Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
Despite its theoretical prominence and sound principles, integrated pest management (IPM) continues to suffer from anemic adoption rates in developing countries. To shed light on the reasons, we surveyed the opinions of a large and diverse pool of IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries by using structured concept mapping. The first phase of this method elicited 413 open-ended responses on perceived obstacles to IPM. Analysis of responses revealed 51 unique statements on obstacles, the most frequent of which was “insufficient training and technical support to farmers.” Cluster analyses, based on participant opinions, grouped these unique statements into six themes: research weaknesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and weak adoption incentives. Subsequently, 163 participants rated the obstacles expressed in the 51 unique statements according to importance and remediation difficulty. Respondents from developing countries and high-income countries rated the obstacles differently. As a group, developing-country respondents rated “IPM requires collective action within a farming community” as their top obstacle to IPM adoption. Respondents from high-income countries prioritized instead the “shortage of well-qualified IPM experts and extensionists.” Differential prioritization was also evident among developing-country regions, and when obstacle statements were grouped into themes. Results highlighted the need to improve the participation of stakeholders from developing countries in the IPM adoption debate, and also to situate the debate within specific regional contexts.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | article biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | H10 - Ravageurs des plantes, F07 - Façons culturales, agroécologie, agriculture durable, ravageur des plantes, lutte antiravageur, lutte intégrée, méthode de lutte, approche participative, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485, |
Online Access: | http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/1/Obstacles%20to%20integrated%20pest%20management%20adoption%20in%20developing%20countries.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cirad-fr-584608 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5846082024-01-29T00:21:58Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/ Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries. Parsa Soroush, Morse Stephen, Bonifacio Alejandro, Chancellor Tim C.B., Condori Bruno, Crespo-Pérez Verónica, Hobbs Shaun L.A., Kroschel Jürgen, Ba Makick, Rebaudo François, Sherwood Stephen G., Vanek Steven J., Faye Emile, Herrera Mario, Dangles Olivier. 2014. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (10) : 3889-3894.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111 <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111> Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries Parsa, Soroush Morse, Stephen Bonifacio, Alejandro Chancellor, Tim C.B. Condori, Bruno Crespo-Pérez, Verónica Hobbs, Shaun L.A. Kroschel, Jürgen Ba, Makick Rebaudo, François Sherwood, Stephen G. Vanek, Steven J. Faye, Emile Herrera, Mario Dangles, Olivier eng 2014 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America H10 - Ravageurs des plantes F07 - Façons culturales agroécologie agriculture durable ravageur des plantes lutte antiravageur lutte intégrée méthode de lutte approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 Équateur http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485 Despite its theoretical prominence and sound principles, integrated pest management (IPM) continues to suffer from anemic adoption rates in developing countries. To shed light on the reasons, we surveyed the opinions of a large and diverse pool of IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries by using structured concept mapping. The first phase of this method elicited 413 open-ended responses on perceived obstacles to IPM. Analysis of responses revealed 51 unique statements on obstacles, the most frequent of which was “insufficient training and technical support to farmers.” Cluster analyses, based on participant opinions, grouped these unique statements into six themes: research weaknesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and weak adoption incentives. Subsequently, 163 participants rated the obstacles expressed in the 51 unique statements according to importance and remediation difficulty. Respondents from developing countries and high-income countries rated the obstacles differently. As a group, developing-country respondents rated “IPM requires collective action within a farming community” as their top obstacle to IPM adoption. Respondents from high-income countries prioritized instead the “shortage of well-qualified IPM experts and extensionists.” Differential prioritization was also evident among developing-country regions, and when obstacle statements were grouped into themes. Results highlighted the need to improve the participation of stakeholders from developing countries in the IPM adoption debate, and also to situate the debate within specific regional contexts. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/1/Obstacles%20to%20integrated%20pest%20management%20adoption%20in%20developing%20countries.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111 10.1073/pnas.1312693111 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1073/pnas.1312693111 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111 |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes F07 - Façons culturales agroécologie agriculture durable ravageur des plantes lutte antiravageur lutte intégrée méthode de lutte approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485 H10 - Ravageurs des plantes F07 - Façons culturales agroécologie agriculture durable ravageur des plantes lutte antiravageur lutte intégrée méthode de lutte approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485 |
