Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia

In multi-location experimental trials, test locations must be selected to properly discriminate between varieties and to be representative of the target regions. The objective of this study were to evaluate test locations in terms of discrimination ability, representativeness, and desirability, and to investigate the presence of mega-environments using AMMI and GGE models and to suggest representative environments for breeding and variety testing purposes. Among 19 maize varieties tested across 11 environments, mean grain yield ranged between 4.47 t/ha (BH545) to 7.49 t/ha (BH546). Both AMMI and GGE models identified G14 and G1 as desirable hybrids for cultivation because they combined stability and higher average yield. Nonetheless, as confirmed by GGE analysis BH546 was most closest to the ideal genotype hence, considered as best hybrid. Environment wise, E9 and E4 were the most stable and unstable test environments, respectively. The 11 test environments fell into three apparent mega-environments. E9 formed one group by its own, E1, E2, E3, E5, E6, E7, E8 and E11 formed the second group and E4 and E10 formed the third group. E3, E5 and, E7 were both discriminating and representative therefore are favorable environments for selecting generally adapted genotypes. E4, E9 and E10 were discriminating but non-representative test environments thus are useful for selecting specifically adapted genotypes. E8 and E11 were nondiscriminating test environments hence little information about the genotypes. The results of this study helped to identify mega-environments, also representativeness and discriminating power of test environments better visualized with the GGE bi-plot model.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Legesse Wolde, Keno, T., Tadesse, B., Bogale, G., Chere, A.T., Abebe, B.
Format: Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research 2018
Subjects:AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, FIELD EXPERIMENTATION, PLANT BREEDING, VARIETY SCREENING, ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS, STATISTICAL METHODS,
Online Access:https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/view/176748/166129
https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19947
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cimmyt-10883-19947
record_format koha
spelling dig-cimmyt-10883-199472024-03-13T16:34:38Z Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia Legesse Wolde Keno, T. Tadesse, B. Bogale, G. Chere, A.T. Abebe, B. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY FIELD EXPERIMENTATION PLANT BREEDING VARIETY SCREENING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS STATISTICAL METHODS In multi-location experimental trials, test locations must be selected to properly discriminate between varieties and to be representative of the target regions. The objective of this study were to evaluate test locations in terms of discrimination ability, representativeness, and desirability, and to investigate the presence of mega-environments using AMMI and GGE models and to suggest representative environments for breeding and variety testing purposes. Among 19 maize varieties tested across 11 environments, mean grain yield ranged between 4.47 t/ha (BH545) to 7.49 t/ha (BH546). Both AMMI and GGE models identified G14 and G1 as desirable hybrids for cultivation because they combined stability and higher average yield. Nonetheless, as confirmed by GGE analysis BH546 was most closest to the ideal genotype hence, considered as best hybrid. Environment wise, E9 and E4 were the most stable and unstable test environments, respectively. The 11 test environments fell into three apparent mega-environments. E9 formed one group by its own, E1, E2, E3, E5, E6, E7, E8 and E11 formed the second group and E4 and E10 formed the third group. E3, E5 and, E7 were both discriminating and representative therefore are favorable environments for selecting generally adapted genotypes. E4, E9 and E10 were discriminating but non-representative test environments thus are useful for selecting specifically adapted genotypes. E8 and E11 were nondiscriminating test environments hence little information about the genotypes. The results of this study helped to identify mega-environments, also representativeness and discriminating power of test environments better visualized with the GGE bi-plot model. 65-84 2019-02-08T01:05:16Z 2019-02-08T01:05:16Z 2018 Article Published Version ISSN: 2415-2382 https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/view/176748/166129 https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19947 English CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose. Open Access PDF Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research 2 28 Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
institution CIMMYT
collection DSpace
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cimmyt
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname CIMMYT Library
language English
topic AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
FIELD EXPERIMENTATION
PLANT BREEDING
VARIETY SCREENING
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
STATISTICAL METHODS
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
FIELD EXPERIMENTATION
PLANT BREEDING
VARIETY SCREENING
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
STATISTICAL METHODS
spellingShingle AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
FIELD EXPERIMENTATION
PLANT BREEDING
VARIETY SCREENING
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
STATISTICAL METHODS
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
FIELD EXPERIMENTATION
PLANT BREEDING
VARIETY SCREENING
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
STATISTICAL METHODS
Legesse Wolde
Keno, T.
Tadesse, B.
Bogale, G.
Chere, A.T.
Abebe, B.
Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia
description In multi-location experimental trials, test locations must be selected to properly discriminate between varieties and to be representative of the target regions. The objective of this study were to evaluate test locations in terms of discrimination ability, representativeness, and desirability, and to investigate the presence of mega-environments using AMMI and GGE models and to suggest representative environments for breeding and variety testing purposes. Among 19 maize varieties tested across 11 environments, mean grain yield ranged between 4.47 t/ha (BH545) to 7.49 t/ha (BH546). Both AMMI and GGE models identified G14 and G1 as desirable hybrids for cultivation because they combined stability and higher average yield. Nonetheless, as confirmed by GGE analysis BH546 was most closest to the ideal genotype hence, considered as best hybrid. Environment wise, E9 and E4 were the most stable and unstable test environments, respectively. The 11 test environments fell into three apparent mega-environments. E9 formed one group by its own, E1, E2, E3, E5, E6, E7, E8 and E11 formed the second group and E4 and E10 formed the third group. E3, E5 and, E7 were both discriminating and representative therefore are favorable environments for selecting generally adapted genotypes. E4, E9 and E10 were discriminating but non-representative test environments thus are useful for selecting specifically adapted genotypes. E8 and E11 were nondiscriminating test environments hence little information about the genotypes. The results of this study helped to identify mega-environments, also representativeness and discriminating power of test environments better visualized with the GGE bi-plot model.
format Article
topic_facet AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
FIELD EXPERIMENTATION
PLANT BREEDING
VARIETY SCREENING
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
STATISTICAL METHODS
author Legesse Wolde
Keno, T.
Tadesse, B.
Bogale, G.
Chere, A.T.
Abebe, B.
author_facet Legesse Wolde
Keno, T.
Tadesse, B.
Bogale, G.
Chere, A.T.
Abebe, B.
author_sort Legesse Wolde
title Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia
title_short Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia
title_full Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using Ammi and GGE bi-plot analysis in Ethiopia
title_sort mega-environment targeting of maize varieties using ammi and gge bi-plot analysis in ethiopia
publisher Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research
publishDate 2018
url https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/view/176748/166129
https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19947
work_keys_str_mv AT legessewolde megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia
AT kenot megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia
AT tadesseb megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia
AT bogaleg megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia
AT chereat megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia
AT abebeb megaenvironmenttargetingofmaizevarietiesusingammiandggebiplotanalysisinethiopia
_version_ 1794797624834916352