Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava
The rapid expansion of perennial crops is a major threat to biodiversity in Southeast Asia. The biodiversity losses related to the conversion of forest lands to oil palm or rubber plantations (RP) are well documented by recent studies. However, the impact of the conversion from intensively managed annual crops to perennial crops on soil biodiversity has not yet been addressed. This study aims at assessing the impact on soil biodiversity of a) the short-term effect of land use conversion from cassava crop to RP, and b) the long-term effect of RP ageing. Soil biodiversity (bacterial, fungal and macrofaunal), microbial activities and pedoclimatic characteristics were measured over a chronosequence of 1–25 years old of RP compared to cassava fields, the former crop, in Thailand. The conversion from cassava to young RP (1–3 yr) had a significant effect on microbial biomass and activities and fungal composition, but did not impact the bacterial and macrofaunal diversity. This effect of land use conversion could be explained by the change in land management due to the cultivation of pineapple in the inter-row of the young RP. Canopy closure appeared to be the main driver of soil biota shifts, as most of the biotic parameters, composition, abundance and activities were significantly modified after 7 years of RP. The changes of composition in older rubber plantations originated from the dominance of Trichoderma (fungi), Firmicutes (bacteria), and earthworms. Old rubber plantations (23–25 yr) harboured the highest microbial and macrofaunal biomass; however, they were also characterised by a significant decrease in bacterial richness. The change in pedoclimatic conditions across the rubber chronosequence, i.e. increase in soil moisture, litter and organic carbon content, was a stronger driver of soil biota evolution than land use conversion. The macrofaunal composition was more resistant to land use conversion than the bacterial composition, whereas the microbial biomass was sensitive to land use conversion, but showed resilience after 20 years. However, bacterial, fungal and macrofaunal diversity, macrofaunal and microbial biomass and microbial activities were all sensitive to RP ageing.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-587253 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
K10 - Production forestière P34 - Biologie du sol forêt forêt tropicale manioc Hévéa régime sylvicole Houppier mycorhizé à vésicule et arbuscule texture du sol mycorhization biodiversité biologie du sol Bacteria micro-organisme utilisation des terres âge plantation forestière lumière http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9649 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3588 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7070 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16172 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24415 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7199 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36163 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7160 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_765 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_186 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4322 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7260 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 K10 - Production forestière P34 - Biologie du sol forêt forêt tropicale manioc Hévéa régime sylvicole Houppier mycorhizé à vésicule et arbuscule texture du sol mycorhization biodiversité biologie du sol Bacteria micro-organisme utilisation des terres âge plantation forestière lumière http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9649 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3588 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7070 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16172 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24415 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7199 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36163 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7160 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_765 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_186 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4322 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7260 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 |
spellingShingle |
K10 - Production forestière P34 - Biologie du sol forêt forêt tropicale manioc Hévéa régime sylvicole Houppier mycorhizé à vésicule et arbuscule texture du sol mycorhization biodiversité biologie du sol Bacteria micro-organisme utilisation des terres âge plantation forestière lumière http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9649 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3588 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7070 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16172 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24415 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7199 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36163 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7160 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_765 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_186 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4322 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7260 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 K10 - Production forestière P34 - Biologie du sol forêt forêt tropicale manioc Hévéa régime sylvicole Houppier mycorhizé à vésicule et arbuscule texture du sol mycorhization biodiversité biologie du sol Bacteria micro-organisme utilisation des terres âge plantation forestière lumière http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9649 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3588 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7070 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16172 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24415 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7199 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36163 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7160 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_765 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_186 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4322 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7260 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 Peerawat, Monrawee Blaud, Aimeric Trap, Jean Chevallier, Tiphaine Alonso, Pascal Gay, Frédéric Thaler, Philippe Spor, Ayme Sebag, David Choosai, Chutinan Suvannang, Nopmanee Sajjaphan, Kannika Brauman, Alain Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava |
description |
The rapid expansion of perennial crops is a major threat to biodiversity in Southeast Asia. The biodiversity losses related to the conversion of forest lands to oil palm or rubber plantations (RP) are well documented by recent studies. However, the impact of the conversion from intensively managed annual crops to perennial crops on soil biodiversity has not yet been addressed. This study aims at assessing the impact on soil biodiversity of a) the short-term effect of land use conversion from cassava crop to RP, and b) the long-term effect of RP ageing. Soil biodiversity (bacterial, fungal and macrofaunal), microbial activities and pedoclimatic characteristics were measured over a chronosequence of 1–25 years old of RP compared to cassava fields, the former crop, in Thailand. The conversion from cassava to young RP (1–3 yr) had a significant effect on microbial biomass and activities and fungal composition, but did not impact the bacterial and macrofaunal diversity. This effect of land use conversion could be explained by the change in land management due to the cultivation of pineapple in the inter-row of the young RP. Canopy closure appeared to be the main driver of soil biota shifts, as most of the biotic parameters, composition, abundance and activities were significantly modified after 7 years of RP. The changes of composition in older rubber plantations originated from the dominance of Trichoderma (fungi), Firmicutes (bacteria), and earthworms. Old rubber plantations (23–25 yr) harboured the highest microbial and macrofaunal biomass; however, they were also characterised by a significant decrease in bacterial richness. The change in pedoclimatic conditions across the rubber chronosequence, i.e. increase in soil moisture, litter and organic carbon content, was a stronger driver of soil biota evolution than land use conversion. The macrofaunal composition was more resistant to land use conversion than the bacterial composition, whereas the microbial biomass was sensitive to land use conversion, but showed resilience after 20 years. However, bacterial, fungal and macrofaunal diversity, macrofaunal and microbial biomass and microbial activities were all sensitive to RP ageing. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
