What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression?

Grapevine is a species that get along with water deficit. Yet, it cannot always stand thirst when accompanied by high temperatures, reducing noticeably its gas-exchange rates. Elucidating the origins of this reduction is a challenge, regarded the complex hydraulic, biochemical and energy processes lying behind gas-exchanges. In this work we analyze data collected from an experiment conducted at he whole plant scale on Syrah vines with the aid of the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot. During our experiment, we submitted grapevines to a severe water stress and observed a steep drop in whole plant photosynthetic rates at midday, that was not due to stomatal closure, suggesting that both processes were decoupled at this moment. Using HydroShoot, we explore whether this decoupling results from a direct water limitation on biochemical processes. HydroShoot links xylem hydraulic transport to gas and energy exchanges processes at the organ level. It simulates the effect of water deficit on xylem and stomatal conductances. The biochemical reactions of photosynthesis are affected by water deficit both indirectly through diffusional limitation and directly, through a reduced electron transport rate. Temperature affects photosynthetic rates through Arrhenius functions. Using HydroShoot, we show that photosynthetic, midday depression could not be explained by simple hydraulic limitations. Bulk leaf water potential dropped to -1.6 MPa but this drop only affected J max when temperatures exceeded 34 °C. Neither the Arrhenius response, nor the water limitation considered independently were sufficient to predict the observed drops. Only when responses to water and temperature were combined were we able to reproduce these observations, suggesting that photoinhibition may have occurred under these conditions. Apart from an evidence of photoinhibition, our simulations indicate that xylem cavitation could not explain the observed drop in bulk leaf water potential. By contrast, a decrease in soil water potential has dramatic effects, much stronger than changes in xylem conductivity. The hydraulic architecture did not seem to play a major role in triggering stomatal closure. We conclude that an adequate prediction of grapevines water use efficiency under water deficit conditions relies strongly on soil hydraulic properties and photoinhibition predictions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Albasha, Rami, Simonneau, Thierry, Pradal, Christophe, Fournier, Christian, Lebon, Eric
Format: conference_item biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: COVIAR
Subjects:H50 - Troubles divers des plantes, F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement, F61 - Physiologie végétale - Nutrition, U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586073/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586073/1/Albasha_et_al_Full_Manuscript-1.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-586073
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic H50 - Troubles divers des plantes
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
F61 - Physiologie végétale - Nutrition
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
H50 - Troubles divers des plantes
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
F61 - Physiologie végétale - Nutrition
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
spellingShingle H50 - Troubles divers des plantes
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
F61 - Physiologie végétale - Nutrition
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
H50 - Troubles divers des plantes
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
F61 - Physiologie végétale - Nutrition
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
Albasha, Rami
Simonneau, Thierry
Pradal, Christophe
Fournier, Christian
Lebon, Eric
What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression?
description Grapevine is a species that get along with water deficit. Yet, it cannot always stand thirst when accompanied by high temperatures, reducing noticeably its gas-exchange rates. Elucidating the origins of this reduction is a challenge, regarded the complex hydraulic, biochemical and energy processes lying behind gas-exchanges. In this work we analyze data collected from an experiment conducted at he whole plant scale on Syrah vines with the aid of the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot. During our experiment, we submitted grapevines to a severe water stress and observed a steep drop in whole plant photosynthetic rates at midday, that was not due to stomatal closure, suggesting that both processes were decoupled at this moment. Using HydroShoot, we explore whether this decoupling results from a direct water limitation on biochemical processes. HydroShoot links xylem hydraulic transport to gas and energy exchanges processes at the organ level. It simulates the effect of water deficit on xylem and stomatal conductances. The biochemical reactions of photosynthesis are affected by water deficit both indirectly through diffusional limitation and directly, through a reduced electron transport rate. Temperature affects photosynthetic rates through Arrhenius functions. Using HydroShoot, we show that photosynthetic, midday depression could not be explained by simple hydraulic limitations. Bulk leaf water potential dropped to -1.6 MPa but this drop only affected J max when temperatures exceeded 34 °C. Neither the Arrhenius response, nor the water limitation considered independently were sufficient to predict the observed drops. Only when responses to water and temperature were combined were we able to reproduce these observations, suggesting that photoinhibition may have occurred under these conditions. Apart from an evidence of photoinhibition, our simulations indicate that xylem cavitation could not explain the observed drop in bulk leaf water potential. By contrast, a decrease in soil water potential has dramatic effects, much stronger than changes in xylem conductivity. The hydraulic architecture did not seem to play a major role in triggering stomatal closure. We conclude that an adequate prediction of grapevines water use efficiency under water deficit conditions relies strongly on soil hydraulic properties and photoinhibition predictions.
format conference_item
topic_facet H50 - Troubles divers des plantes
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
F61 - Physiologie végétale - Nutrition
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
author Albasha, Rami
Simonneau, Thierry
Pradal, Christophe
Fournier, Christian
Lebon, Eric
author_facet Albasha, Rami
Simonneau, Thierry
Pradal, Christophe
Fournier, Christian
Lebon, Eric
author_sort Albasha, Rami
title What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression?
title_short What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression?
title_full What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression?
