Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?

Most food in sub-Saharan Africa is produced on small farms. Using large datasets from household surveys conducted across many countries, we find that the majority of farms are less than 1 ha, much smaller than previous estimates. Farms are larger in farming systems in drier climates. Through a detailed analysis of food self-sufficiency, food and nutrition security, and income among households from divergent farming systems in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda, we reveal marked contrasts in food security and household incomes. In the south of Mali, where cotton is an important cash crop, almost all households are food secure, and almost half earn a living income. Yet, in a similar agroecological environment in northern Ghana, only 10% of households are food secure and none earn a living income. Surprisingly, the extent of food insecurity and poverty is almost as great in densely-populated locations in the Ethiopian and Tanzanian highlands that are characterised by much better soils and two cropping seasons a year. Where populations are less dense, such as in South-west Uganda, a larger proportion of the households are food self-sufficient and poverty is less prevalent. In densely-populated Central Malawi, a combination of a single cropping season a year and small farms results in a strong incidence of food insecurity and poverty. These examples reveal a strong interplay between population density, farm size, market access, and agroecological potential on food security and household incomes. Within each location, farm size is a major determinant of food self-sufficiency and a household’s ability to rise above the living income threshold. Closing yield gaps strongly increases the proportion of households that are food self-sufficient. Yet in four of the locations (Ethiopia, Tanzania, Ghana and Malawi), land is so constraining that only 42–53% of households achieve food self-sufficiency, and even when yield gaps are closed only a small proportion of households can achieve a living income. While farming remains of central importance to household food security and income, our results help to explain why off-farm employment is a must for many. We discuss these results in relation to sub-Saharan Africa’s increasing population, likely agricultural expansion, and agriculture’s role in future economic development.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giller, K.E., Delaune, T., Silva, J.V., Wijk, M.T. van, Hammond, J., Descheemaeker, K., van de Ven, G., Schut, A.G.T., Taulya, G., Chikowo, R., Andersson, J.A.
Format: Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021
Subjects:AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, Agroecological Zones, Living Income, FARM SIZE, YIELD GAP, AGROECOLOGY, INCOME, SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21714
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cimmyt-10883-21714
record_format koha
spelling dig-cimmyt-10883-217142022-01-11T14:47:41Z Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options? Giller, K.E. Delaune, T. Silva, J.V. Wijk, M.T. van Hammond, J. Descheemaeker, K. van de Ven, G. Schut, A.G.T. Taulya, G. Chikowo, R. Andersson, J.A. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Agroecological Zones Living Income FARM SIZE YIELD GAP AGROECOLOGY INCOME SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION Most food in sub-Saharan Africa is produced on small farms. Using large datasets from household surveys conducted across many countries, we find that the majority of farms are less than 1 ha, much smaller than previous estimates. Farms are larger in farming systems in drier climates. Through a detailed analysis of food self-sufficiency, food and nutrition security, and income among households from divergent farming systems in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda, we reveal marked contrasts in food security and household incomes. In the south of Mali, where cotton is an important cash crop, almost all households are food secure, and almost half earn a living income. Yet, in a similar agroecological environment in northern Ghana, only 10% of households are food secure and none earn a living income. Surprisingly, the extent of food insecurity and poverty is almost as great in densely-populated locations in the Ethiopian and Tanzanian highlands that are characterised by much better soils and two cropping seasons a year. Where populations are less dense, such as in South-west Uganda, a larger proportion of the households are food self-sufficient and poverty is less prevalent. In densely-populated Central Malawi, a combination of a single cropping season a year and small farms results in a strong incidence of food insecurity and poverty. These examples reveal a strong interplay between population density, farm size, market access, and agroecological potential on food security and household incomes. Within each location, farm size is a major determinant of food self-sufficiency and a household’s ability to rise above the living income threshold. Closing yield gaps strongly increases the proportion of households that are food self-sufficient. Yet in four of the locations (Ethiopia, Tanzania, Ghana and Malawi), land is so constraining that only 42–53% of households achieve food self-sufficiency, and even when yield gaps are closed only a small proportion of households can achieve a living income. While farming remains of central importance to household food security and income, our results help to explain why off-farm employment is a must for many. We discuss these results in relation to sub-Saharan Africa’s increasing population, likely agricultural expansion, and agriculture’s role in future economic development. 1431-1454 2021-10-27T00:25:21Z 2021-10-27T00:25:21Z 2021 Article Published Version https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21714 10.1007/s12571-021-01209-0 English https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12571-021-01209-0#Sec20 CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose Open Access Netherlands Springer 6 13 1876-4517 Food Security
institution CIMMYT
collection DSpace
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cimmyt
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname CIMMYT Library
language English
topic AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agroecological Zones
Living Income
FARM SIZE
YIELD GAP
AGROECOLOGY
INCOME
SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agroecological Zones
Living Income
FARM SIZE
YIELD GAP
AGROECOLOGY
INCOME
SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION
spellingShingle AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agroecological Zones
Living Income
FARM SIZE
YIELD GAP
AGROECOLOGY
INCOME
SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agroecological Zones
Living Income
FARM SIZE
YIELD GAP
AGROECOLOGY
INCOME
SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION
Giller, K.E.
