Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure
The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) initiated the GCS-Tenure project in Indonesia, Uganda and Peru conducted the study to analyze the relationships between statutory and customary land tenure and how these relationships affect tenure security of forest dependent communities, including women and other marginalized groups. Using a global comparative approach and standardized methodologies, the study analyzes the differential success or failure of policy and institutional innovations to enhance secure tenure rights. It also examines how these innovations identify strategies likely to lead to desired outcomes. The Participatory Prospective Analysis (PPA) is used as a first step by engaging key stakeholders. Through participatory meetings, all expert stakeholders progressively identify and develop a range of tenure security scenarios. They then elaborate actions in response to the scenarios identified. With the application of PPA, the research team aims to answer the following questions: What are the key factors influencing forest tenure security? What possible actions can mitigate negative implications (or reduce barriers impeding implementation) and promote positive changes (e.g. equitable access for women and marginalized groups? Who should be responsible for those actions? PPA aims to help decision makers understand the key drivers, challenges and future consequences of policy options.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-587247 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5872472024-01-29T00:52:47Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587247/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587247/ Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure. Bourgeois Robin, Liswanti Nining, Mukasa Concepta, Zamora Alejandra, Herawati Tuti, Monterroso Iliana, Mshale Baruani, Banjade Mani Ram, Mwangi Esther, Larson Anne. 2017. Bogor : CIFOR, 71 p. ISBN 978-602-387-067-7 https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006749 <https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006749> Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure Bourgeois, Robin Liswanti, Nining Mukasa, Concepta Zamora, Alejandra Herawati, Tuti Monterroso, Iliana Mshale, Baruani Banjade, Mani Ram Mwangi, Esther Larson, Anne eng 2017 CIFOR K10 - Production forestière E50 - Sociologie rurale D50 - Législation forêt forêt tropicale gestion des ressources naturelles communauté rurale femme forêt collective droit d'accès réglementation forestière approche participative protection de la forêt gouvernance http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6604 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28079 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 Indonésie Ouganda Pérou http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8038 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725 The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) initiated the GCS-Tenure project in Indonesia, Uganda and Peru conducted the study to analyze the relationships between statutory and customary land tenure and how these relationships affect tenure security of forest dependent communities, including women and other marginalized groups. Using a global comparative approach and standardized methodologies, the study analyzes the differential success or failure of policy and institutional innovations to enhance secure tenure rights. It also examines how these innovations identify strategies likely to lead to desired outcomes. The Participatory Prospective Analysis (PPA) is used as a first step by engaging key stakeholders. Through participatory meetings, all expert stakeholders progressively identify and develop a range of tenure security scenarios. They then elaborate actions in response to the scenarios identified. With the application of PPA, the research team aims to answer the following questions: What are the key factors influencing forest tenure security? What possible actions can mitigate negative implications (or reduce barriers impeding implementation) and promote positive changes (e.g. equitable access for women and marginalized groups? Who should be responsible for those actions? PPA aims to help decision makers understand the key drivers, challenges and future consequences of policy options. book info:eu-repo/semantics/book Book info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587247/1/BBourgeois1701.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006749 10.17528/cifor/006749 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17528/cifor/006749 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006749 |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
K10 - Production forestière E50 - Sociologie rurale D50 - Législation forêt forêt tropicale gestion des ressources naturelles communauté rurale femme forêt collective droit d'accès réglementation forestière approche participative protection de la forêt gouvernance http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6604 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28079 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8038 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725 K10 - Production forestière E50 - Sociologie rurale D50 - Législation forêt forêt tropicale gestion des ressources naturelles communauté rurale femme forêt collective droit d'accès réglementation forestière approche participative protection de la forêt gouvernance http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6604 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28079 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8038 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725 |
spellingShingle |
K10 - Production forestière E50 - Sociologie rurale D50 - Législation forêt forêt tropicale gestion des ressources naturelles communauté rurale femme forêt collective droit d'accès réglementation forestière approche participative protection de la forêt gouvernance http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6604 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28079 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8038 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725 K10 - Production forestière E50 - Sociologie rurale D50 - Législation forêt forêt tropicale gestion des ressources naturelles communauté rurale femme forêt collective droit d'accès réglementation forestière approche participative protection de la forêt gouvernance http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6604 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28079 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8038 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725 Bourgeois, Robin Liswanti, Nining Mukasa, Concepta Zamora, Alejandra Herawati, Tuti Monterroso, Iliana Mshale, Baruani Banjade, Mani Ram Mwangi, Esther Larson, Anne Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure |
description |
The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) initiated the GCS-Tenure project in Indonesia, Uganda and Peru conducted the study to analyze the relationships between statutory and customary land tenure and how these relationships affect tenure security of forest dependent communities, including women and other marginalized groups. Using a global comparative approach and standardized methodologies, the study analyzes the differential success or failure of policy and institutional innovations to enhance secure tenure rights. It also examines how these innovations identify strategies likely to lead to desired outcomes. The Participatory Prospective Analysis (PPA) is used as a first step by engaging key stakeholders. Through participatory meetings, all expert stakeholders progressively identify and develop a range of tenure security scenarios. They then elaborate actions in response to the scenarios identified. With the application of PPA, the research team aims to answer the following questions: What are the key factors influencing forest tenure security? What possible actions can mitigate negative implications (or reduce barriers impeding implementation) and promote positive changes (e.g. equitable access for women and marginalized groups? Who should be responsible for those actions? PPA aims to help decision makers understand the key drivers, challenges and future consequences of policy options. |
format |
book |
topic_facet |
K10 - Production forestière E50 - Sociologie rurale D50 - Législation forêt forêt tropicale gestion des ressources naturelles communauté rurale femme forêt collective droit d'accès réglementation forestière approche participative protection de la forêt gouvernance http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6604 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28079 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8038 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725 |
author |
Bourgeois, Robin Liswanti, Nining Mukasa, Concepta Zamora, Alejandra Herawati, Tuti Monterroso, Iliana Mshale, Baruani Banjade, Mani Ram Mwangi, Esther Larson, Anne |
author_facet |
Bourgeois, Robin Liswanti, Nining Mukasa, Concepta Zamora, Alejandra Herawati, Tuti Monterroso, Iliana Mshale, Baruani Banjade, Mani Ram Mwangi, Esther Larson, Anne |
author_sort |
Bourgeois, Robin |
title |
Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure |
title_short |
Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure |
title_full |
Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure |
title_fullStr |
Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: Building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure |
title_sort |
guide for co-elaboration of scenarios: building shared understanding and joint action for reform and security of forest tenure |
publisher |
CIFOR |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587247/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587247/1/BBourgeois1701.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bourgeoisrobin guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT liswantinining guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT mukasaconcepta guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT zamoraalejandra guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT herawatituti guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT monterrosoiliana guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT mshalebaruani guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT banjademaniram guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT mwangiesther guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure AT larsonanne guideforcoelaborationofscenariosbuildingsharedunderstandingandjointactionforreformandsecurityofforesttenure |
_version_ |
1792499447728439296 |