A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems

The expansion of agriculture has resulted in large-scale habitat loss, the fragmentation of forests, significant losses in biological diversity and negative impacts on many ecosystem services. In this paper, we highlight the Agrarian Change Project, a multi-disciplinary research initiative, that applies detailed socio-ecological methodologies in multi-functional landscapes, and assess the subsequent implications for conservation, livelihoods and food security. Specifically, the research focuses on land use impacts in locations which exhibit various combinations of agricultural modification/change across a forest transition gradient in six tropical landscapes, in Zambia, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Bangladesh. These methods include integrated assessments of the perceptions of ecosystem service provision, tree cover loss and gain, relative poverty, diets and agricultural patterns of change. Although numerous surveys on rural livelihoods are undertaken each year, often at great cost, many are hampered by weaknesses in methods and thus may not reflect rural realities. We attempt to highlight how integrating broader socio-ecological methods can be used to fill in those gaps and ensure such realities are indeed captured. Early findings suggest that the transition from a forested landscape to a more agrarian dominated system does not necessarily result in better livelihood outcomes and there may be unintended consequences of forest and tree cover removal. These include the loss of access to grazing land, loss of dietary diversity and the loss of ecosystem services/forest products.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunderland, T., Abdoulaye, R., Ahammad, R., Asaha, S., Baudron, F., Deakin, E., Duriaux, J., Eddy, I., Foli, S., Gumbo, D., Khatun, K., Kondwani, M, Kshatriya, M., Leonald, L., Rowland, D., Stacey, N., Tomscha, S., Yang, K., Gergel, S., Vianen, J. V.
Format: Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, Agrarian Change, AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, FORESTS, LIVELIHOODS, POVERTY, BIODIVERSITY,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10883/19077
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cimmyt-10883-19077
record_format koha
spelling dig-cimmyt-10883-190772021-08-05T18:02:34Z A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems Sunderland, T. Abdoulaye, R. Ahammad, R. Asaha, S. Baudron, F. Deakin, E. Duriaux, J. Eddy, I. Foli, S. Gumbo, D. Khatun, K. Kondwani, M Kshatriya, M. Leonald, L. Rowland, D. Stacey, N. Tomscha, S. Yang, K. Gergel, S. Vianen, J. V. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Agrarian Change AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT FORESTS LIVELIHOODS POVERTY BIODIVERSITY The expansion of agriculture has resulted in large-scale habitat loss, the fragmentation of forests, significant losses in biological diversity and negative impacts on many ecosystem services. In this paper, we highlight the Agrarian Change Project, a multi-disciplinary research initiative, that applies detailed socio-ecological methodologies in multi-functional landscapes, and assess the subsequent implications for conservation, livelihoods and food security. Specifically, the research focuses on land use impacts in locations which exhibit various combinations of agricultural modification/change across a forest transition gradient in six tropical landscapes, in Zambia, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Bangladesh. These methods include integrated assessments of the perceptions of ecosystem service provision, tree cover loss and gain, relative poverty, diets and agricultural patterns of change. Although numerous surveys on rural livelihoods are undertaken each year, often at great cost, many are hampered by weaknesses in methods and thus may not reflect rural realities. We attempt to highlight how integrating broader socio-ecological methods can be used to fill in those gaps and ensure such realities are indeed captured. Early findings suggest that the transition from a forested landscape to a more agrarian dominated system does not necessarily result in better livelihood outcomes and there may be unintended consequences of forest and tree cover removal. These include the loss of access to grazing land, loss of dietary diversity and the loss of ecosystem services/forest products. 83-91 2017-11-24T16:15:29Z 2017-11-24T16:15:29Z 2017 Article 1389-9341 http://hdl.handle.net/10883/19077 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.013 English CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose. Open Access PDF Amsterdam, Netherlands Elsevier 84 Forest Policy and Economics
institution CIMMYT
collection DSpace
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cimmyt
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname CIMMYT Library
language English
topic AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agrarian Change
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
FORESTS
LIVELIHOODS
POVERTY
BIODIVERSITY
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agrarian Change
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
FORESTS
LIVELIHOODS
POVERTY
BIODIVERSITY
spellingShingle AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agrarian Change
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
FORESTS
LIVELIHOODS
POVERTY
BIODIVERSITY
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agrarian Change
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
FORESTS
LIVELIHOODS
POVERTY
BIODIVERSITY
Sunderland, T.
