittlement when livestock is concerned. An alternative pathway of action would be to rely on the functioning of ecosystems, and on their careful management, to regulate diseases and thus reduce their impact on human health. In this perspective, a thorough evaluation of the conditions that can potentially promote such a positive regulation of infectious pathogens by ecosystems, and their efficiency, is needed. Here, we present the protocol of a systematic review that will evaluate the scientific evidence existing on potential links between ecosystem components or functions and 14 vector-borne and zoonotic diseases impacting human health. Methods: We will search for studies that tested the effect of changes in (i) biological communities, and (ii) habitats and landscapes, on diseases. Scientific literature from 5 publication databases will be screened in a 3-rounds process: title, abstract and full-text screening. At each stage, articles will be either rejected or kept for the next round, depending on whether they fall in the exclusion or inclusion criteria. We will present results in two parts: a systematic map and a systematic review. The systematic map will present, for the 14 diseases, the number of publications, their geographical distribution, the type of ecosystem component/function they studied, as well as the host(s) in which epidemiological measurements have been performed. From this systematic map, we will identify groups of articles that allow for critical appraisal, i.e. groups of articles that studied the effect of the same ecosystem component/function on the same disease. Only those articles will be included in the systematic review. The validity of these articles will be assessed by critical appraisal and presented as a narrative synthesis with confidence levels.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | article biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | L73 - Maladies des animaux, S50 - Santé humaine, C30 - Documentation et information, maladie infectieuse, zoonose, écosystème, approche écosystémique, facteur écologique, paysage, santé animale, santé publique, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8530, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2482, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331454, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36389, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4185, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_431, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6349, |
Online Access: | http://agritrop.cirad.fr/590944/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/590944/1/Lugassy%20et%20al%202019_s13750-019-0147-5.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cirad-fr-590944 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
L73 - Maladies des animaux S50 - Santé humaine C30 - Documentation et information maladie infectieuse zoonose écosystème approche écosystémique facteur écologique paysage santé animale santé publique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8530 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2482 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331454 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36389 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4185 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_431 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6349 L73 - Maladies des animaux S50 - Santé humaine C30 - Documentation et information maladie infectieuse zoonose écosystème approche écosystémique facteur écologique paysage santé animale santé publique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8530 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2482 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331454 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36389 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4185 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_431 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6349 |
spellingShingle |
L73 - Maladies des animaux S50 - Santé humaine C30 - Documentation et information maladie infectieuse zoonose écosystème approche écosystémique facteur écologique paysage santé animale santé publique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8530 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2482 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331454 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36389 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4185 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_431 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6349 L73 - Maladies des animaux S50 - Santé humaine C30 - Documentation et information maladie infectieuse zoonose écosystème approche écosystémique facteur écologique paysage santé animale santé publique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8530 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2482 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331454 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36389 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4185 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_431 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6349 Lugassy, Léa Amdouni-Boursier, Ludivine Alout, Haoues Berrebi, Romuald Boëte, Christophe Boué, Franck Boulanger, Nathalie Cosson, Jean François Durand, Thierry De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel Larrat, Sylvain Moinet, Marie Moulia, Catherine Pagès, Nonito Plantard, Olivier Robert, Vincent Livoreil, Barbara What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol |
description |
Background: Many infectious pathogens can be transmitted from animals to humans and vice versa, or by animals (especially arthropods) to humans. Such diseases are called zoonotic and/or vector-borne diseases. To control or prevent them, it is often recommended to target population reduction of host or vector species, through preventive culling or insecticide use for example. But these types of destructive interventions have shown several limits altering their efficiency, including acquired resistance of arthropods to insecticides, unpredicted change in the ecology of host populations, unexpected negative functional consequences on ecosystems, as well as economic embrittlement when livestock is concerned. An alternative pathway of action would be to rely on the functioning of ecosystems, and on their careful management, to regulate diseases and thus reduce their impact on human health. In this perspective, a thorough evaluation of the conditions that can potentially promote such a positive regulation of infectious pathogens by ecosystems, and their efficiency, is needed. Here, we present the protocol of a systematic review that will evaluate the scientific evidence existing on potential links between ecosystem components or functions and 14 vector-borne and zoonotic diseases impacting human health. Methods: We will search for studies that tested the effect of changes in (i) biological communities, and (ii) habitats and landscapes, on diseases. Scientific literature from 5 publication databases will be screened in a 3-rounds process: title, abstract and full-text screening. At each stage, articles will be either rejected or kept for the next round, depending on whether they fall in the exclusion or inclusion criteria. We will present results in two parts: a systematic map and a systematic review. The systematic map will present, for the 14 diseases, the number of publications, their geographical distribution, the type of ecosystem component/function they studied, as well as the host(s) in which epidemiological measurements have been performed. From this systematic map, we will identify groups of articles that allow for critical appraisal, i.e. groups of articles that studied the effect of the same ecosystem component/function on the same disease. Only those articles will be included in the systematic review. The validity of these articles will be assessed by critical appraisal and presented as a narrative synthesis with confidence levels. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
