Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption
In a global framework of growing concern for food security and environmental protection, the selection of food products with higher protein content and lower environmental impact is a challenge. To assess the reliability of different strategies along the food supply chain, a measure of food cost through the environmental impact-protein content binomial is necessary. This study proposes a standardized method to calculate the Green Protein Footprint (GPF) index, a method that assesses both the environmental impact of a food product and its protein content provided to consumers. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to calculate the environmental impact of the selected food products, and a Life Cycle Protein Assessment (LCPA) was performed by accounting for the protein content along the supply chain. Although the GPF can be applied to all food chain products, this paper is focused on European anchovy-based products for indirect human consumption (fishmeal) and for direct human consumption (fresh, salted and canned anchovies). Moreover, the circular economy concept was applied considering the valorization of the anchovy residues generated during the canning process. These residues were used to produce fishmeal, which was employed in bass aquaculture. Hence, humans are finally consuming fish protein from the residues, closing the loop of the original product life cycle. More elaborated, multi-ingredient food products (salted and canned anchovy products), presented higher GPF values due to higher environmental impacts. Furthermore, the increase of food loss throughout their life cycle caused a decrease in the protein content. Regarding salted and canned products, the packaging was the main hotspot. The influence of the packaging was evaluated using the GPF, reaffirming that plastic was the best alternative. These results highlighted the importance of improving packaging materials in food products.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-586205 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
U30 - Méthodes de recherche P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières Q01 - Sciences et technologies alimentaires - Considérations générales impact sur l'environnement sécurité alimentaire production alimentaire chaîne d'approvisionnement alimentaire anchois teneur en protéines consommation alimentaire empreinte écologique évaluation de l'impact protection de l'environnement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10967 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3025 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2630c679 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_396 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6251 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3016 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_423ff1cb http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37938 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898 U30 - Méthodes de recherche P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières Q01 - Sciences et technologies alimentaires - Considérations générales impact sur l'environnement sécurité alimentaire production alimentaire chaîne d'approvisionnement alimentaire anchois teneur en protéines consommation alimentaire empreinte écologique évaluation de l'impact protection de l'environnement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10967 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3025 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2630c679 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_396 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6251 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3016 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_423ff1cb http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37938 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898 |
spellingShingle |
U30 - Méthodes de recherche P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières Q01 - Sciences et technologies alimentaires - Considérations générales impact sur l'environnement sécurité alimentaire production alimentaire chaîne d'approvisionnement alimentaire anchois teneur en protéines consommation alimentaire empreinte écologique évaluation de l'impact protection de l'environnement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10967 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3025 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2630c679 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_396 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6251 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3016 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_423ff1cb http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37938 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898 U30 - Méthodes de recherche P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières Q01 - Sciences et technologies alimentaires - Considérations générales impact sur l'environnement sécurité alimentaire production alimentaire chaîne d'approvisionnement alimentaire anchois teneur en protéines consommation alimentaire empreinte écologique évaluation de l'impact protection de l'environnement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10967 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3025 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2630c679 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_396 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6251 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3016 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_423ff1cb http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37938 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898 Laso, Jara Margallo, María Serrano, María Vázquez-Rowe, Ian Avadi Tapia, Angel Daniel Fullana, Pere Bala, Alba Gazulla, Cristina Irabien, Angel Aldaco, Rubén Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption |
description |
In a global framework of growing concern for food security and environmental protection, the selection of food products with higher protein content and lower environmental impact is a challenge. To assess the reliability of different strategies along the food supply chain, a measure of food cost through the environmental impact-protein content binomial is necessary. This study proposes a standardized method to calculate the Green Protein Footprint (GPF) index, a method that assesses both the environmental impact of a food product and its protein content provided to consumers. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to calculate the environmental impact of the selected food products, and a Life Cycle Protein Assessment (LCPA) was performed by accounting for the protein content along the supply chain. Although the GPF can be applied to all food chain products, this paper is focused on European anchovy-based products for indirect human consumption (fishmeal) and for direct human consumption (fresh, salted and canned anchovies). Moreover, the circular economy concept was applied considering the valorization of the anchovy residues generated during the canning process. These residues were used to produce fishmeal, which was employed in bass aquaculture. Hence, humans are finally consuming fish protein from the residues, closing the loop of the original product life cycle. More elaborated, multi-ingredient food products (salted and canned anchovy products), presented higher GPF values due to higher environmental impacts. Furthermore, the increase of food loss throughout their life cycle caused a decrease in the protein content. Regarding salted and canned products, the packaging was the main hotspot. The influence of the packaging was evaluated using the GPF, reaffirming that plastic was the best alternative. These results highlighted the importance of improving packaging materials in food products. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