K10 - Production forestière P34 - Biologie du sol forêt forêt tropicale manioc Hévéa régime sylvicole Houppier mycorhizé à vésicule et arbuscule texture du sol mycorhization biodiversité biologie du sol Bacteria micro-organisme utilisation des terres âge plantation forestière lumière http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9649 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3588 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7070 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16172 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24415 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7199 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36163 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7160 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_765 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_186 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4322 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7260 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 |
author |
Peerawat, Monrawee Blaud, Aimeric Trap, Jean Chevallier, Tiphaine Alonso, Pascal Gay, Frédéric Thaler, Philippe Spor, Ayme Sebag, David Choosai, Chutinan Suvannang, Nopmanee Sajjaphan, Kannika Brauman, Alain |
author_facet |
Peerawat, Monrawee Blaud, Aimeric Trap, Jean Chevallier, Tiphaine Alonso, Pascal Gay, Frédéric Thaler, Philippe Spor, Ayme Sebag, David Choosai, Chutinan Suvannang, Nopmanee Sajjaphan, Kannika Brauman, Alain |
author_sort |
Peerawat, Monrawee |
title |
Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava |
title_short |
Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava |
title_full |
Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava |
title_fullStr |
Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava |
title_sort |
rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587253/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587253/1/Peerawat%20soil%20biodiversity%20in%20rubber%20plantation.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peerawatmonrawee rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT blaudaimeric rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT trapjean rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT chevalliertiphaine rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT alonsopascal rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT gayfrederic rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT thalerphilippe rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT sporayme rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT sebagdavid rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT choosaichutinan rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT suvannangnopmanee rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT sajjaphankannika rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava AT braumanalain rubberplantationageingcontrolssoilbiodiversityafterlandconversionfromcassava |
_version_ |
1792499448184569856 |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5872532024-01-29T00:52:52Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587253/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587253/ Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava. Peerawat Monrawee, Blaud Aimeric, Trap Jean, Chevallier Tiphaine, Alonso Pascal, Gay Frédéric, Thaler Philippe, Spor Ayme, Sebag David, Choosai Chutinan, Suvannang Nopmanee, Sajjaphan Kannika, Brauman Alain. 2018. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 257 : 92-102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.034 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.034> Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava Peerawat, Monrawee Blaud, Aimeric Trap, Jean Chevallier, Tiphaine Alonso, Pascal Gay, Frédéric Thaler, Philippe Spor, Ayme Sebag, David Choosai, Chutinan Suvannang, Nopmanee Sajjaphan, Kannika Brauman, Alain eng 2018 Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment K10 - Production forestière P34 - Biologie du sol forêt forêt tropicale manioc Hévéa régime sylvicole Houppier mycorhizé à vésicule et arbuscule texture du sol mycorhization biodiversité biologie du sol Bacteria micro-organisme utilisation des terres âge plantation forestière lumière http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9649 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3588 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7070 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16172 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24415 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7199 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36163 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7160 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_765 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_186 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3048 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4322 Asie du Sud-Est Thaïlande http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7260 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 The rapid expansion of perennial crops is a major threat to biodiversity in Southeast Asia. The biodiversity losses related to the conversion of forest lands to oil palm or rubber plantations (RP) are well documented by recent studies. However, the impact of the conversion from intensively managed annual crops to perennial crops on soil biodiversity has not yet been addressed. This study aims at assessing the impact on soil biodiversity of a) the short-term effect of land use conversion from cassava crop to RP, and b) the long-term effect of RP ageing. Soil biodiversity (bacterial, fungal and macrofaunal), microbial activities and pedoclimatic characteristics were measured over a chronosequence of 1–25 years old of RP compared to cassava fields, the former crop, in Thailand. The conversion from cassava to young RP (1–3 yr) had a significant effect on microbial biomass and activities and fungal composition, but did not impact the bacterial and macrofaunal diversity. This effect of land use conversion could be explained by the change in land management due to the cultivation of pineapple in the inter-row of the young RP. Canopy closure appeared to be the main driver of soil biota shifts, as most of the biotic parameters, composition, abundance and activities were significantly modified after 7 years of RP. The changes of composition in older rubber plantations originated from the dominance of Trichoderma (fungi), Firmicutes (bacteria), and earthworms. Old rubber plantations (23–25 yr) harboured the highest microbial and macrofaunal biomass; however, they were also characterised by a significant decrease in bacterial richness. The change in pedoclimatic conditions across the rubber chronosequence, i.e. increase in soil moisture, litter and organic carbon content, was a stronger driver of soil biota evolution than land use conversion. The macrofaunal composition was more resistant to land use conversion than the bacterial composition, whereas the microbial biomass was sensitive to land use conversion, but showed resilience after 20 years. However, bacterial, fungal and macrofaunal diversity, macrofaunal and microbial biomass and microbial activities were all sensitive to RP ageing. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587253/1/Peerawat%20soil%20biodiversity%20in%20rubber%20plantation.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.034 10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.034 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.034 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.034 |