Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?

Increasing the world soils carbon stocks by a factor of 4 per mil annually would compensate the annual net increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. This statement is the core of an initiative launched by the French government at the recent COP21, followed by many countries and international bodies, which attracts political attention to the storage potential of C in soils. Compared to forest and pasture soils, agricultural soils have a higher C storage potential, because they are often characterized by low C contents, and increasing their C content is associated with benefits in terms of soil properties and ecosystem services. Here we quantified, under temperate conditions, the additional C storage related to the implementation of two set of practices that are recognized to be in the framework of agroecology: conservation tillage on the one hand and agroforestry on the other hand. These studies were based on long-term experiments, a 16-years comparison on cropping systems on luvisols in the Paris area and a 18-year-old silvoarable agroforestry trial, on fluvisols in southern France, the main crops being cereals in both cases. C stocks were measured on an equivalent soil mass basis. Both systems allowed for a net storage of C in soils, which are, for the equivalent of the 0-30 cm tilled layer, of 0.55 ± 0.16 t ha-1 yr-1 for conservation agriculture (i.e. no tillage with permanent soil coverage with an associated plant, fescue or alfalfa) and of 0.25 ± 0.03 t ha-1 yr-1 for the agroforestry system. These results are in line with estimates proposed in a recent French national assessment concerning the potential of agricultural practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Compared to recent literature, they further show that practices that increase C inputs to soil through additional biomass production would be more effective to store C in soil (tree rows, cover crops in conservation agriculture) than practices, such as no-tillage, that are assumed to reduce soil organic matter mineralisation rates. This questions our understanding of the stabilization processes of organic matter in soils and especially that of physical protection. The conditions and scale, both spatial and temporal, of physical protection of organic matter are discussed in light of recent literature. (Texte intégral)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chenu, Claire, Cardinael, Rémi, Autret, Bénédicte, Chevallier, Tiphaine, Girardin, Cyril, Mary, Bruno
Format: conference_item biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: INRA
Subjects:F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture, P33 - Chimie et physique du sol, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, K10 - Production forestière, F01 - Culture des plantes,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581514/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581514/1/Chenu%20et%20al%20EcoSummit.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-581514
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5815142021-01-11T17:01:29Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581514/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581514/ Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs? Chenu Claire, Cardinael Rémi, Autret Bénédicte, Chevallier Tiphaine, Girardin Cyril, Mary Bruno. 2016. In : EcoSummit 2016 - Ecological Sustainability: Engineering Change. Montpellier : INRA-IRD, Résumé, 1 p. International EcoSummit Congress 2016. 5, Montpellier, France, 29 Août 2016/1 Septembre 2016. Researchers Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs? Chenu, Claire Cardinael, Rémi Autret, Bénédicte Chevallier, Tiphaine Girardin, Cyril Mary, Bruno eng 2016 INRA EcoSummit 2016 - Ecological Sustainability: Engineering Change F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture P33 - Chimie et physique du sol P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières K10 - Production forestière F01 - Culture des plantes Increasing the world soils carbon stocks by a factor of 4 per mil annually would compensate the annual net increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. This statement is the core of an initiative launched by the French government at the recent COP21, followed by many countries and international bodies, which attracts political attention to the storage potential of C in soils. Compared to forest and pasture soils, agricultural soils have a higher C storage potential, because they are often characterized by low C contents, and increasing their C content is associated with benefits in terms of soil properties and ecosystem services. Here we quantified, under temperate conditions, the additional C storage related to the implementation of two set of practices that are recognized to be in the framework of agroecology: conservation tillage on the one hand and agroforestry on the other hand. These studies were based on long-term experiments, a 16-years comparison on cropping systems on luvisols in the Paris area and a 18-year-old silvoarable agroforestry trial, on fluvisols in southern France, the main crops being cereals in both cases. C stocks were measured on an equivalent soil mass basis. Both systems allowed for a net storage of C in soils, which are, for the equivalent of the 0-30 cm tilled layer, of 0.55 ± 0.16 t ha-1 yr-1 for conservation agriculture (i.e. no tillage with permanent soil coverage with an associated plant, fescue or alfalfa) and of 0.25 ± 0.03 t ha-1 yr-1 for the agroforestry system. These results are in line with estimates proposed in a recent French national assessment concerning the potential of agricultural practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Compared to recent literature, they further show that practices that increase C inputs to soil through additional biomass production would be more effective to store C in soil (tree rows, cover crops in conservation agriculture) than practices, such as no-tillage, that are assumed to reduce soil organic matter mineralisation rates. This questions our understanding of the stabilization processes of organic matter in soils and especially that of physical protection. The conditions and scale, both spatial and temporal, of physical protection of organic matter are discussed in light of recent literature. (Texte intégral) conference_item info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581514/1/Chenu%20et%20al%20EcoSummit.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P33 - Chimie et physique du sol
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K10 - Production forestière
F01 - Culture des plantes
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P33 - Chimie et physique du sol
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K10 - Production forestière
F01 - Culture des plantes
spellingShingle F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P33 - Chimie et physique du sol
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K10 - Production forestière
F01 - Culture des plantes
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P33 - Chimie et physique du sol
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K10 - Production forestière
F01 - Culture des plantes
Chenu, Claire
Cardinael, Rémi
Autret, Bénédicte
Chevallier, Tiphaine
Girardin, Cyril
Mary, Bruno
Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?
