Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management

Understanding yield responses to nutrient application is a key input for extension advice and strategic agricultural investments in developing countries. A commonly used model for yield responses to nutrient inputs in tropical smallholder farming systems is QUEFTS (QUantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils). While QUEFTS has a strong conceptual foundation, a key assumption is that nutrients are the only limiting factors. One implication of this is the required assumption of ‘perfect management’. This may be problematic in the application of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with a wide variety of yield limiting factors. In a previous study, QUEFTS was calibrated using farm trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria. To reduce observed variability in correlations between estimated soil nutrient (N, P, K) supply and soil parameters (e.g. soil organic carbon, soil pH; step 1 of QUEFTS) a Mahalanobis distance method was used to remove data points not adhering to expected correlations. In this study, we assessed an alternative approach: can the QUEFTS model be adapted to fit smallholder farming systems and associated variation in management? Using 676 observations from the same nutrient omission trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria, we compare a standard linear regression approach with a quantile regression approach to calibrate QUEFTS. We find that under the standard linear regression approach, there is a poor relation between predicted and observed yields. Using quantile regression, however, QUEFTS performed better at predicting attainable yields – defined as the 90th percentile of observed yields – under a wide variety of production conditions. Our results indicate that using quantile regression as a way to predict attainable yields, is a useful alternative implementation of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with high variability in management and other characteristics.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ravensbergen, A.P.P., Chamberlin, J., Craufurd, P., Shehu, B.M., Hijbeek, R.
Format: Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
Subjects:AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, Fertilizer Response, Soil Nutrient Supply, Quantile Regression, QUEFTS, Smallholder Farming, FERTILIZERS, SOIL FERTILITY, MAIZE, SMALLHOLDERS,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21502
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cimmyt-10883-21502
record_format koha
spelling dig-cimmyt-10883-215022021-08-27T14:36:54Z Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management Ravensbergen, A.P.P. Chamberlin, J. Craufurd, P. Shehu, B.M. Hijbeek, R. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Fertilizer Response Soil Nutrient Supply Quantile Regression QUEFTS Smallholder Farming FERTILIZERS SOIL FERTILITY MAIZE SMALLHOLDERS Understanding yield responses to nutrient application is a key input for extension advice and strategic agricultural investments in developing countries. A commonly used model for yield responses to nutrient inputs in tropical smallholder farming systems is QUEFTS (QUantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils). While QUEFTS has a strong conceptual foundation, a key assumption is that nutrients are the only limiting factors. One implication of this is the required assumption of ‘perfect management’. This may be problematic in the application of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with a wide variety of yield limiting factors. In a previous study, QUEFTS was calibrated using farm trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria. To reduce observed variability in correlations between estimated soil nutrient (N, P, K) supply and soil parameters (e.g. soil organic carbon, soil pH; step 1 of QUEFTS) a Mahalanobis distance method was used to remove data points not adhering to expected correlations. In this study, we assessed an alternative approach: can the QUEFTS model be adapted to fit smallholder farming systems and associated variation in management? Using 676 observations from the same nutrient omission trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria, we compare a standard linear regression approach with a quantile regression approach to calibrate QUEFTS. We find that under the standard linear regression approach, there is a poor relation between predicted and observed yields. Using quantile regression, however, QUEFTS performed better at predicting attainable yields – defined as the 90th percentile of observed yields – under a wide variety of production conditions. Our results indicate that using quantile regression as a way to predict attainable yields, is a useful alternative implementation of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with high variability in management and other characteristics. 2021-05-12T00:15:11Z 2021-05-12T00:15:11Z 2021 Article Published Version https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21502 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108126 English CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose Open Access Amsterdam (Netherlands) Elsevier 266 0378-4290 Field Crops Research 108126
institution CIMMYT
collection DSpace
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cimmyt
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname CIMMYT Library
language English
topic AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Fertilizer Response
Soil Nutrient Supply
Quantile Regression
QUEFTS
Smallholder Farming
FERTILIZERS
SOIL FERTILITY
MAIZE
SMALLHOLDERS
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Fertilizer Response
Soil Nutrient Supply
Quantile Regression
QUEFTS
Smallholder Farming
FERTILIZERS
SOIL FERTILITY
MAIZE
SMALLHOLDERS
spellingShingle AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Fertilizer Response
Soil Nutrient Supply
Quantile Regression
QUEFTS
Smallholder Farming
FERTILIZERS
SOIL FERTILITY
MAIZE
SMALLHOLDERS
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Fertilizer Response
Soil Nutrient Supply
Quantile Regression
QUEFTS
Smallholder Farming
FERTILIZERS
SOIL FERTILITY
MAIZE
SMALLHOLDERS
Ravensbergen, A.P.P.