spellingShingle |
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes F07 - Façons culturales agroécologie agriculture durable ravageur des plantes lutte antiravageur lutte intégrée méthode de lutte approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485 H10 - Ravageurs des plantes F07 - Façons culturales agroécologie agriculture durable ravageur des plantes lutte antiravageur lutte intégrée méthode de lutte approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485 Parsa, Soroush Morse, Stephen Bonifacio, Alejandro Chancellor, Tim C.B. Condori, Bruno Crespo-Pérez, Verónica Hobbs, Shaun L.A. Kroschel, Jürgen Ba, Makick Rebaudo, François Sherwood, Stephen G. Vanek, Steven J. Faye, Emile Herrera, Mario Dangles, Olivier Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries |
description |
Despite its theoretical prominence and sound principles, integrated pest management (IPM) continues to suffer from anemic adoption rates in developing countries. To shed light on the reasons, we surveyed the opinions of a large and diverse pool of IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries by using structured concept mapping. The first phase of this method elicited 413 open-ended responses on perceived obstacles to IPM. Analysis of responses revealed 51 unique statements on obstacles, the most frequent of which was “insufficient training and technical support to farmers.” Cluster analyses, based on participant opinions, grouped these unique statements into six themes: research weaknesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and weak adoption incentives. Subsequently, 163 participants rated the obstacles expressed in the 51 unique statements according to importance and remediation difficulty. Respondents from developing countries and high-income countries rated the obstacles differently. As a group, developing-country respondents rated “IPM requires collective action within a farming community” as their top obstacle to IPM adoption. Respondents from high-income countries prioritized instead the “shortage of well-qualified IPM experts and extensionists.” Differential prioritization was also evident among developing-country regions, and when obstacle statements were grouped into themes. Results highlighted the need to improve the participation of stakeholders from developing countries in the IPM adoption debate, and also to situate the debate within specific regional contexts. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes F07 - Façons culturales agroécologie agriculture durable ravageur des plantes lutte antiravageur lutte intégrée méthode de lutte approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485 |
author |
Parsa, Soroush Morse, Stephen Bonifacio, Alejandro Chancellor, Tim C.B. Condori, Bruno Crespo-Pérez, Verónica Hobbs, Shaun L.A. Kroschel, Jürgen Ba, Makick Rebaudo, François Sherwood, Stephen G. Vanek, Steven J. Faye, Emile Herrera, Mario Dangles, Olivier |
author_facet |
Parsa, Soroush Morse, Stephen Bonifacio, Alejandro Chancellor, Tim C.B. Condori, Bruno Crespo-Pérez, Verónica Hobbs, Shaun L.A. Kroschel, Jürgen Ba, Makick Rebaudo, François Sherwood, Stephen G. Vanek, Steven J. Faye, Emile Herrera, Mario Dangles, Olivier |
author_sort |
Parsa, Soroush |
title |
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries |
title_short |
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries |
title_full |
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries |
title_fullStr |
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries |
title_sort |
obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/1/Obstacles%20to%20integrated%20pest%20management%20adoption%20in%20developing%20countries.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT parsasoroush obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT morsestephen obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT bonifacioalejandro obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT chancellortimcb obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT condoribruno obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT crespoperezveronica obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT hobbsshaunla obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT kroscheljurgen obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT bamakick obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT rebaudofrancois obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT sherwoodstepheng obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT vanekstevenj obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT fayeemile obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT herreramario obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries AT danglesolivier obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries |
_version_ |
1792499298758295552 |