Contening cultures amongst development actors

Lewis et al (2003) establish a cogent argument which suggests that serious analysis of the culture of aid organizations, and of the relationships with other actors, matters, and that it is a neglected area of analysis. Their discussion raises important new questions about the development enterprise from an internal perspective that heretofore has been neglected or ignored. Contrasting the article by Lewis et al. with a book by Harrison and Huntington (2000) reinforces that conviction. Throughout the Harrison and Huntington book-- whose authors provide an excellent overview of the history of the study of culture as something that certainly does ‘matter’ in development--we kept saying to ourselves that ‘All this is fine, but it is focussed (as is much of the ancillary literature on ‘culture’ in development) on looking outward, at others undergoing development, without consideration of the development agency actors themselves. It mostly addresses questions and issues concerning the question: Why some political and national systems succeed and others fail.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Messerschmidt, Don, Gurung, Barun, Biggs, Stephen D.
Format: Book Chapter biblioteca
Language:English
Published: International Development Research Centre 2004
Subjects:participatory approaches, agricultural development, gender,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75681
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-75681
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-756812020-10-21T11:22:54Z Contening cultures amongst development actors Messerschmidt, Don Gurung, Barun Biggs, Stephen D. participatory approaches agricultural development gender Lewis et al (2003) establish a cogent argument which suggests that serious analysis of the culture of aid organizations, and of the relationships with other actors, matters, and that it is a neglected area of analysis. Their discussion raises important new questions about the development enterprise from an internal perspective that heretofore has been neglected or ignored. Contrasting the article by Lewis et al. with a book by Harrison and Huntington (2000) reinforces that conviction. Throughout the Harrison and Huntington book-- whose authors provide an excellent overview of the history of the study of culture as something that certainly does ‘matter’ in development--we kept saying to ourselves that ