Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience

Human benefits from ecosystems result from complex interactions between ecological and social processes. People affect ecosystems' capacity to deliver services that contribute to the well-being of humans and their resilience. The delivery of ecosystem services (ES) has often been considered as a linear and direct flow from nature to people without feedbacks or human inputs. We adjusted the widely used ES cascade to highlight how humans mediate each step in the ES delivery. We then applied the proposed framework to empirical field studies in Indonesia. We focused on the role of forested landscapes to increase rural people's resilience to climate hazards such as drought and floods. We found that human actions determine benefits from ES through several mechanisms (ES management, mobilization, allocation-appropriation, and appreciation). These mechanisms are influenced by peoples' decisions along the ES cascade, which depend on specific factors related to rules, assets, values, and spatial context. By facilitating or hindering ES flows, some stakeholders can determine who benefits from ES and influence the well-being of others. A better understanding of the mediating mechanisms, factors, and feedbacks in ES delivery can support the design of sound environmental assessments and sustainable land management practices.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fedele, Giacomo, Locatelli, Bruno, Djoudi, Houria
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, E14 - Économie et politique du développement, E11 - Économie et politique foncières, E50 - Sociologie rurale, forêt, politique de l'environnement, services écosystémiques, population rurale, communauté rurale, utilisation des terres, petite exploitation agricole, moyens d'existence durables, bien-être social, protection de la forêt, politique de développement, gouvernance, approche participative, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6705, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000157, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/585605/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/585605/1/Fedele_2017_Mechanisms_mediating_contribution_ecosystem_services.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-585605
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5856052024-01-29T00:33:14Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/585605/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/585605/ Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Fedele Giacomo, Locatelli Bruno, Djoudi Houria. 2017. Ecosystem Services, 28 (Part A) : 43-54.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011> Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience Fedele, Giacomo Locatelli, Bruno Djoudi, Houria eng 2017 Ecosystem Services K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E14 - Économie et politique du développement E11 - Économie et politique foncières E50 - Sociologie rurale forêt politique de l'environnement services écosystémiques population rurale communauté rurale utilisation des terres petite exploitation agricole moyens d'existence durables bien-être social protection de la forêt politique de développement gouvernance approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6705 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000157 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 Indonésie http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840 Human benefits from ecosystems result from complex interactions between ecological and social processes. People affect ecosystems' capacity to deliver services that contribute to the well-being of humans and their resilience. The delivery of ecosystem services (ES) has often been considered as a linear and direct flow from nature to people without feedbacks or human inputs. We adjusted the widely used ES cascade to highlight how humans mediate each step in the ES delivery. We then applied the proposed framework to empirical field studies in Indonesia. We focused on the role of forested landscapes to increase rural people's resilience to climate hazards such as drought and floods. We found that human actions determine benefits from ES through several mechanisms (ES management, mobilization, allocation-appropriation, and appreciation). These mechanisms are influenced by peoples' decisions along the ES cascade, which depend on specific factors related to rules, assets, values, and spatial context. By facilitating or hindering ES flows, some stakeholders can determine who benefits from ES and influence the well-being of others. A better understanding of the mediating mechanisms, factors, and feedbacks in ES delivery can support the design of sound environmental assessments and sustainable land management practices. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/585605/1/Fedele_2017_Mechanisms_mediating_contribution_ecosystem_services.pdf text cc_by_nc_nd info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
forêt
politique de l'environnement
services écosystémiques
population rurale
communauté rurale
utilisation des terres
petite exploitation agricole
moyens d'existence durables
bien-être social
protection de la forêt
politique de développement
gouvernance
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6705
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000157
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
forêt
politique de l'environnement
services écosystémiques
population rurale
communauté rurale
utilisation des terres
petite exploitation agricole
moyens d'existence durables
bien-être social
protection de la forêt
politique de développement
gouvernance
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6705
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000157
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840
spellingShingle K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
forêt
politique de l'environnement
services écosystémiques
population rurale
communauté rurale
utilisation des terres
petite exploitation agricole
moyens d'existence durables
bien-être social
protection de la forêt
politique de développement
gouvernance
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6705
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000157
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
forêt
politique de l'environnement
services écosystémiques
population rurale
communauté rurale
utilisation des terres
petite exploitation agricole
moyens d'existence durables
bien-être social
protection de la forêt
politique de développement
gouvernance
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6705
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000157
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840
Fedele, Giacomo
Locatelli, Bruno
Djoudi, Houria
Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience
description Human benefits from ecosystems result from complex interactions between ecological and social processes. People affect ecosystems' capacity to deliver services that contribute to the well-being of humans and their resilience. The delivery of ecosystem services (ES) has often been considered as a linear and direct flow from nature to people without feedbacks or human inputs. We adjusted the widely used ES cascade to highlight how humans mediate each step in the ES delivery. We then applied the proposed framework to empirical field studies in Indonesia. We focused on the role of forested landscapes to increase rural people's resilience to climate hazards such as drought and floods. We found that human actions determine benefits from ES through several mechanisms (ES management, mobilization, allocation-appropriation, and appreciation). These mechanisms are influenced by peoples' decisions along the ES cascade, which depend on specific factors related to rules, assets, values, and spatial context. By facilitating or hindering ES flows, some stakeholders can determine who benefits from ES and influence the well-being of others. A better understanding of the mediating mechanisms, factors, and feedbacks in ES delivery can support the design of sound environmental assessments and sustainable land management practices.
format article
topic_facet K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
forêt
politique de l'environnement
services écosystémiques
population rurale
communauté rurale
utilisation des terres
petite exploitation agricole
moyens d'existence durables
bien-être social
protection de la forêt
politique de développement
gouvernance
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6705
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000157
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7137
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3840
author Fedele, Giacomo
Locatelli, Bruno
Djoudi, Houria
author_facet Fedele, Giacomo
Locatelli, Bruno
Djoudi, Houria
author_sort Fedele, Giacomo
title Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience
title_short Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience
title_full Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience
title_fullStr Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience
title_sort mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/585605/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/585605/1/Fedele_2017_Mechanisms_mediating_contribution_ecosystem_services.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fedelegiacomo mechanismsmediatingthecontributionofecosystemservicestohumanwellbeingandresilience
AT locatellibruno mechanismsmediatingthecontributionofecosystemservicestohumanwellbeingandresilience
AT djoudihouria mechanismsmediatingthecontributionofecosystemservicestohumanwellbeingandresilience
_version_ 1792499353061949440