Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems

This paper discusses the sustainability of livestock systems, emphasising bidirectional relations with animal health. We review conventional and contrarian thinking on sustainability and argue that in the most common approaches to understanding sustainability, health aspects have been under-examined. Literature review reveals deep concerns over the sustainability of livestock systems; we recognise that interventions are required to shift to more sustainable trajectories, and explore approaches to prioritising in different systems, focusing on interventions that lead to better health. A previously proposed three-tiered categorisation of ‘hot spots’, ‘cold spots’ and ‘worried well’ animal health trajectories provides a mental model that, by taking into consideration the different animal health status, animal health risks, service response needs and key drivers in each system, can help identify and implement interventions. Combining sustainability concepts with animal health trajectories allows for a richer analysis, and we apply this to three case studies drawn from North Africa and the Middle East; Bangladesh; and the Eastern Cape of South Africa. We conclude that the quest for sustainability of livestock production systems from the perspective of human and animal health is elusive and difficult to reconcile with the massive anticipated growth in demand for livestock products, mainly in low- and middle-income countries, as well as the aspirations of poor livestock keepers for better lives. Nevertheless, improving the health of livestock can contribute to health sustainability both through reducing negative health impacts of livestock and increasing efficiency of production. However, the choice of the most appropriate options must be under-pinned by an understanding of agroecology, economy and values. We argue that a new pillar of One Health should be added to the three traditional sustainability pillars of economics, society and environment when addressing livestock systems.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Perry, Brian D., Robinson, Timothy P., Grace, Delia
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018
Subjects:animal health, livestock,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92401
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000630
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-92401
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-924012023-12-08T19:36:04Z Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems Perry, Brian D. Robinson, Timothy P. Grace, Delia animal health livestock This paper discusses the sustainability of livestock systems, emphasising bidirectional relations with animal health. We review conventional and contrarian thinking on sustainability and argue that in the most common approaches to understanding sustainability, health aspects have been under-examined. Literature review reveals deep concerns over the sustainability of livestock systems; we recognise that interventions are required to shift to more sustainable trajectories, and explore approaches to prioritising in different systems, focusing on interventions that lead to better health. A previously proposed three-tiered categorisation of ‘hot spots’, ‘cold spots’ and ‘worried well’ animal health trajectories provides a mental model that, by taking into consideration the different animal health status, animal health risks, service response needs and key drivers in each system, can help identify and implement interventions. Combining sustainability concepts with animal health trajectories allows for a richer analysis, and we apply this to three case studies drawn from North Africa and the Middle East; Bangladesh; and the Eastern Cape of South Africa. We conclude that the quest for sustainability of livestock production systems from the perspective of human and animal health is elusive and difficult to reconcile with the massive anticipated growth in demand for livestock products, mainly in low- and middle-income countries, as well as the aspirations of poor livestock keepers for better lives. Nevertheless, improving the health of livestock can contribute to health sustainability both through reducing negative health impacts of livestock and increasing efficiency of production. However, the choice of the most appropriate options must be under-pinned by an understanding of agroecology, economy and values. We argue that a new pillar of One Health should be added to the three traditional sustainability pillars of economics, society and environment when addressing livestock systems. 2018 2018-04-27T07:40:26Z 2018-04-27T07:40:26Z Journal Article Perry, B.D., Robinson, T.P. and Grace, D. 2018. Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems. Animal 12(8): 1699–1708. 1751-7311 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92401 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000630 en CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 Open Access p. 1699-1708 Elsevier Animal
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic animal health
livestock
animal health
livestock
spellingShingle animal health
livestock
animal health
livestock
Perry, Brian D.
Robinson, Timothy P.
Grace, Delia
Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems
description This paper discusses the sustainability of livestock systems, emphasising bidirectional relations with animal health. We review conventional and contrarian thinking on sustainability and argue that in the most common approaches to understanding sustainability, health aspects have been under-examined. Literature review reveals deep concerns over the sustainability of livestock systems; we recognise that interventions are required to shift to more sustainable trajectories, and explore approaches to prioritising in different systems, focusing on interventions that lead to better health. A previously proposed three-tiered categorisation of ‘hot spots’, ‘cold spots’ and ‘worried well’ animal health trajectories provides a mental model that, by taking into consideration the different animal health status, animal health risks, service response needs and key drivers in each system, can help identify and implement interventions. Combining sustainability concepts with animal health trajectories allows for a richer analysis, and we apply this to three case studies drawn from North Africa and the Middle East; Bangladesh; and the Eastern Cape of South Africa. We conclude that the quest for sustainability of livestock production systems from the perspective of human and animal health is elusive and difficult to reconcile with the massive anticipated growth in demand for livestock products, mainly in low- and middle-income countries, as well as the aspirations of poor livestock keepers for better lives. Nevertheless, improving the health of livestock can contribute to health sustainability both through reducing negative health impacts of livestock and increasing efficiency of production. However, the choice of the most appropriate options must be under-pinned by an understanding of agroecology, economy and values. We argue that a new pillar of One Health should be added to the three traditional sustainability pillars of economics, society and environment when addressing livestock systems.
format Journal Article
topic_facet animal health
livestock
author Perry, Brian D.
Robinson, Timothy P.
Grace, Delia
author_facet Perry, Brian D.
Robinson, Timothy P.
Grace, Delia
author_sort Perry, Brian D.
title Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems
title_short Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems
title_full Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems
title_fullStr Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems
title_full_unstemmed Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems
title_sort review: animal health and sustainable global livestock systems
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2018
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92401
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000630
work_keys_str_mv AT perrybriand reviewanimalhealthandsustainablegloballivestocksystems
AT robinsontimothyp reviewanimalhealthandsustainablegloballivestocksystems
AT gracedelia reviewanimalhealthandsustainablegloballivestocksystems
_version_ 1787231106695692288