L73 - Maladies des animaux S50 - Santé humaine C30 - Documentation et information maladie infectieuse zoonose écosystème approche écosystémique facteur écologique paysage santé animale santé publique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8530 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2482 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331454 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36389 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4185 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_431 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6349 |
author |
Lugassy, Léa Amdouni-Boursier, Ludivine Alout, Haoues Berrebi, Romuald Boëte, Christophe Boué, Franck Boulanger, Nathalie Cosson, Jean François Durand, Thierry De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel Larrat, Sylvain Moinet, Marie Moulia, Catherine Pagès, Nonito Plantard, Olivier Robert, Vincent Livoreil, Barbara |
author_facet |
Lugassy, Léa Amdouni-Boursier, Ludivine Alout, Haoues Berrebi, Romuald Boëte, Christophe Boué, Franck Boulanger, Nathalie Cosson, Jean François Durand, Thierry De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel Larrat, Sylvain Moinet, Marie Moulia, Catherine Pagès, Nonito Plantard, Olivier Robert, Vincent Livoreil, Barbara |
author_sort |
Lugassy, Léa |
title |
What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol |
title_short |
What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol |
title_full |
What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr |
What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol |
title_sort |
what is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? a systematic review protocol |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/590944/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/590944/1/Lugassy%20et%20al%202019_s13750-019-0147-5.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lugassylea whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT amdouniboursierludivine whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT alouthaoues whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT berrebiromuald whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT boetechristophe whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT bouefranck whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT boulangernathalie whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT cossonjeanfrancois whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT durandthierry whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT degarinewichatitskymichel whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT larratsylvain whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT moinetmarie whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT mouliacatherine whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT pagesnonito whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT plantardolivier whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT robertvincent whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT livoreilbarbara whatistheevidencethatecosystemcomponentsorfunctionshaveanimpactoninfectiousdiseasesasystematicreviewprotocol |
_version_ |
1792499636982775808 |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5909442024-01-29T01:35:34Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/590944/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/590944/ What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol. Lugassy Léa, Amdouni-Boursier Ludivine, Alout Haoues, Berrebi Romuald, Boëte Christophe, Boué Franck, Boulanger Nathalie, Cosson Jean François, Durand Thierry, De Garine-Wichatitsky Michel, Larrat Sylvain, Moinet Marie, Moulia Catherine, Pagès Nonito, Plantard Olivier, Robert Vincent, Livoreil Barbara. 2019. Environmental Evidence, 8:4, 11 p.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0147-5 <https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0147-5> What is the evidence that ecosystem components or functions have an impact on infectious diseases? A systematic review protocol Lugassy, Léa Amdouni-Boursier, Ludivine Alout, Haoues Berrebi, Romuald Boëte, Christophe Boué, Franck Boulanger, Nathalie Cosson, Jean François Durand, Thierry De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel Larrat, Sylvain Moinet, Marie Moulia, Catherine Pagès, Nonito Plantard, Olivier Robert, Vincent Livoreil, Barbara eng 2019 Environmental Evidence L73 - Maladies des animaux S50 - Santé humaine C30 - Documentation et information maladie infectieuse zoonose écosystème approche écosystémique facteur écologique paysage santé animale santé publique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8530 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2482 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331454 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36389 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4185 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_431 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6349 Background: Many infectious pathogens can be transmitted from animals to humans and vice versa, or by animals (especially arthropods) to humans. Such diseases are called zoonotic and/or vector-borne diseases. To control or prevent them, it is often recommended to target population reduction of host or vector species, through preventive culling or insecticide use for example. But these types of destructive interventions have shown several limits altering their efficiency, including acquired resistance of arthropods to insecticides, unpredicted change in the ecology of host populations, unexpected negative functional consequences on ecosystems, as well as economic embrittlement when livestock is concerned. An alternative pathway of action would be to rely on the functioning of ecosystems, and on their careful management, to regulate diseases and thus reduce their impact on human health. In this perspective, a thorough evaluation of the conditions that can potentially promote such a positive regulation of infectious pathogens by ecosystems, and their efficiency, is needed. Here, we present the protocol of a systematic review that will evaluate the scientific evidence existing on potential links between ecosystem components or functions and 14 vector-borne and zoonotic diseases impacting human health. Methods: We will search for studies that tested the effect of changes in (i) biological communities, and (ii) habitats and landscapes, on diseases. Scientific literature from 5 publication databases will be screened in a 3-rounds process: title, abstract and full-text screening. At each stage, articles will be either rejected or kept for the next round, depending on whether they fall in the exclusion or inclusion criteria. We will present results in two parts: a systematic map and a systematic review. The systematic map will present, for the 14 diseases, the number of publications, their geographical distribution, the type of ecosystem component/function they studied, as well as the host(s) in which epidemiological measurements have been performed. From this systematic map, we will identify groups of articles that allow for critical appraisal, i.e. groups of articles that studied the effect of the same ecosystem component/function on the same disease. Only those articles will be included in the systematic review. The validity of these articles will be assessed by critical appraisal and presented as a narrative synthesis with confidence levels. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/590944/1/Lugassy%20et%20al%202019_s13750-019-0147-5.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0147-5 10.1186/s13750-019-0147-5 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s13750-019-0147-5 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0147-5 info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/purl/https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/MOESM1_of_What_is_the_evidence_that_ecosystem_components_or_functions_have_an_impact_on_infectious_diseases_A_systematic_review_protocol/7612280 |