Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis
Background African animal trypanosomosis (AAT), transmitted by tsetse flies and tick-borne diseases are the main constraints to livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. Vector control methods such as pour-on offer individual protection against ticks but not against tsetse so far, for which protection has always been communal, through a reduction of their density. The latter requires the treatment of a large part of the herd in a given landscape and is not instantaneous. Methodology/Principal Findings Two prospective surveys were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and persistence of a pour-on formulation composed of cypermetrhin, chlorpyrifos, piperonyl butoxid and citronella (Vectoclor, CEVA Santé Animal). In experimental conditions, tsetse flies were exposed to treated and control cattle. Flies knockdown and engorgement rates were determined and the product persistence was assessed as the time for these parameters to drop below 50% (T50). T50 was 37 days (95%CI: [33–41] days) and 46 days (95%CI: [39–56] days) for the knockdown and engorgement rates respectively. In field conditions, two cattle herds were monitored following a case-control experimental design, in the Adamaoua region of Cameroon. One herd was treated once with Vectoclor pour-on (treated group) and the second used as a control group (not treated). Ticks infestation rate, trypanosomosis prevalence and packed-cell volume were measured over the two months following treatment. The treatment was highly effective against ticks with a complete elimination three days after application in the treated group. Trypanosomosis prevalence was also significantly reduced during the study (by 4, P<0.001) and PCV of the treated group increased significantly in the same time (P<0.001), contrary to the control group. Conclusions/Significance The protection of this new pour-on against tsetse bites and trypanosomosis is demonstrated here for the first time. Moreover, this insecticide and repellent mixture offer a longer persistence of the efficacy against both tsetse and ticks than similar products currently on the market. It offers a great new opportunity for an integrated AAT control strategy including the treatment of residual cases with trypanocides. It might also allow controlling the spread of resistance against these trypanocides.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-582891 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
L72 - Organismes nuisibles des animaux L73 - Maladies des animaux trypanosomose africaine zébu méthode de lutte insecticide répulsif efficacité d'utilisation bétail expérimentation Trypanosoma contrôle de maladies vecteur de maladie Insecta Glossina lutte anti-insecte http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35903 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8507 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3887 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6506 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36789 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4397 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2758 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7987 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2327 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8164 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3890 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11174 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8081 L72 - Organismes nuisibles des animaux L73 - Maladies des animaux trypanosomose africaine zébu méthode de lutte insecticide répulsif efficacité d'utilisation bétail expérimentation Trypanosoma contrôle de maladies vecteur de maladie Insecta Glossina lutte anti-insecte http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35903 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8507 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3887 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6506 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36789 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4397 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2758 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7987 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2327 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8164 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3890 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11174 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8081 |
spellingShingle |
L72 - Organismes nuisibles des animaux L73 - Maladies des animaux trypanosomose africaine zébu méthode de lutte insecticide répulsif efficacité d'utilisation bétail expérimentation Trypanosoma contrôle de maladies vecteur de maladie Insecta Glossina lutte anti-insecte http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35903 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8507 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3887 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6506 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36789 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4397 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2758 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7987 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2327 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8164 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3890 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11174 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8081 L72 - Organismes nuisibles des animaux L73 - Maladies des animaux trypanosomose africaine zébu méthode de lutte insecticide répulsif efficacité d'utilisation bétail expérimentation Trypanosoma contrôle de maladies vecteur de maladie Insecta Glossina lutte anti-insecte http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35903 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8507 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3887 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6506 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36789 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4397 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2758 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7987 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2327 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8164 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3890 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11174 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8081 Gimonneau, Geoffrey Alioum, Yaya Abdoulmoumini, Mamoudou Zoli, André Cene, Bila Adakal, Hassane Bouyer, Jérémy Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis |
description |
Background African animal trypanosomosis (AAT), transmitted by tsetse flies and tick-borne diseases are the main constraints to livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. Vector control methods such as pour-on offer individual protection against ticks but not against tsetse so far, for which protection has always been communal, through a reduction of their density. The latter requires the treatment of a large part of the herd in a given landscape and is not instantaneous. Methodology/Principal Findings Two prospective surveys were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and persistence of a pour-on formulation composed of cypermetrhin, chlorpyrifos, piperonyl butoxid and citronella (Vectoclor, CEVA Santé Animal). In experimental conditions, tsetse flies were exposed to treated and control cattle. Flies knockdown and engorgement rates were determined and the product persistence was assessed as the time for these parameters to drop below 50% (T50). T50 was 37 days (95%CI: [33–41] days) and 46 days (95%CI: [39–56] days) for the knockdown and engorgement rates respectively. In field conditions, two cattle herds were monitored following a case-control experimental design, in the Adamaoua region of Cameroon. One herd was treated once with Vectoclor pour-on (treated group) and the second used as a control group (not treated). Ticks infestation rate, trypanosomosis prevalence and packed-cell volume were measured over the two months following treatment. The treatment was highly effective against ticks with a complete elimination three days after application in the treated group. Trypanosomosis prevalence was also significantly reduced during the study (by 4, P<0.001) and PCV of the treated group increased significantly in the same time (P<0.001), contrary to the control group. Conclusions/Significance The protection of this new pour-on against tsetse bites and trypanosomosis is demonstrated here for the first time. Moreover, this insecticide and repellent mixture offer a longer persistence of the efficacy against both tsetse and ticks than similar products currently on the market. It offers a great new opportunity for an integrated AAT control strategy including the treatment of residual cases with trypanocides. It might also allow controlling the spread of resistance against these trypanocides. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
