Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia
In multi-location experimental trials, test locations must be selected to properly discriminate between varieties and to be representative of the target regions. The objective of this study were to evaluate test locations in terms of discrimination ability, representativeness, and desirability, and to investigate the presence of mega-environments using AMMI and GGE models and to suggest representative environments for breeding and variety testing purposes. Among 19 maize varieties tested across 11 environments, mean grain yield ranged between 4.47 t/ha (BH545) to 7.49 t/ha (BH546). Both AMMI and GGE models identified G14 and G1 as desirable hybrids for cultivation because they combined stability and higher average yield. Nonetheless, as confirmed by GGE analysis BH546 was most closest to the ideal genotype hence, considered as best hybrid. Environment wise, E9 and E4 were the most stable and unstable test environments, respectively. The 11 test environments fell into three apparent mega-environments. E9 formed one group by its own, E1, E2, E3, E5, E6, E7, E8 and E11 formed the second group and E4 and E10 formed the third group. E3, E5 and, E7 were both discriminating and representative therefore are favorable environments for selecting generally adapted genotypes. E4, E9 and E10 were discriminating but non-representative test environments thus are useful for selecting specifically adapted genotypes. E8 and E11 were nondiscriminating test environments hence little information about the genotypes. The results of this study helped to identify mega-environments, also representativeness and discriminating power of test environments better visualized with the GGE bi-plot model.
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research
2018
|
Subjects: | AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, FIELD EXPERIMENTATION, PLANT BREEDING, VARIETY SCREENING, ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS, STATISTICAL METHODS, |
Online Access: | https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/view/176748/166129 https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19947 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cimmyt-10883-19947 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cimmyt-10883-199472024-03-13T16:34:38Z Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia Legesse Wolde Keno, T. Tadesse, B. Bogale, G. Chere, A.T. Abebe, B. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY FIELD EXPERIMENTATION PLANT BREEDING VARIETY SCREENING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STATISTICAL METHODS In multi-location experimental trials, test locations must be selected to properly discriminate between varieties and to be representative of the target regions. The objective of this study were to evaluate test locations in terms of discrimination ability, representativeness, and desirability, and to investigate the presence of mega-environments using AMMI and GGE models and to suggest representative environments for breeding and variety testing purposes. Among 19 maize varieties tested across 11 environments, mean grain yield ranged between 4.47 t/ha (BH545) to 7.49 t/ha (BH546). Both AMMI and GGE models identified G14 and G1 as desirable hybrids for cultivation because they combined stability and higher average yield. Nonetheless, as confirmed by GGE analysis BH546 was most closest to the ideal genotype hence, considered as best hybrid. Environment wise, E9 and E4 were the most stable and unstable test environments, respectively. The 11 test environments fell into three apparent mega-environments. E9 formed one group by its own, E1, E2, E3, E5, E6, E7, E8 and E11 formed the second group and E4 and E10 formed the third group. E3, E5 and, E7 were both discriminating and representative therefore are favorable environments for selecting generally adapted genotypes. E4, E9 and E10 were discriminating but non-representative test environments thus are useful for selecting specifically adapted genotypes. E8 and E11 were nondiscriminating test environments hence little information about the genotypes. The results of this study helped to identify mega-environments, also representativeness and discriminating power of test environments better visualized with the GGE bi-plot model. 65-84 2019-02-08T01:05:16Z 2019-02-08T01:05:16Z 2018 Article Published Version ISSN: 2415-2382 https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/view/176748/166129 https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19947 English CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose. Open Access PDF Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research 2 28 Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
institution |
CIMMYT |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
México |
countrycode |
MX |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cimmyt |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Norte |
libraryname |
CIMMYT Library |
language |
English |
topic |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY FIELD EXPERIMENTATION PLANT BREEDING VARIETY SCREENING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STATISTICAL METHODS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY FIELD EXPERIMENTATION PLANT BREEDING VARIETY SCREENING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STATISTICAL METHODS |
spellingShingle |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY FIELD EXPERIMENTATION PLANT BREEDING VARIETY SCREENING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STATISTICAL METHODS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY FIELD EXPERIMENTATION PLANT BREEDING VARIETY SCREENING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STATISTICAL METHODS Legesse Wolde Keno, T. Tadesse, B. Bogale, G. Chere, A.T. Abebe, B. Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia |
description |
In multi-location experimental trials, test locations must be selected to properly discriminate between varieties and to be representative of the target regions. The objective of this study were to evaluate test locations in terms of discrimination ability, representativeness, and desirability, and to investigate the presence of mega-environments using AMMI and GGE models and to suggest representative environments for breeding and variety testing purposes. Among 19 maize varieties tested across 11 environments, mean grain yield ranged between 4.47 t/ha (BH545) to 7.49 t/ha (BH546). Both AMMI and GGE models identified G14 and G1 as desirable hybrids for cultivation because they combined stability and higher average yield. Nonetheless, as confirmed by GGE analysis BH546 was most closest to the ideal genotype hence, considered as best hybrid. Environment wise, E9 and E4 were the most stable and unstable test environments, respectively. The 11 test environments fell into three apparent mega-environments. E9 formed one group by its own, E1, E2, E3, E5, E6, E7, E8 and E11 formed the second group and E4 and E10 formed the third group. E3, E5 and, E7 were both discriminating and representative therefore are favorable environments for selecting generally adapted genotypes. E4, E9 and E10 were discriminating but non-representative test environments thus are useful for selecting specifically adapted genotypes. E8 and E11 were nondiscriminating test environments hence little information about the genotypes. The results of this study helped to identify mega-environments, also representativeness and discriminating power of test environments better visualized with the GGE bi-plot model. |
format |
Article |
topic_facet |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY FIELD EXPERIMENTATION PLANT BREEDING VARIETY SCREENING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STATISTICAL METHODS |
author |
Legesse Wolde Keno, T. Tadesse, B. Bogale, G. Chere, A.T. Abebe, B. |
author_facet |
Legesse Wolde Keno, T. Tadesse, B. Bogale, G. Chere, A.T. Abebe, B. |
author_sort |
Legesse Wolde |
title |
Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia |
title_short |
Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia |
title_full |
Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia |
title_fullStr |
Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia |
title_sort |
mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using ammi and gge bi-plot analysis in ethiopia |
publisher |
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/view/176748/166129 https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19947 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT legessewolde megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia AT kenot megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia AT tadesseb megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia AT bogaleg megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia AT chereat megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia AT abebeb megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia |
_version_ |
1794797624834916352 |