Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage
To enable a scalable sparse testing genomic selection (GS) strategy at preliminary yield trials in the CIMMYT maize breeding program, optimal approaches to incorporate genotype by environment interaction (GEI) in genomic prediction models are explored. Two cross-validation schemes were evaluated: CV1, predicting the genetic merit of new bi-parental populations that have been evaluated in some environments and not others, and CV2, predicting the genetic merit of half of a bi-parental population that has been phenotyped in some environments and not others using the coefficient of determination (CDmean) to determine optimized subsets of a full-sib family to be evaluated in each environment. We report similar prediction accuracies in CV1 and CV2, however, CV2 has an intuitive appeal in that all bi-parental populations have representation across environments, allowing efficient use of information across environments. It is also ideal for building robust historical data because all individuals of a full-sib family have phenotypic data, albeit in different environments. Results show that grouping of environments according to similar growing/management conditions improved prediction accuracy and reduced computational requirements, providing a scalable, parsimonious approach to multi-environmental trials and GS in early testing stages. We further demonstrate that complementing the full-sib calibration set with optimized historical data results in improved prediction accuracy for the cross-validation schemes.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers
2021
|
Subjects: | AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, Genomic Selection, Preliminary Yield Trials, Prediction Accuracy, Unstructured Model, CDmean, MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION, FACTOR ANALYSIS, MODELS, |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21621 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cimmyt-10883-21621 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cimmyt-10883-216212023-12-14T14:29:54Z Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage Atanda, A.S. Olsen, M. Crossa, J. Burgueño, J. Rincent, R. Dzidzienyo, D. Beyene, Y. Gowda, M. Dreher, K.A. Prasanna, B.M. Tongoona, P. Danquah, E. Olaoye, G. Robbins, K. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Genomic Selection Preliminary Yield Trials Prediction Accuracy Unstructured Model CDmean MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION FACTOR ANALYSIS MODELS To enable a scalable sparse testing genomic selection (GS) strategy at preliminary yield trials in the CIMMYT maize breeding program, optimal approaches to incorporate genotype by environment interaction (GEI) in genomic prediction models are explored. Two cross-validation schemes were evaluated: CV1, predicting the genetic merit of new bi-parental populations that have been evaluated in some environments and not others, and CV2, predicting the genetic merit of half of a bi-parental population that has been phenotyped in some environments and not others using the coefficient of determination (CDmean) to determine optimized subsets of a full-sib family to be evaluated in each environment. We report similar prediction accuracies in CV1 and CV2, however, CV2 has an intuitive appeal in that all bi-parental populations have representation across environments, allowing efficient use of information across environments. It is also ideal for building robust historical data because all individuals of a full-sib family have phenotypic data, albeit in different environments. Results show that grouping of environments according to similar growing/management conditions improved prediction accuracy and reduced computational requirements, providing a scalable, parsimonious approach to multi-environmental trials and GS in early testing stages. We further demonstrate that complementing the full-sib calibration set with optimized historical data results in improved prediction accuracy for the cross-validation schemes. 2021-08-24T00:05:16Z 2021-08-24T00:05:16Z 2021 Article Published Version https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21621 10.3389/fpls.2021.658978 English https://figshare.com/collections/Scalable_Sparse_Testing_Genomic_Selection_Strategy_for_Early_Yield_Testing_Stage/5478072 CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose Open Access Switzerland Frontiers 12 1664-462X Frontiers in Plant Science 658978 |
institution |
CIMMYT |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
México |
countrycode |
MX |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cimmyt |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Norte |
libraryname |
CIMMYT Library |
language |
English |
topic |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Genomic Selection Preliminary Yield Trials Prediction Accuracy Unstructured Model CDmean MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION FACTOR ANALYSIS MODELS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Genomic Selection Preliminary Yield Trials Prediction Accuracy Unstructured Model CDmean MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION FACTOR ANALYSIS MODELS |
spellingShingle |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Genomic Selection Preliminary Yield Trials Prediction Accuracy Unstructured Model CDmean MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION FACTOR ANALYSIS MODELS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Genomic Selection Preliminary Yield Trials Prediction Accuracy Unstructured Model CDmean MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION FACTOR ANALYSIS MODELS Atanda, A.S. Olsen, M. Crossa, J. Burgueño, J. Rincent, R. Dzidzienyo, D. Beyene, Y. Gowda, M. Dreher, K.A. Prasanna, B.M. Tongoona, P. Danquah, E. Olaoye, G. Robbins, K. Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage |
description |
To enable a scalable sparse testing genomic selection (GS) strategy at preliminary yield trials in the CIMMYT maize breeding program, optimal approaches to incorporate genotype by environment interaction (GEI) in genomic prediction models are explored. Two cross-validation schemes were evaluated: CV1, predicting the genetic merit of new bi-parental populations that have been evaluated in some environments and not others, and CV2, predicting the genetic merit of half of a bi-parental population that has been phenotyped in some environments and not others using the coefficient of determination (CDmean) to determine optimized subsets of a full-sib family to be evaluated in each environment. We report similar prediction accuracies in CV1 and CV2, however, CV2 has an intuitive appeal in that all bi-parental populations have representation across environments, allowing efficient use of information across environments. It is also ideal for building robust historical data because all individuals of a full-sib family have phenotypic data, albeit in different environments. Results show that grouping of environments according to similar growing/management conditions improved prediction accuracy and reduced computational requirements, providing a scalable, parsimonious approach to multi-environmental trials and GS in early testing stages. We further demonstrate that complementing the full-sib calibration set with optimized historical data results in improved prediction accuracy for the cross-validation schemes. |
format |
Article |
topic_facet |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Genomic Selection Preliminary Yield Trials Prediction Accuracy Unstructured Model CDmean MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION FACTOR ANALYSIS MODELS |
author |
Atanda, A.S. Olsen, M. Crossa, J. Burgueño, J. Rincent, R. Dzidzienyo, D. Beyene, Y. Gowda, M. Dreher, K.A. Prasanna, B.M. Tongoona, P. Danquah, E. Olaoye, G. Robbins, K. |
author_facet |
Atanda, A.S. Olsen, M. Crossa, J. Burgueño, J. Rincent, R. Dzidzienyo, D. Beyene, Y. Gowda, M. Dreher, K.A. Prasanna, B.M. Tongoona, P. Danquah, E. Olaoye, G. Robbins, K. |
author_sort |
Atanda, A.S. |
title |
Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage |
title_short |
Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage |
title_full |
Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage |
title_fullStr |
Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage |
title_sort |
scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage |
publisher |
Frontiers |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21621 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT atandaas scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT olsenm scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT crossaj scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT burguenoj scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT rincentr scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT dzidzienyod scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT beyeney scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT gowdam scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT dreherka scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT prasannabm scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT tongoonap scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT danquahe scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT olaoyeg scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage AT robbinsk scalablesparsetestinggenomicselectionstrategyforearlyyieldtestingstage |
_version_ |
1787232996610277376 |