Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers
Effectiveness of current passive zoonotic disease surveillance systems is limited by the under-reporting of disease outbreaks in the domestic animal population. Evaluating the acceptability of passive surveillance and its economic, social and cultural determinants appears a critical step for improving it. A participatory rural appraisal was implemented in a rural subdistrict of Thailand. Focus group interviews were used to identify sanitary risks perceived by native chicken farmers and describe the structure of their value chain. Qualitative individual interviews with a large diversity of actors enabled to identify perceived costs and benefits associated with the reporting of HPAI suspicions to sanitary authorities. Besides, flows of information on HPAI suspected cases were assessed using network analysis, based on data collected through individual questionnaires. Results show that the presence of cockfighting activities in the area negatively affected the willingness of all chicken farmers and other actors to report suspected HPAI cases. The high financial and affective value of fighting cocks contradicted the HPAI control policy based on mass culling. However, the importance of product quality in the native chicken meat value chain and the free veterinary services and products delivered by veterinary officers had a positive impact on suspected case reporting. Besides, cockfighting practitioners had a significantly higher centrality than other actors in the information network and they facilitated the spatial diffusion of information. Social ties built in cockfighting activities and the shared purpose of protecting valuable cocks were at the basis of the diffusion of information and the informal collective management of diseases. Building bridges with this informal network would greatly improve the effectiveness of passive surveillance.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-580319 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
L73 - Maladies des animaux E50 - Sociologie rurale L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales Q03 - Contamination et toxicologie alimentaires surveillance épidémiologique étude de cas Influenzavirus aviaire environnement socioculturel approche participative agriculteur analyse économique perceptions analyse du risque contrôle continu facteur de risque coq poulet viande de poulet aviculture http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16411 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9017 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24950 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2805 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49895 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37936 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_32668 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24006 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1540 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24000 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_742 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 L73 - Maladies des animaux E50 - Sociologie rurale L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales Q03 - Contamination et toxicologie alimentaires surveillance épidémiologique étude de cas Influenzavirus aviaire environnement socioculturel approche participative agriculteur analyse économique perceptions analyse du risque contrôle continu facteur de risque coq poulet viande de poulet aviculture http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16411 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9017 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24950 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2805 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49895 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37936 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_32668 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24006 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1540 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24000 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_742 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 |
spellingShingle |
L73 - Maladies des animaux E50 - Sociologie rurale L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales Q03 - Contamination et toxicologie alimentaires surveillance épidémiologique étude de cas Influenzavirus aviaire environnement socioculturel approche participative agriculteur analyse économique perceptions analyse du risque contrôle continu facteur de risque coq poulet viande de poulet aviculture http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16411 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9017 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24950 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2805 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49895 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37936 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_32668 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24006 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1540 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24000 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_742 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 L73 - Maladies des animaux E50 - Sociologie rurale L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales Q03 - Contamination et toxicologie alimentaires surveillance épidémiologique étude de cas Influenzavirus aviaire environnement socioculturel approche participative agriculteur analyse économique perceptions analyse du risque contrôle continu facteur de risque coq poulet viande de poulet aviculture http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16411 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9017 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24950 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2805 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49895 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37936 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_32668 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24006 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1540 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24000 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_742 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 Delabouglise, Alexis Antoine-Moussiaux, Nicolas Tatong, D. Chumkaeo, A. Binot, Aurélie Fournié, Guillaume Pilot, E. Phimpraphi, W. Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Paul, Mathilde Duboz, Raphaël Salem, Gérard Peyre, Marie-Isabelle Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers |
description |
Effectiveness of current passive zoonotic disease surveillance systems is limited by the under-reporting of disease outbreaks in the domestic animal population. Evaluating the acceptability of passive surveillance and its economic, social and cultural determinants appears a critical step for improving it. A participatory rural appraisal was implemented in a rural subdistrict of Thailand. Focus group interviews were used to identify sanitary risks perceived by native chicken farmers and describe the structure of their value chain. Qualitative individual interviews with a large diversity of actors enabled to identify perceived costs and benefits associated with the reporting of HPAI suspicions to sanitary authorities. Besides, flows of information on HPAI suspected cases were assessed using network analysis, based on data collected through individual questionnaires. Results show that the presence of cockfighting activities in the area negatively affected the willingness of all chicken farmers and other actors to report suspected HPAI cases. The high financial and affective value of fighting cocks contradicted the HPAI control policy based on mass culling. However, the importance of product quality in the native chicken meat value chain and the free veterinary services and products delivered by veterinary officers had a positive impact on suspected case reporting. Besides, cockfighting practitioners had a significantly higher centrality than other actors in the information network and they facilitated the spatial diffusion of information. Social ties built in cockfighting activities and the shared purpose of protecting valuable cocks were at the basis of the diffusion of information and the informal collective management of diseases. Building bridges with this informal network would greatly improve the effectiveness of passive surveillance. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