L72 - Organismes nuisibles des animaux L73 - Maladies des animaux trypanosomose africaine zébu méthode de lutte insecticide répulsif efficacité d'utilisation bétail expérimentation Trypanosoma contrôle de maladies vecteur de maladie Insecta Glossina lutte anti-insecte http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35903 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8507 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3887 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6506 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36789 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4397 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2758 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7987 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2327 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8164 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3890 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11174 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8081 |
author |
Gimonneau, Geoffrey Alioum, Yaya Abdoulmoumini, Mamoudou Zoli, André Cene, Bila Adakal, Hassane Bouyer, Jérémy |
author_facet |
Gimonneau, Geoffrey Alioum, Yaya Abdoulmoumini, Mamoudou Zoli, André Cene, Bila Adakal, Hassane Bouyer, Jérémy |
author_sort |
Gimonneau, Geoffrey |
title |
Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis |
title_short |
Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis |
title_full |
Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis |
title_fullStr |
Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis |
title_sort |
insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis |
publisher |
PLOS |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582891/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582891/1/Gimonneau_2016.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gimonneaugeoffrey insecticideandrepellentmixturepouronprotectscattleagainstanimaltrypanosomosis AT alioumyaya insecticideandrepellentmixturepouronprotectscattleagainstanimaltrypanosomosis AT abdoulmouminimamoudou insecticideandrepellentmixturepouronprotectscattleagainstanimaltrypanosomosis AT zoliandre insecticideandrepellentmixturepouronprotectscattleagainstanimaltrypanosomosis AT cenebila insecticideandrepellentmixturepouronprotectscattleagainstanimaltrypanosomosis AT adakalhassane insecticideandrepellentmixturepouronprotectscattleagainstanimaltrypanosomosis AT bouyerjeremy insecticideandrepellentmixturepouronprotectscattleagainstanimaltrypanosomosis |
_version_ |
1819043448503664640 |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5828912024-12-19T12:33:15Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582891/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582891/ Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis. Gimonneau Geoffrey, Alioum Yaya, Abdoulmoumini Mamoudou, Zoli André, Cene Bila, Adakal Hassane, Bouyer Jérémy. 2016. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10 (12):e0005248, 16 p.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005248 <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005248> Insecticide and repellent mixture pour-on protects cattle against animal trypanosomosis Gimonneau, Geoffrey Alioum, Yaya Abdoulmoumini, Mamoudou Zoli, André Cene, Bila Adakal, Hassane Bouyer, Jérémy eng 2016 PLOS PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases L72 - Organismes nuisibles des animaux L73 - Maladies des animaux trypanosomose africaine zébu méthode de lutte insecticide répulsif efficacité d'utilisation bétail expérimentation Trypanosoma contrôle de maladies vecteur de maladie Insecta Glossina lutte anti-insecte http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35903 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8507 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5728 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3887 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6506 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36789 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4397 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2758 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7987 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2327 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8164 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3890 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11174 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885 Burkina Faso http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8081 Background African animal trypanosomosis (AAT), transmitted by tsetse flies and tick-borne diseases are the main constraints to livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. Vector control methods such as pour-on offer individual protection against ticks but not against tsetse so far, for which protection has always been communal, through a reduction of their density. The latter requires the treatment of a large part of the herd in a given landscape and is not instantaneous. Methodology/Principal Findings Two prospective surveys were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and persistence of a pour-on formulation composed of cypermetrhin, chlorpyrifos, piperonyl butoxid and citronella (Vectoclor, CEVA Santé Animal). In experimental conditions, tsetse flies were exposed to treated and control cattle. Flies knockdown and engorgement rates were determined and the product persistence was assessed as the time for these parameters to drop below 50% (T50). T50 was 37 days (95%CI: [33–41] days) and 46 days (95%CI: [39–56] days) for the knockdown and engorgement rates respectively. In field conditions, two cattle herds were monitored following a case-control experimental design, in the Adamaoua region of Cameroon. One herd was treated once with Vectoclor pour-on (treated group) and the second used as a control group (not treated). Ticks infestation rate, trypanosomosis prevalence and packed-cell volume were measured over the two months following treatment. The treatment was highly effective against ticks with a complete elimination three days after application in the treated group. Trypanosomosis prevalence was also significantly reduced during the study (by 4, P<0.001) and PCV of the treated group increased significantly in the same time (P<0.001), contrary to the control group. Conclusions/Significance The protection of this new pour-on against tsetse bites and trypanosomosis is demonstrated here for the first time. Moreover, this insecticide and repellent mixture offer a longer persistence of the efficacy against both tsetse and ticks than similar products currently on the market. It offers a great new opportunity for an integrated AAT control strategy including the treatment of residual cases with trypanocides. It might also allow controlling the spread of resistance against these trypanocides. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582891/1/Gimonneau_2016.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005248 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005248 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005248 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005248 info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/purl/https://figshare.com/articles/Insecticide_and_Repellent_Mixture_Pour-On_Protects_Cattle_against_Animal_Trypanosomosis/4498034 |