Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe

We tested whether cultivation and fallowing have any significant effect on tree species diversity and dominance in semi-arid Zimbabwe. To this end, we quantified tree species diversity and physiognomy on two soil types (mutapo and bandati) stratified into three land-use categories, i.e., cultivated land, fallow land and woodland. Results showed that tree species diversity was significantly different on the two soil types. Tree species diversity was high on bandati soil and low on mutapo soil. Results also showed that there was significant difference in tree species diversity among the three land-use categories on mutapo soil but no differences on bandati soil. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences in species diversity between paired categories on mutapo soil but no significant differences on bandati soil. Tree physiognomy was significantly different among all three land use categories. Colophospermum mopane and Diospyros kirkii were the dominant species within woodlands, while Acacia tortilis subsp. spirocarpa replaced them as the dominant species within the fallow land category. These results indicate that woodland conversion for cultivation purposes has no immediate significant effect on tree species diversity on bandati soil, while it has a pronounced effect on mutapo soil, at least in the short term.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tambara, Edwin, Murwira, Amon, Kativu, Shakie, Torquebiau, Emmanuel
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, biodiversité, conservation des ressources, espèce, arbre, jachère, forêt, terre cultivée, utilisation des terres, type de sol, agroforesterie, évaluation de l'impact sur l'environnement, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34007, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16212, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7204, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33483, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8516,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563476/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563476/1/document_563476.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-563476
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5634762024-01-28T20:12:35Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563476/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563476/ Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe. Tambara Edwin, Murwira Amon, Kativu Shakie, Torquebiau Emmanuel. 2012. Agroforestry Systems, 84 (2) : 299-309.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9467-3 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9467-3> Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe Tambara, Edwin Murwira, Amon Kativu, Shakie Torquebiau, Emmanuel eng 2012 Agroforestry Systems P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales biodiversité conservation des ressources espèce arbre jachère forêt terre cultivée utilisation des terres type de sol agroforesterie évaluation de l'impact sur l'environnement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34007 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16212 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7204 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33483 Zimbabwe http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8516 We tested whether cultivation and fallowing have any significant effect on tree species diversity and dominance in semi-arid Zimbabwe. To this end, we quantified tree species diversity and physiognomy on two soil types (mutapo and bandati) stratified into three land-use categories, i.e., cultivated land, fallow land and woodland. Results showed that tree species diversity was significantly different on the two soil types. Tree species diversity was high on bandati soil and low on mutapo soil. Results also showed that there was significant difference in tree species diversity among the three land-use categories on mutapo soil but no differences on bandati soil. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences in species diversity between paired categories on mutapo soil but no significant differences on bandati soil. Tree physiognomy was significantly different among all three land use categories. Colophospermum mopane and Diospyros kirkii were the dominant species within woodlands, while Acacia tortilis subsp. spirocarpa replaced them as the dominant species within the fallow land category. These results indicate that woodland conversion for cultivation purposes has no immediate significant effect on tree species diversity on bandati soil, while it has a pronounced effect on mutapo soil, at least in the short term. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563476/1/document_563476.pdf application/pdf Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9467-3 10.1007/s10457-011-9467-3 http://catalogue-bibliotheques.cirad.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=214159 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10457-011-9467-3 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9467-3
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
biodiversité
conservation des ressources
espèce
arbre
jachère
forêt
terre cultivée
utilisation des terres
type de sol
agroforesterie
évaluation de l'impact sur l'environnement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34007
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16212
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7204
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33483
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8516
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
biodiversité
conservation des ressources
espèce
arbre
jachère
forêt
terre cultivée
utilisation des terres
type de sol
agroforesterie
évaluation de l'impact sur l'environnement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34007
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16212
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7204
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33483
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8516
spellingShingle P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
biodiversité
conservation des ressources
espèce
arbre
jachère
forêt
terre cultivée
utilisation des terres
type de sol
agroforesterie
évaluation de l'impact sur l'environnement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34007
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16212
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7204
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33483
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8516
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
biodiversité
conservation des ressources
espèce
arbre
jachère
forêt
terre cultivée
utilisation des terres
type de sol
agroforesterie
évaluation de l'impact sur l'environnement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34007
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16212
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7204
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33483
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8516
Tambara, Edwin
Murwira, Amon
Kativu, Shakie
Torquebiau, Emmanuel
Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe
description We tested whether cultivation and fallowing have any significant effect on tree species diversity and dominance in semi-arid Zimbabwe. To this end, we quantified tree species diversity and physiognomy on two soil types (mutapo and bandati) stratified into three land-use categories, i.e., cultivated land, fallow land and woodland. Results showed that tree species diversity was significantly different on the two soil types. Tree species diversity was high on bandati soil and low on mutapo soil. Results also showed that there was significant difference in tree species diversity among the three land-use categories on mutapo soil but no differences on bandati soil. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences in species diversity between paired categories on mutapo soil but no significant differences on bandati soil. Tree physiognomy was significantly different among all three land use categories. Colophospermum mopane and Diospyros kirkii were the dominant species within woodlands, while Acacia tortilis subsp. spirocarpa replaced them as the dominant species within the fallow land category. These results indicate that woodland conversion for cultivation purposes has no immediate significant effect on tree species diversity on bandati soil, while it has a pronounced effect on mutapo soil, at least in the short term.
format article
topic_facet P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
biodiversité
conservation des ressources
espèce
arbre
jachère
forêt
terre cultivée
utilisation des terres
type de sol
agroforesterie
évaluation de l'impact sur l'environnement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34007
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16212
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7204
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33483
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8516
author Tambara, Edwin
Murwira, Amon
Kativu, Shakie
Torquebiau, Emmanuel
author_facet Tambara, Edwin
Murwira, Amon
Kativu, Shakie
Torquebiau, Emmanuel
author_sort Tambara, Edwin
title Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe
title_short Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe
title_full Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe
title_sort farming does not necessarily conflict with tree diversity in the mid-zambezi valley, zimbabwe
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563476/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563476/1/document_563476.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tambaraedwin farmingdoesnotnecessarilyconflictwithtreediversityinthemidzambezivalleyzimbabwe
AT murwiraamon farmingdoesnotnecessarilyconflictwithtreediversityinthemidzambezivalleyzimbabwe
AT kativushakie farmingdoesnotnecessarilyconflictwithtreediversityinthemidzambezivalleyzimbabwe
AT torquebiauemmanuel farmingdoesnotnecessarilyconflictwithtreediversityinthemidzambezivalleyzimbabwe
_version_ 1792498106727661568