Chamberlin, J.
Craufurd, P.
Shehu, B.M.
Hijbeek, R.
Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management
description Understanding yield responses to nutrient application is a key input for extension advice and strategic agricultural investments in developing countries. A commonly used model for yield responses to nutrient inputs in tropical smallholder farming systems is QUEFTS (QUantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils). While QUEFTS has a strong conceptual foundation, a key assumption is that nutrients are the only limiting factors. One implication of this is the required assumption of ‘perfect management’. This may be problematic in the application of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with a wide variety of yield limiting factors. In a previous study, QUEFTS was calibrated using farm trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria. To reduce observed variability in correlations between estimated soil nutrient (N, P, K) supply and soil parameters (e.g. soil organic carbon, soil pH; step 1 of QUEFTS) a Mahalanobis distance method was used to remove data points not adhering to expected correlations. In this study, we assessed an alternative approach: can the QUEFTS model be adapted to fit smallholder farming systems and associated variation in management? Using 676 observations from the same nutrient omission trials in two major maize production zones in Nigeria, we compare a standard linear regression approach with a quantile regression approach to calibrate QUEFTS. We find that under the standard linear regression approach, there is a poor relation between predicted and observed yields. Using quantile regression, however, QUEFTS performed better at predicting attainable yields – defined as the 90th percentile of observed yields – under a wide variety of production conditions. Our results indicate that using quantile regression as a way to predict attainable yields, is a useful alternative implementation of QUEFTS in smallholder farming systems with high variability in management and other characteristics.
format Article
topic_facet AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Fertilizer Response
Soil Nutrient Supply
Quantile Regression
QUEFTS
Smallholder Farming
FERTILIZERS
SOIL FERTILITY
MAIZE
SMALLHOLDERS
author Ravensbergen, A.P.P.
Chamberlin, J.
Craufurd, P.
Shehu, B.M.
Hijbeek, R.
author_facet Ravensbergen, A.P.P.
Chamberlin, J.
Craufurd, P.
Shehu, B.M.
Hijbeek, R.
author_sort Ravensbergen, A.P.P.
title Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management
title_short Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management
title_full Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management
title_fullStr Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management
title_full_unstemmed Adapting the QUEFTS model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management
title_sort adapting the quefts model to predict attainable yields when training data are characterized by imperfect management
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10883/21502
work_keys_str_mv AT ravensbergenapp adaptingthequeftsmodeltopredictattainableyieldswhentrainingdataarecharacterizedbyimperfectmanagement
AT chamberlinj adaptingthequeftsmodeltopredictattainableyieldswhentrainingdataarecharacterizedbyimperfectmanagement
AT craufurdp adaptingthequeftsmodeltopredictattainableyieldswhentrainingdataarecharacterizedbyimperfectmanagement
AT shehubm adaptingthequeftsmodeltopredictattainableyieldswhentrainingdataarecharacterizedbyimperfectmanagement
AT hijbeekr adaptingthequeftsmodeltopredictattainableyieldswhentrainingdataarecharacterizedbyimperfectmanagement
_version_ 1756086993981276160