To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa
Common property resource disputes are increasing, due to increase in competition and deterioration of quality. Cooperative arrangements have long been in the center of public interest regarding the mechanisms used by communities that share them. Two main approaches have been applied separately, namely negotiation approaches and cooperative game theory. Although the two approaches depart from different directions and are based on different assumptions, they complement each other as they are based on similar principles of fairness and efficiency and can both be seen as leading to cooperative outcomes. In this paper we apply the Role-Playing Game that is a component of the Companion Modeling approach - a negotiation procedure, and Cooperative Game Theory (Shapley value and the nucleolus) to a water allocation problem in the Kat watershed in South Africa. We use simplifying assumptions to allow a comparable solution. The negotiation and the cooperative game theory provide similar trends vis a vis the various players and their outcomes. Our conclusion is that Cooperative Game Theory and Negotiation approaches may be complementary to each other.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | conference_item biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
s.n.
|
Subjects: | P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion, U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques, |
Online Access: | http://agritrop.cirad.fr/532890/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/532890/1/document_532890.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cirad-fr-532890 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5328902022-04-20T13:29:35Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/532890/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/532890/ To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa. Dinar Ariel, Farolfi Stefano, Patrone Fioravante, Rowntree Kate. 2006. In : 6th Meeting on game theory and practice, Zaragoza, Spain 10 - 12 July 2006. s.l. : s.n., 27 p. Meeting on Game Theory and Practice. 6, Zaragoza, Espagne, 10 Juillet 2006/12 Juillet 2006. Researchers To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa Dinar, Ariel Farolfi, Stefano Patrone, Fioravante Rowntree, Kate eng 2006 s.n. 6th Meeting on game theory and practice, Zaragoza, Spain 10 - 12 July 2006 P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques Common property resource disputes are increasing, due to increase in competition and deterioration of quality. Cooperative arrangements have long been in the center of public interest regarding the mechanisms used by communities that share them. Two main approaches have been applied separately, namely negotiation approaches and cooperative game theory. Although the two approaches depart from different directions and are based on different assumptions, they complement each other as they are based on similar principles of fairness and efficiency and can both be seen as leading to cooperative outcomes. In this paper we apply the Role-Playing Game that is a component of the Companion Modeling approach - a negotiation procedure, and Cooperative Game Theory (Shapley value and the nucleolus) to a water allocation problem in the Kat watershed in South Africa. We use simplifying assumptions to allow a comparable solution. The negotiation and the cooperative game theory provide similar trends vis a vis the various players and their outcomes. Our conclusion is that Cooperative Game Theory and Negotiation approaches may be complementary to each other. conference_item info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/532890/1/document_532890.pdf application/pdf Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html http://catalogue-bibliotheques.cirad.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=191710 |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques |
spellingShingle |
P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques Dinar, Ariel Farolfi, Stefano Patrone, Fioravante Rowntree, Kate To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa |
description |
Common property resource disputes are increasing, due to increase in competition and deterioration of quality. Cooperative arrangements have long been in the center of public interest regarding the mechanisms used by communities that share them. Two main approaches have been applied separately, namely negotiation approaches and cooperative game theory. Although the two approaches depart from different directions and are based on different assumptions, they complement each other as they are based on similar principles of fairness and efficiency and can both be seen as leading to cooperative outcomes. In this paper we apply the Role-Playing Game that is a component of the Companion Modeling approach - a negotiation procedure, and Cooperative Game Theory (Shapley value and the nucleolus) to a water allocation problem in the Kat watershed in South Africa. We use simplifying assumptions to allow a comparable solution. The negotiation and the cooperative game theory provide similar trends vis a vis the various players and their outcomes. Our conclusion is that Cooperative Game Theory and Negotiation approaches may be complementary to each other. |
format |
conference_item |
topic_facet |
P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques |
author |
Dinar, Ariel Farolfi, Stefano Patrone, Fioravante Rowntree, Kate |
author_facet |
Dinar, Ariel Farolfi, Stefano Patrone, Fioravante Rowntree, Kate |
author_sort |
Dinar, Ariel |
title |
To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa |
title_short |
To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa |
title_full |
To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa |
title_fullStr |
To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
To negotiate or to game theorize: Negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the Kat Basin, South Africa |
title_sort |
to negotiate or to game theorize: negociation vs. game theory outcomes for water allocation problems in the kat basin, south africa |
publisher |
s.n. |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/532890/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/532890/1/document_532890.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dinarariel tonegotiateortogametheorizenegociationvsgametheoryoutcomesforwaterallocationproblemsinthekatbasinsouthafrica AT farolfistefano tonegotiateortogametheorizenegociationvsgametheoryoutcomesforwaterallocationproblemsinthekatbasinsouthafrica AT patronefioravante tonegotiateortogametheorizenegociationvsgametheoryoutcomesforwaterallocationproblemsinthekatbasinsouthafrica AT rowntreekate tonegotiateortogametheorizenegociationvsgametheoryoutcomesforwaterallocationproblemsinthekatbasinsouthafrica |
_version_ |
1758020951335763968 |