Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu

In order to identify the selection mechanism of two sympatric African browsers, we analysed encounter rates and selection of hushes along foraging pathways. We monitored the tracks, left overnight, by kudu and impala on an experimental plot of natural Acacia nilotica and Dichrostachys cinerea in the highveld of Zimbabwe, and recorded the number of bushes attacked in each category. Both ungulates were selective for the bush categories, but kudu were consistently more selective than impala, and showed a higher preference for the larger A. nilotica and D. cinerea bushes, which had a significantly greater number of bites which were not reachable by impala. For both kudu and impala, the probability of attacking larger bushes increased significantly with the proportion of large bushes encountered along the foraging pathways, whereas the consumption of smaller bushes was apparently unpredictable. For the most abundant food item (medium D. cinerea), the probability of attack by impala along a pathway decreased with increasing proportions of larger bushes in the experimental area, but was also dependent on impala group size and season. In addition, we found that encounter rates with larger bushes were significantly higher for kudu than for impala. Experimentally reducing the availability of the larger bushes had little effect on both impala and kudu during the following rainy season. However, during the following cool dry season, kudu showed an increased selectivity with a strong preference for the remaining large bushes (large A. nilotica), followed by a sharp decrease in selectivity in the hot dry season when they also fed from significant numbers of medium trees. Impala had little reaction to the experimental changes in the availability of bush categories in either season. We suggest that both kudu and impala selected bushes on the basis of the potential number of bites they can provide, and this resulted in different search strategies. Kudu focussed on the larger bushes which have a larger number of twigs which are out of reach of impala and kudu also probably directed their path preferentially towards the few larger bushes to maximize encounter rates with this favoured bush category. These differences in bush selection process lead to a low overlap in resource use between the two browsers in this type of savanna.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel, Fritz, Hervé, Gordon, Iain J., Illius, Andrew W.
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:L20 - Écologie animale, compétition animale, alimentation des animaux, parcours, espèce en danger, herbivore, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35268, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_429, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6448, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2557, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3567,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/535518/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/535518/1/document_535518.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-535518
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5355182024-01-28T14:57:12Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/535518/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/535518/ Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu. De Garine-Wichatitsky Michel, Fritz Hervé, Gordon Iain J., Illius Andrew W.. 2004. Oecologia, 141 (1) : 66-75.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1630-3 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1630-3> Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel Fritz, Hervé Gordon, Iain J. Illius, Andrew W. eng 2004 Oecologia L20 - Écologie animale compétition animale alimentation des animaux parcours espèce en danger herbivore http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35268 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_429 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6448 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2557 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3567 In order to identify the selection mechanism of two sympatric African browsers, we analysed encounter rates and selection of hushes along foraging pathways. We monitored the tracks, left overnight, by kudu and impala on an experimental plot of natural Acacia nilotica and Dichrostachys cinerea in the highveld of Zimbabwe, and recorded the number of bushes attacked in each category. Both ungulates were selective for the bush categories, but kudu were consistently more selective than impala, and showed a higher preference for the larger A. nilotica and D. cinerea bushes, which had a significantly greater number of bites which were not reachable by impala. For both kudu and impala, the probability of attacking larger bushes increased significantly with the proportion of large bushes encountered along the foraging pathways, whereas the consumption of smaller bushes was apparently unpredictable. For the most abundant food item (medium D. cinerea), the probability of attack by impala along a pathway decreased with increasing proportions of larger bushes in the experimental area, but was also dependent on impala group size and season. In addition, we found that encounter rates with larger bushes were significantly higher for kudu than for impala. Experimentally reducing the availability of the larger bushes had little effect on both impala and kudu during the following rainy season. However, during the following cool dry season, kudu showed an increased selectivity with a strong preference for the remaining large bushes (large A. nilotica), followed by a sharp decrease in selectivity in the hot dry season when they also fed from significant numbers of medium trees. Impala had little reaction to the experimental changes in the availability of bush categories in either season. We suggest that both kudu and impala selected bushes on the basis of the potential number of bites they can provide, and this resulted in different search strategies. Kudu focussed on the larger bushes which have a larger number of twigs which are out of reach of impala and kudu also probably directed their path preferentially towards the few larger bushes to maximize encounter rates with this favoured bush category. These differences in bush selection process lead to a low overlap in resource use between the two browsers in this type of savanna. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/535518/1/document_535518.pdf application/pdf Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1630-3 10.1007/s00442-004-1630-3 http://catalogue-bibliotheques.cirad.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=194308 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00442-004-1630-3 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1630-3
