Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries

Despite its theoretical prominence and sound principles, integrated pest management (IPM) continues to suffer from anemic adoption rates in developing countries. To shed light on the reasons, we surveyed the opinions of a large and diverse pool of IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries by using structured concept mapping. The first phase of this method elicited 413 open-ended responses on perceived obstacles to IPM. Analysis of responses revealed 51 unique statements on obstacles, the most frequent of which was “insufficient training and technical support to farmers.” Cluster analyses, based on participant opinions, grouped these unique statements into six themes: research weaknesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and weak adoption incentives. Subsequently, 163 participants rated the obstacles expressed in the 51 unique statements according to importance and remediation difficulty. Respondents from developing countries and high-income countries rated the obstacles differently. As a group, developing-country respondents rated “IPM requires collective action within a farming community” as their top obstacle to IPM adoption. Respondents from high-income countries prioritized instead the “shortage of well-qualified IPM experts and extensionists.” Differential prioritization was also evident among developing-country regions, and when obstacle statements were grouped into themes. Results highlighted the need to improve the participation of stakeholders from developing countries in the IPM adoption debate, and also to situate the debate within specific regional contexts.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parsa, Soroush, Morse, Stephen, Bonifacio, Alejandro, Chancellor, Tim C.B., Condori, Bruno, Crespo-Pérez, Verónica, Hobbs, Shaun L.A., Kroschel, Jürgen, Ba, Makick, Rebaudo, François, Sherwood, Stephen G., Vanek, Steven J., Faye, Emile, Herrera, Mario, Dangles, Olivier
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:H10 - Ravageurs des plantes, F07 - Façons culturales, agroécologie, agriculture durable, ravageur des plantes, lutte antiravageur, lutte intégrée, méthode de lutte, approche participative, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/1/Obstacles%20to%20integrated%20pest%20management%20adoption%20in%20developing%20countries.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-584608
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5846082024-01-29T00:21:58Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/ Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries. Parsa Soroush, Morse Stephen, Bonifacio Alejandro, Chancellor Tim C.B., Condori Bruno, Crespo-Pérez Verónica, Hobbs Shaun L.A., Kroschel Jürgen, Ba Makick, Rebaudo François, Sherwood Stephen G., Vanek Steven J., Faye Emile, Herrera Mario, Dangles Olivier. 2014. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (10) : 3889-3894.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111 <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111> Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries Parsa, Soroush Morse, Stephen Bonifacio, Alejandro Chancellor, Tim C.B. Condori, Bruno Crespo-Pérez, Verónica Hobbs, Shaun L.A. Kroschel, Jürgen Ba, Makick Rebaudo, François Sherwood, Stephen G. Vanek, Steven J. Faye, Emile Herrera, Mario Dangles, Olivier eng 2014 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America H10 - Ravageurs des plantes F07 - Façons culturales agroécologie agriculture durable ravageur des plantes lutte antiravageur lutte intégrée méthode de lutte approche participative http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 Équateur http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485 Despite its theoretical prominence and sound principles, integrated pest management (IPM) continues to suffer from anemic adoption rates in developing countries. To shed light on the reasons, we surveyed the opinions of a large and diverse pool of IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries by using structured concept mapping. The first phase of this method elicited 413 open-ended responses on perceived obstacles to IPM. Analysis of responses revealed 51 unique statements on obstacles, the most frequent of which was “insufficient training and technical support to farmers.” Cluster analyses, based on participant opinions, grouped these unique statements into six themes: research weaknesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and weak adoption incentives. Subsequently, 163 participants rated the obstacles expressed in the 51 unique statements according to importance and remediation difficulty. Respondents from developing countries and high-income countries rated the obstacles differently. As a group, developing-country respondents rated “IPM requires collective action within a farming community” as their top obstacle to IPM adoption. Respondents from high-income countries prioritized instead the “shortage of well-qualified IPM experts and extensionists.” Differential prioritization was also evident among developing-country regions, and when obstacle statements were grouped into themes. Results highlighted the need to improve the participation of stakeholders from developing countries in the IPM adoption debate, and also to situate the debate within specific regional contexts. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/1/Obstacles%20to%20integrated%20pest%20management%20adoption%20in%20developing%20countries.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111 10.1073/pnas.1312693111 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1073/pnas.1312693111 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312693111
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
F07 - Façons culturales
agroécologie
agriculture durable
ravageur des plantes
lutte antiravageur
lutte intégrée
méthode de lutte
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
F07 - Façons culturales
agroécologie
agriculture durable
ravageur des plantes
lutte antiravageur
lutte intégrée
méthode de lutte
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485
spellingShingle H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
F07 - Façons culturales
agroécologie
agriculture durable
ravageur des plantes
lutte antiravageur
lutte intégrée
méthode de lutte
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485
H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
F07 - Façons culturales
agroécologie
agriculture durable
ravageur des plantes
lutte antiravageur
lutte intégrée
méthode de lutte
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485
Parsa, Soroush
Morse, Stephen
Bonifacio, Alejandro
Chancellor, Tim C.B.
