Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view

Conservation agriculture is claimed to be a panacea for the problems of poor agricultural productivity and soil degradation in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). It is actively promoted by international research and development organisations, with such strong advocacy that critical debate is stifled. Claims for the potential of CA in Africa are based on widespread adoption in the Americas, where the effects of tillage were replaced by heavy dependence on herbicides and fertilizers. CA is said to increase yields, to reduce labour requirements, improve soil fertility and reduce erosion. Yet empirical evidence is not clear and consistent on many of these points nor is it always clear which of the principles of CA contribute to the desired effects. Although cases can be found where such claims are supported there are equally convincing scientific reports that contradict these claims. Concerns include decreased yields often observed with CA, increased labour requirements when herbicides are not used, an important gender shift of the labour burden to women and a lack of mulch due to poor productivity and due to the priority given to feeding of livestock with crop residues. Despite the publicity claiming widespread adoption of CA, the available evidence suggests virtually no uptake of CA in most SSA countries, with only small groups of adopters in South Africa, Ghana and Zambia. We conclude that there is an urgent need for critical assessment under which ecological and socio-economic conditions CA is best suited for smallholder farming in SSA. Critical constraints to adoption appear to be competing uses for crop residues, increased labour demand for weeding, and lack of access to, and use of external inputs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giller, Ken E., Witter, Ernst, Corbeels, Marc, Tittonell, Pablo
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Elsevier
Subjects:F07 - Façons culturales, P35 - Fertilité du sol, E16 - Économie de la production, L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales, F01 - Culture des plantes, agriculture alternative, plante de culture, non-travail du sol, petite exploitation agricole, résidu de récolte, mulch, fertilité du sol, matière organique du sol, rôle des femmes, main d'oeuvre féminine, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8511, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16118, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4977, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35657, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15513, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2852, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_166,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/551043/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/551043/1/document_551043.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-551043
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5510432024-12-18T14:17:48Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/551043/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/551043/ Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view. Giller Ken E., Witter Ernst, Corbeels Marc, Tittonell Pablo. 2009. Field Crops Research, 114 (1) : 23-34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017> Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view Giller, Ken E. Witter, Ernst Corbeels, Marc Tittonell, Pablo eng 2009 Elsevier Field Crops Research F07 - Façons culturales P35 - Fertilité du sol E16 - Économie de la production L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales F01 - Culture des plantes agriculture alternative plante de culture non-travail du sol petite exploitation agricole résidu de récolte mulch fertilité du sol matière organique du sol rôle des femmes main d'oeuvre féminine http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8511 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16118 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4977 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35657 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15513 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2852 Afrique au sud du Sahara http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_166 Conservation agriculture is claimed to be a panacea for the problems of poor agricultural productivity and soil degradation in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). It is actively promoted by international research and development organisations, with such strong advocacy that critical debate is stifled. Claims for the potential of CA in Africa are based on widespread adoption in the Americas, where the effects of tillage were replaced by heavy dependence on herbicides and fertilizers. CA is said to increase yields, to reduce labour requirements, improve soil fertility and reduce erosion. Yet empirical evidence is not clear and consistent on many of these points nor is it always clear which of the principles of CA contribute to the desired effects. Although cases can be found where such claims are supported there are equally convincing scientific reports that contradict these claims. Concerns include decreased yields often observed with CA, increased labour requirements when herbicides are not used, an important gender shift of the labour burden to women and a lack of mulch due to poor productivity and due to the priority given to feeding of livestock with crop residues. Despite the publicity claiming widespread adoption of CA, the available evidence suggests virtually no uptake of CA in most SSA countries, with only small groups of adopters in South Africa, Ghana and Zambia. We conclude that there is an urgent need for critical assessment under which ecological and socio-economic conditions CA is best suited for smallholder farming in SSA. Critical constraints to adoption appear to be competing uses for crop residues, increased labour demand for weeding, and lack of access to, and use of external inputs. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/551043/1/document_551043.pdf application/pdf Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic F07 - Façons culturales
P35 - Fertilité du sol
E16 - Économie de la production
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
F01 - Culture des plantes
agriculture alternative
plante de culture
non-travail du sol
petite exploitation agricole
résidu de récolte
mulch
fertilité du sol
matière organique du sol
rôle des femmes
main d'oeuvre féminine
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8511