Abdoulaye, R.
Ahammad, R.
Asaha, S.
Baudron, F.
Deakin, E.
Duriaux, J.
Eddy, I.
Foli, S.
Gumbo, D.
Khatun, K.
Kondwani, M
Kshatriya, M.
Leonald, L.
Rowland, D.
Stacey, N.
Tomscha, S.
Yang, K.
Gergel, S.
Vianen, J. V.
A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems
description The expansion of agriculture has resulted in large-scale habitat loss, the fragmentation of forests, significant losses in biological diversity and negative impacts on many ecosystem services. In this paper, we highlight the Agrarian Change Project, a multi-disciplinary research initiative, that applies detailed socio-ecological methodologies in multi-functional landscapes, and assess the subsequent implications for conservation, livelihoods and food security. Specifically, the research focuses on land use impacts in locations which exhibit various combinations of agricultural modification/change across a forest transition gradient in six tropical landscapes, in Zambia, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Bangladesh. These methods include integrated assessments of the perceptions of ecosystem service provision, tree cover loss and gain, relative poverty, diets and agricultural patterns of change. Although numerous surveys on rural livelihoods are undertaken each year, often at great cost, many are hampered by weaknesses in methods and thus may not reflect rural realities. We attempt to highlight how integrating broader socio-ecological methods can be used to fill in those gaps and ensure such realities are indeed captured. Early findings suggest that the transition from a forested landscape to a more agrarian dominated system does not necessarily result in better livelihood outcomes and there may be unintended consequences of forest and tree cover removal. These include the loss of access to grazing land, loss of dietary diversity and the loss of ecosystem services/forest products.
format Article
topic_facet AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Agrarian Change
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
FORESTS
LIVELIHOODS
POVERTY
BIODIVERSITY
author Sunderland, T.
Abdoulaye, R.
Ahammad, R.
Asaha, S.
Baudron, F.
Deakin, E.
Duriaux, J.
Eddy, I.
Foli, S.
Gumbo, D.
Khatun, K.
Kondwani, M
Kshatriya, M.
Leonald, L.
Rowland, D.
Stacey, N.
Tomscha, S.
Yang, K.
Gergel, S.
Vianen, J. V.
author_facet Sunderland, T.
Abdoulaye, R.
Ahammad, R.
Asaha, S.
Baudron, F.
Deakin, E.
Duriaux, J.
Eddy, I.
Foli, S.
Gumbo, D.
Khatun, K.
Kondwani, M
Kshatriya, M.
Leonald, L.
Rowland, D.
Stacey, N.
Tomscha, S.
Yang, K.
Gergel, S.
Vianen, J. V.
author_sort Sunderland, T.
title A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems
title_short A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems
title_full A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems
title_fullStr A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems
title_full_unstemmed A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems
title_sort methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10883/19077
work_keys_str_mv AT sunderlandt amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT abdoulayer amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT ahammadr amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT asahas amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT baudronf amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT deakine amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT duriauxj amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT eddyi amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT folis amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT gumbod amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT khatunk amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT kondwanim amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT kshatriyam amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT leonaldl amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT rowlandd amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT staceyn amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT tomschas amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT yangk amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT gergels amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT vianenjv amethodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT sunderlandt methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT abdoulayer methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT ahammadr methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT asahas methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT baudronf methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT deakine methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT duriauxj methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT eddyi methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT folis methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT gumbod methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT khatunk methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT kondwanim methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT kshatriyam methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT leonaldl methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT rowlandd methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT staceyn methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT tomschas methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT yangk methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT gergels methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
AT vianenjv methodologicalapproachforassessingcrosssitelandscapechangeunderstandingsocioecologicalsystems
_version_ 1756086688584564736