Condori, Bruno
Crespo-Pérez, Verónica
Hobbs, Shaun L.A.
Kroschel, Jürgen
Ba, Makick
Rebaudo, François
Sherwood, Stephen G.
Vanek, Steven J.
Faye, Emile
Herrera, Mario
Dangles, Olivier
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
description Despite its theoretical prominence and sound principles, integrated pest management (IPM) continues to suffer from anemic adoption rates in developing countries. To shed light on the reasons, we surveyed the opinions of a large and diverse pool of IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries by using structured concept mapping. The first phase of this method elicited 413 open-ended responses on perceived obstacles to IPM. Analysis of responses revealed 51 unique statements on obstacles, the most frequent of which was “insufficient training and technical support to farmers.” Cluster analyses, based on participant opinions, grouped these unique statements into six themes: research weaknesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and weak adoption incentives. Subsequently, 163 participants rated the obstacles expressed in the 51 unique statements according to importance and remediation difficulty. Respondents from developing countries and high-income countries rated the obstacles differently. As a group, developing-country respondents rated “IPM requires collective action within a farming community” as their top obstacle to IPM adoption. Respondents from high-income countries prioritized instead the “shortage of well-qualified IPM experts and extensionists.” Differential prioritization was also evident among developing-country regions, and when obstacle statements were grouped into themes. Results highlighted the need to improve the participation of stakeholders from developing countries in the IPM adoption debate, and also to situate the debate within specific regional contexts.
format article
topic_facet H10 - Ravageurs des plantes
F07 - Façons culturales
agroécologie
agriculture durable
ravageur des plantes
lutte antiravageur
lutte intégrée
méthode de lutte
approche participative
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16187
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2485
author Parsa, Soroush
Morse, Stephen
Bonifacio, Alejandro
Chancellor, Tim C.B.
Condori, Bruno
Crespo-Pérez, Verónica
Hobbs, Shaun L.A.
Kroschel, Jürgen
Ba, Makick
Rebaudo, François
Sherwood, Stephen G.
Vanek, Steven J.
Faye, Emile
Herrera, Mario
Dangles, Olivier
author_facet Parsa, Soroush
Morse, Stephen
Bonifacio, Alejandro
Chancellor, Tim C.B.
Condori, Bruno
Crespo-Pérez, Verónica
Hobbs, Shaun L.A.
Kroschel, Jürgen
Ba, Makick
Rebaudo, François
Sherwood, Stephen G.
Vanek, Steven J.
Faye, Emile
Herrera, Mario
Dangles, Olivier
author_sort Parsa, Soroush
title Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
title_short Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
title_full Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
title_fullStr Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
title_full_unstemmed Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
title_sort obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584608/1/Obstacles%20to%20integrated%20pest%20management%20adoption%20in%20developing%20countries.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT parsasoroush obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT morsestephen obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT bonifacioalejandro obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT chancellortimcb obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT condoribruno obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT crespoperezveronica obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT hobbsshaunla obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT kroscheljurgen obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT bamakick obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT rebaudofrancois obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT sherwoodstepheng obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT vanekstevenj obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT fayeemile obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT herreramario obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
AT danglesolivier obstaclestointegratedpestmanagementadoptionindevelopingcountries
_version_ 1792499298758295552