U30 - Méthodes de recherche P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières Q01 - Sciences et technologies alimentaires - Considérations générales impact sur l'environnement sécurité alimentaire production alimentaire chaîne d'approvisionnement alimentaire anchois teneur en protéines consommation alimentaire empreinte écologique évaluation de l'impact protection de l'environnement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10967 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3025 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2630c679 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_396 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6251 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3016 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_423ff1cb http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37938 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898 |
author |
Laso, Jara Margallo, María Serrano, María Vázquez-Rowe, Ian Avadi Tapia, Angel Daniel Fullana, Pere Bala, Alba Gazulla, Cristina Irabien, Angel Aldaco, Rubén |
author_facet |
Laso, Jara Margallo, María Serrano, María Vázquez-Rowe, Ian Avadi Tapia, Angel Daniel Fullana, Pere Bala, Alba Gazulla, Cristina Irabien, Angel Aldaco, Rubén |
author_sort |
Laso, Jara |
title |
Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption |
title_short |
Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption |
title_full |
Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption |
title_fullStr |
Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption |
title_full_unstemmed |
Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption |
title_sort |
introducing the green protein footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption |
publisher |
Elsevier |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586205/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586205/1/1-s2.0-S0048969717332060-main.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lasojara introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT margallomaria introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT serranomaria introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT vazquezroweian introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT avaditapiaangeldaniel introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT fullanapere introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT balaalba introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT gazullacristina introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT irabienangel introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption AT aldacoruben introducingthegreenproteinfootprintmethodasanunderstandablemeasureoftheenvironmentalcostofanchovyconsumption |
_version_ |
1819043606858563584 |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5862052024-12-18T20:43:13Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586205/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586205/ Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption. Laso Jara, Margallo María, Serrano María, Vázquez-Rowe Ian, Avadi Tapia Angel Daniel, Fullana Pere, Bala Alba, Gazulla Cristina, Irabien Angel, Aldaco Rubén. 2018. Science of the Total Environment, 621 : 40-53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.148 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.148> Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption Laso, Jara Margallo, María Serrano, María Vázquez-Rowe, Ian Avadi Tapia, Angel Daniel Fullana, Pere Bala, Alba Gazulla, Cristina Irabien, Angel Aldaco, Rubén eng 2018 Elsevier Science of the Total Environment U30 - Méthodes de recherche P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières Q01 - Sciences et technologies alimentaires - Considérations générales impact sur l'environnement sécurité alimentaire production alimentaire chaîne d'approvisionnement alimentaire anchois teneur en protéines consommation alimentaire empreinte écologique évaluation de l'impact protection de l'environnement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10967 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3025 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2630c679 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_396 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6251 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3016 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_423ff1cb http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37938 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898 In a global framework of growing concern for food security and environmental protection, the selection of food products with higher protein content and lower environmental impact is a challenge. To assess the reliability of different strategies along the food supply chain, a measure of food cost through the environmental impact-protein content binomial is necessary. This study proposes a standardized method to calculate the Green Protein Footprint (GPF) index, a method that assesses both the environmental impact of a food product and its protein content provided to consumers. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to calculate the environmental impact of the selected food products, and a Life Cycle Protein Assessment (LCPA) was performed by accounting for the protein content along the supply chain. Although the GPF can be applied to all food chain products, this paper is focused on European anchovy-based products for indirect human consumption (fishmeal) and for direct human consumption (fresh, salted and canned anchovies). Moreover, the circular economy concept was applied considering the valorization of the anchovy residues generated during the canning process. These residues were used to produce fishmeal, which was employed in bass aquaculture. Hence, humans are finally consuming fish protein from the residues, closing the loop of the original product life cycle. More elaborated, multi-ingredient food products (salted and canned anchovy products), presented higher GPF values due to higher environmental impacts. Furthermore, the increase of food loss throughout their life cycle caused a decrease in the protein content. Regarding salted and canned products, the packaging was the main hotspot. The influence of the packaging was evaluated using the GPF, reaffirming that plastic was the best alternative. These results highlighted the importance of improving packaging materials in food products. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586205/1/1-s2.0-S0048969717332060-main.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.148 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.148 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.148 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.148 |