description Increasing the world soils carbon stocks by a factor of 4 per mil annually would compensate the annual net increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. This statement is the core of an initiative launched by the French government at the recent COP21, followed by many countries and international bodies, which attracts political attention to the storage potential of C in soils. Compared to forest and pasture soils, agricultural soils have a higher C storage potential, because they are often characterized by low C contents, and increasing their C content is associated with benefits in terms of soil properties and ecosystem services. Here we quantified, under temperate conditions, the additional C storage related to the implementation of two set of practices that are recognized to be in the framework of agroecology: conservation tillage on the one hand and agroforestry on the other hand. These studies were based on long-term experiments, a 16-years comparison on cropping systems on luvisols in the Paris area and a 18-year-old silvoarable agroforestry trial, on fluvisols in southern France, the main crops being cereals in both cases. C stocks were measured on an equivalent soil mass basis. Both systems allowed for a net storage of C in soils, which are, for the equivalent of the 0-30 cm tilled layer, of 0.55 ± 0.16 t ha-1 yr-1 for conservation agriculture (i.e. no tillage with permanent soil coverage with an associated plant, fescue or alfalfa) and of 0.25 ± 0.03 t ha-1 yr-1 for the agroforestry system. These results are in line with estimates proposed in a recent French national assessment concerning the potential of agricultural practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Compared to recent literature, they further show that practices that increase C inputs to soil through additional biomass production would be more effective to store C in soil (tree rows, cover crops in conservation agriculture) than practices, such as no-tillage, that are assumed to reduce soil organic matter mineralisation rates. This questions our understanding of the stabilization processes of organic matter in soils and especially that of physical protection. The conditions and scale, both spatial and temporal, of physical protection of organic matter are discussed in light of recent literature. (Texte intégral)
format conference_item
topic_facet F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P33 - Chimie et physique du sol
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K10 - Production forestière
F01 - Culture des plantes
author Chenu, Claire
Cardinael, Rémi
Autret, Bénédicte
Chevallier, Tiphaine
Girardin, Cyril
Mary, Bruno
author_facet Chenu, Claire
Cardinael, Rémi
Autret, Bénédicte
Chevallier, Tiphaine
Girardin, Cyril
Mary, Bruno
author_sort Chenu, Claire
title Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?
title_short Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?
title_full Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?
title_fullStr Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?
title_full_unstemmed Agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?
title_sort agricultural practices that store organic carbon in soils: is it only a matter of inputs?
publisher INRA
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581514/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581514/1/Chenu%20et%20al%20EcoSummit.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chenuclaire agriculturalpracticesthatstoreorganiccarboninsoilsisitonlyamatterofinputs
AT cardinaelremi agriculturalpracticesthatstoreorganiccarboninsoilsisitonlyamatterofinputs
AT autretbenedicte agriculturalpracticesthatstoreorganiccarboninsoilsisitonlyamatterofinputs
AT chevalliertiphaine agriculturalpracticesthatstoreorganiccarboninsoilsisitonlyamatterofinputs
AT girardincyril agriculturalpracticesthatstoreorganiccarboninsoilsisitonlyamatterofinputs
AT marybruno agriculturalpracticesthatstoreorganiccarboninsoilsisitonlyamatterofinputs
_version_ 1758025065598812160