L73 - Maladies des animaux E50 - Sociologie rurale L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales Q03 - Contamination et toxicologie alimentaires surveillance épidémiologique étude de cas Influenzavirus aviaire environnement socioculturel approche participative agriculteur analyse économique perceptions analyse du risque contrôle continu facteur de risque coq poulet viande de poulet aviculture http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16411 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9017 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24950 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2805 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49895 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37936 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_32668 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24006 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1540 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24000 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_742 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 |
author |
Delabouglise, Alexis Antoine-Moussiaux, Nicolas Tatong, D. Chumkaeo, A. Binot, Aurélie Fournié, Guillaume Pilot, E. Phimpraphi, W. Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Paul, Mathilde Duboz, Raphaël Salem, Gérard Peyre, Marie-Isabelle |
author_facet |
Delabouglise, Alexis Antoine-Moussiaux, Nicolas Tatong, D. Chumkaeo, A. Binot, Aurélie Fournié, Guillaume Pilot, E. Phimpraphi, W. Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Paul, Mathilde Duboz, Raphaël Salem, Gérard Peyre, Marie-Isabelle |
author_sort |
Delabouglise, Alexis |
title |
Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers |
title_short |
Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers |
title_full |
Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers |
title_fullStr |
Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers |
title_sort |
cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: the case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and thailand native chicken farmers |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/580319/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/580319/1/ADelabouglise_Peyre_2016.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT delabouglisealexis culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT antoinemoussiauxnicolas culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT tatongd culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT chumkaeoa culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT binotaurelie culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT fournieguillaume culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT pilote culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT phimpraphiw culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT kasemsuwansuwicha culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT paulmathilde culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT dubozraphael culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT salemgerard culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers AT peyremarieisabelle culturalpracticesshapingzoonoticdiseasessurveillancethecaseofhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaandthailandnativechickenfarmers |
_version_ |
1792499041448230912 |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5803192024-01-28T23:27:07Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/580319/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/580319/ Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers. Delabouglise Alexis, Antoine-Moussiaux Nicolas, Tatong D., Chumkaeo A., Binot Aurélie, Fournié Guillaume, Pilot E., Phimpraphi W., Kasemsuwan Suwicha, Paul Mathilde, Duboz Raphaël, Salem Gérard, Peyre Marie-Isabelle. 2017. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 64 (4) : 1294-1305.https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12506 <https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12506> Cultural practices shaping zoonotic diseases surveillance: The case of highly pathogenic avian influenza and Thailand native chicken farmers Delabouglise, Alexis Antoine-Moussiaux, Nicolas Tatong, D. Chumkaeo, A. Binot, Aurélie Fournié, Guillaume Pilot, E. Phimpraphi, W. Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Paul, Mathilde Duboz, Raphaël Salem, Gérard Peyre, Marie-Isabelle eng 2017 Transboundary and Emerging Diseases L73 - Maladies des animaux E50 - Sociologie rurale L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales Q03 - Contamination et toxicologie alimentaires surveillance épidémiologique étude de cas Influenzavirus aviaire environnement socioculturel approche participative agriculteur analyse économique perceptions analyse du risque contrôle continu facteur de risque coq poulet viande de poulet aviculture http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16411 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9017 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24950 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2805 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2469 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49895 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37936 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_32668 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24006 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1540 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24000 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_742 Thaïlande http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701 Effectiveness of current passive zoonotic disease surveillance systems is limited by the under-reporting of disease outbreaks in the domestic animal population. Evaluating the acceptability of passive surveillance and its economic, social and cultural determinants appears a critical step for improving it. A participatory rural appraisal was implemented in a rural subdistrict of Thailand. Focus group interviews were used to identify sanitary risks perceived by native chicken farmers and describe the structure of their value chain. Qualitative individual interviews with a large diversity of actors enabled to identify perceived costs and benefits associated with the reporting of HPAI suspicions to sanitary authorities. Besides, flows of information on HPAI suspected cases were assessed using network analysis, based on data collected through individual questionnaires. Results show that the presence of cockfighting activities in the area negatively affected the willingness of all chicken farmers and other actors to report suspected HPAI cases. The high financial and affective value of fighting cocks contradicted the HPAI control policy based on mass culling. However, the importance of product quality in the native chicken meat value chain and the free veterinary services and products delivered by veterinary officers had a positive impact on suspected case reporting. Besides, cockfighting practitioners had a significantly higher centrality than other actors in the information network and they facilitated the spatial diffusion of information. Social ties built in cockfighting activities and the shared purpose of protecting valuable cocks were at the basis of the diffusion of information and the informal collective management of diseases. Building bridges with this informal network would greatly improve the effectiveness of passive surveillance. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/580319/1/ADelabouglise_Peyre_2016.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12506 10.1111/tbed.12506 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/tbed.12506 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12506 |