Delaune, T.
Silva, J.V.
Wijk, M.T. van
Hammond, J.
Descheemaeker, K.
van de Ven, G.
Schut, A.G.T.
Taulya, G.
Chikowo, R.
Andersson, J.A.
Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
description Most food in sub-Saharan Africa is produced on small farms. Using large datasets from household surveys conducted across many countries, we find that the majority of farms are less than 1 ha, much smaller than previous estimates. Farms are larger in farming systems in drier climates. Through a detailed analysis of food self-sufficiency, food and nutrition security, and income among households from divergent farming systems in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda, we reveal marked contrasts in food security and household incomes. In the south of Mali, where cotton is an important cash crop, almost all households are food secure, and almost half earn a living income. Yet, in a similar agroecological environment in northern Ghana, only 10% of households are food secure and none earn a living income. Surprisingly, the extent of food insecurity and poverty is almost as great in densely-populated locations in the Ethiopian and Tanzanian highlands that are characterised by much better soils and two cropping seasons a year. Where populations are less dense, such as in South-west Uganda, a larger proportion of the households are food self-sufficient and poverty is less prevalent. In densely-populated Central Malawi, a combination of a single cropping season a year and small farms results in a strong incidence of food insecurity and poverty. These examples reveal a strong interplay between population density, farm size, market access, and agroecological potential on food security and household incomes. Within each location, farm size is a major determinant of food self-sufficiency and a household’s ability to rise above the living income threshold. Closing yield gaps strongly increases the proportion of households that are food self-sufficient. Yet in four of the locations (Ethiopia, Tanzania, Ghana and Malawi), land is so constraining that only 42–53% of households achieve food self-sufficiency, and even when yield gaps are closed only a small proportion of households can achieve a living income. While farming remains of central importance to household food security and income, our results help to explain why off-farm employment is a must for many. We discuss these results in relation to sub-Saharan Africa’s increasing population, likely agricultural expansion, and agriculture’s role in future economic development.
format Article
topic_facet AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agroecological Zones
Living Income
FARM SIZE
YIELD GAP
AGROECOLOGY
INCOME
SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION
author Giller, K.E.
Delaune, T.
Silva, J.V.
Wijk, M.T. van
Hammond, J.
Descheemaeker, K.
van de Ven, G.
Schut, A.G.T.
Taulya, G.
Chikowo, R.
Andersson, J.A.
author_facet Giller, K.E.
Delaune, T.
Silva, J.V.
Wijk, M.T. van
Hammond, J.
Descheemaeker, K.
van de Ven, G.
Schut, A.G.T.
Taulya, G.
Chikowo, R.
Andersson, J.A.
author_sort Giller, K.E.
title Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
title_short Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
title_full Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
title_fullStr Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
title_full_unstemmed Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
title_sort small farms and development in sub-saharan africa: farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
publisher Springer
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21714
work_keys_str_mv AT gillerke smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT delaunet smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT silvajv smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT wijkmtvan smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT hammondj smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT descheemaekerk smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT vandeveng smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT schutagt smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT taulyag smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT chikowor smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
AT anderssonja smallfarmsanddevelopmentinsubsaharanafricafarmingforfoodforincomeorforlackofbetteroptions
_version_ 1756087021247397888