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16118
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4977
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35657
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15513
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2852
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_166
F07 - Façons culturales
P35 - Fertilité du sol
E16 - Économie de la production
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
F01 - Culture des plantes
agriculture alternative
plante de culture
non-travail du sol
petite exploitation agricole
résidu de récolte
mulch
fertilité du sol
matière organique du sol
rôle des femmes
main d'oeuvre féminine
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8511
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16118
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4977
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35657
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15513
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2852
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_166
spellingShingle F07 - Façons culturales
P35 - Fertilité du sol
E16 - Économie de la production
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
F01 - Culture des plantes
agriculture alternative
plante de culture
non-travail du sol
petite exploitation agricole
résidu de récolte
mulch
fertilité du sol
matière organique du sol
rôle des femmes
main d'oeuvre féminine
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8511
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16118
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4977
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35657
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15513
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2852
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_166
F07 - Façons culturales
P35 - Fertilité du sol
E16 - Économie de la production
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
F01 - Culture des plantes
agriculture alternative
plante de culture
non-travail du sol
petite exploitation agricole
résidu de récolte
mulch
fertilité du sol
matière organique du sol
rôle des femmes
main d'oeuvre féminine
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8511
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16118
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4977
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35657
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15513
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2852
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_166
Giller, Ken E.
Witter, Ernst
Corbeels, Marc
Tittonell, Pablo
Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view
description Conservation agriculture is claimed to be a panacea for the problems of poor agricultural productivity and soil degradation in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). It is actively promoted by international research and development organisations, with such strong advocacy that critical debate is stifled. Claims for the potential of CA in Africa are based on widespread adoption in the Americas, where the effects of tillage were replaced by heavy dependence on herbicides and fertilizers. CA is said to increase yields, to reduce labour requirements, improve soil fertility and reduce erosion. Yet empirical evidence is not clear and consistent on many of these points nor is it always clear which of the principles of CA contribute to the desired effects. Although cases can be found where such claims are supported there are equally convincing scientific reports that contradict these claims. Concerns include decreased yields often observed with CA, increased labour requirements when herbicides are not used, an important gender shift of the labour burden to women and a lack of mulch due to poor productivity and due to the priority given to feeding of livestock with crop residues. Despite the publicity claiming widespread adoption of CA, the available evidence suggests virtually no uptake of CA in most SSA countries, with only small groups of adopters in South Africa, Ghana and Zambia. We conclude that there is an urgent need for critical assessment under which ecological and socio-economic conditions CA is best suited for smallholder farming in SSA. Critical constraints to adoption appear to be competing uses for crop residues, increased labour demand for weeding, and lack of access to, and use of external inputs.
format article
topic_facet F07 - Façons culturales
P35 - Fertilité du sol
E16 - Économie de la production
L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales
F01 - Culture des plantes
agriculture alternative
plante de culture
non-travail du sol
petite exploitation agricole
résidu de récolte
mulch
fertilité du sol
matière organique du sol
rôle des femmes
main d'oeuvre féminine
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28792
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8511
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16118
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4977
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7170
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35657
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15513
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2852
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_166
author Giller, Ken E.
Witter, Ernst
Corbeels, Marc
Tittonell, Pablo
author_facet Giller, Ken E.
Witter, Ernst
Corbeels, Marc
Tittonell, Pablo
author_sort Giller, Ken E.
title Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view
title_short Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view
title_full Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view
title_fullStr Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view
title_full_unstemmed Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view
title_sort conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in africa: the heretics' view
publisher Elsevier
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/551043/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/551043/1/document_551043.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gillerkene conservationagricultureandsmallholderfarminginafricathehereticsview
AT witterernst conservationagricultureandsmallholderfarminginafricathehereticsview
AT corbeelsmarc conservationagricultureandsmallholderfarminginafricathehereticsview
AT tittonellpablo conservationagricultureandsmallholderfarminginafricathehereticsview
_version_ 1819042118798147584