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic L20 - Écologie animale
compétition animale
alimentation des animaux
parcours
espèce en danger
herbivore
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35268
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_429
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6448
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2557
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3567
L20 - Écologie animale
compétition animale
alimentation des animaux
parcours
espèce en danger
herbivore
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35268
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_429
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6448
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2557
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3567
spellingShingle L20 - Écologie animale
compétition animale
alimentation des animaux
parcours
espèce en danger
herbivore
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35268
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_429
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6448
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2557
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3567
L20 - Écologie animale
compétition animale
alimentation des animaux
parcours
espèce en danger
herbivore
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35268
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_429
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6448
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2557
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3567
De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel
Fritz, Hervé
Gordon, Iain J.
Illius, Andrew W.
Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu
description In order to identify the selection mechanism of two sympatric African browsers, we analysed encounter rates and selection of hushes along foraging pathways. We monitored the tracks, left overnight, by kudu and impala on an experimental plot of natural Acacia nilotica and Dichrostachys cinerea in the highveld of Zimbabwe, and recorded the number of bushes attacked in each category. Both ungulates were selective for the bush categories, but kudu were consistently more selective than impala, and showed a higher preference for the larger A. nilotica and D. cinerea bushes, which had a significantly greater number of bites which were not reachable by impala. For both kudu and impala, the probability of attacking larger bushes increased significantly with the proportion of large bushes encountered along the foraging pathways, whereas the consumption of smaller bushes was apparently unpredictable. For the most abundant food item (medium D. cinerea), the probability of attack by impala along a pathway decreased with increasing proportions of larger bushes in the experimental area, but was also dependent on impala group size and season. In addition, we found that encounter rates with larger bushes were significantly higher for kudu than for impala. Experimentally reducing the availability of the larger bushes had little effect on both impala and kudu during the following rainy season. However, during the following cool dry season, kudu showed an increased selectivity with a strong preference for the remaining large bushes (large A. nilotica), followed by a sharp decrease in selectivity in the hot dry season when they also fed from significant numbers of medium trees. Impala had little reaction to the experimental changes in the availability of bush categories in either season. We suggest that both kudu and impala selected bushes on the basis of the potential number of bites they can provide, and this resulted in different search strategies. Kudu focussed on the larger bushes which have a larger number of twigs which are out of reach of impala and kudu also probably directed their path preferentially towards the few larger bushes to maximize encounter rates with this favoured bush category. These differences in bush selection process lead to a low overlap in resource use between the two browsers in this type of savanna.
format article
topic_facet L20 - Écologie animale
compétition animale
alimentation des animaux
parcours
espèce en danger
herbivore
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35268
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_429
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6448
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2557
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3567
author De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel
Fritz, Hervé
Gordon, Iain J.
Illius, Andrew W.
author_facet De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel
Fritz, Hervé
Gordon, Iain J.
Illius, Andrew W.
author_sort De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel
title Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu
title_short Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu
title_full Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu
title_fullStr Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu
title_full_unstemmed Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu
title_sort bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/535518/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/535518/1/document_535518.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT degarinewichatitskymichel bushselectionalongforagingpathwaysbysympatricimpalaandgreaterkudu
AT fritzherve bushselectionalongforagingpathwaysbysympatricimpalaandgreaterkudu
AT gordoniainj bushselectionalongforagingpathwaysbysympatricimpalaandgreaterkudu
AT illiusandreww bushselectionalongforagingpathwaysbysympatricimpalaandgreaterkudu
_version_ 1792496581069504512