title_fullStr What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression?
title_full_unstemmed What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression?
title_sort what does the functional-structural plant model hydroshoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​vitis vinifera​ l.)photosynthesis depression?
publisher COVIAR
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586073/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586073/1/Albasha_et_al_Full_Manuscript-1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT albasharami whatdoesthefunctionalstructuralplantmodelhydroshoottellusaboutthereasonsforphotosynthesisdepressioningrapevinevitisviniferalphotosynthesisdepression
AT simonneauthierry whatdoesthefunctionalstructuralplantmodelhydroshoottellusaboutthereasonsforphotosynthesisdepressioningrapevinevitisviniferalphotosynthesisdepression
AT pradalchristophe whatdoesthefunctionalstructuralplantmodelhydroshoottellusaboutthereasonsforphotosynthesisdepressioningrapevinevitisviniferalphotosynthesisdepression
AT fournierchristian whatdoesthefunctionalstructuralplantmodelhydroshoottellusaboutthereasonsforphotosynthesisdepressioningrapevinevitisviniferalphotosynthesisdepression
AT leboneric whatdoesthefunctionalstructuralplantmodelhydroshoottellusaboutthereasonsforphotosynthesisdepressioningrapevinevitisviniferalphotosynthesisdepression
_version_ 1758025543767293952
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5860732018-11-15T11:51:27Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586073/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586073/ What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression? Albasha Rami, Simonneau Thierry, Pradal Christophe, Fournier Christian, Lebon Eric. 2017. . Mendoza : COVIAR, 10 p. GiESCO International Meeting. 20, Mendoza, Argentine, 5 Novembre 2017/10 Novembre 2017.https://www.giesco.org/article-what-does-the-functional-structural-plant-modelhydroshoot-tell-us-about-the-reasons-for-grapevinevitis-vinifera-l.-photosynthesis-depression-que-nous-apprend-le-modele-structure-fonction-hydrosho-757.html <https://www.giesco.org/article-what-does-the-functional-structural-plant-modelhydroshoot-tell-us-about-the-reasons-for-grapevinevitis-vinifera-l.-photosynthesis-depression-que-nous-apprend-le-modele-structure-fonction-hydrosho-757.html> Researchers What does the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot tell us about the reasons for photosynthesis depression in grapevine (​Vitis vinifera​ L.)photosynthesis depression? Albasha, Rami Simonneau, Thierry Pradal, Christophe Fournier, Christian Lebon, Eric eng 2017 COVIAR H50 - Troubles divers des plantes F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement F61 - Physiologie végétale - Nutrition U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques Grapevine is a species that get along with water deficit. Yet, it cannot always stand thirst when accompanied by high temperatures, reducing noticeably its gas-exchange rates. Elucidating the origins of this reduction is a challenge, regarded the complex hydraulic, biochemical and energy processes lying behind gas-exchanges. In this work we analyze data collected from an experiment conducted at he whole plant scale on Syrah vines with the aid of the functional-structural plant model HydroShoot. During our experiment, we submitted grapevines to a severe water stress and observed a steep drop in whole plant photosynthetic rates at midday, that was not due to stomatal closure, suggesting that both processes were decoupled at this moment. Using HydroShoot, we explore whether this decoupling results from a direct water limitation on biochemical processes. HydroShoot links xylem hydraulic transport to gas and energy exchanges processes at the organ level. It simulates the effect of water deficit on xylem and stomatal conductances. The biochemical reactions of photosynthesis are affected by water deficit both indirectly through diffusional limitation and directly, through a reduced electron transport rate. Temperature affects photosynthetic rates through Arrhenius functions. Using HydroShoot, we show that photosynthetic, midday depression could not be explained by simple hydraulic limitations. Bulk leaf water potential dropped to -1.6 MPa but this drop only affected J max when temperatures exceeded 34 °C. Neither the Arrhenius response, nor the water limitation considered independently were sufficient to predict the observed drops. Only when responses to water and temperature were combined were we able to reproduce these observations, suggesting that photoinhibition may have occurred under these conditions. Apart from an evidence of photoinhibition, our simulations indicate that xylem cavitation could not explain the observed drop in bulk leaf water potential. By contrast, a decrease in soil water potential has dramatic effects, much stronger than changes in xylem conductivity. The hydraulic architecture did not seem to play a major role in triggering stomatal closure. We conclude that an adequate prediction of grapevines water use efficiency under water deficit conditions relies strongly on soil hydraulic properties and photoinhibition predictions. conference_item info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586073/1/Albasha_et_al_Full_Manuscript-1.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://www.giesco.org/article-what-does-the-functional-structural-plant-modelhydroshoot-tell-us-about-the-reasons-for-grapevinevitis-vinifera-l.-photosynthesis-depression-que-nous-apprend-le-modele-structure-fonction-hydrosho-757.html info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://www.giesco.org/article-what-does-the-functional-structural-plant-modelhydroshoot-tell-us-about-the-reasons-for-grapevinevitis-vinifera-l.-photosynthesis-depression-que-nous-apprend-le-modele-structure-fonction-hydrosho-757.html info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/purl/http://giescomendoza2017.inv.gov.ar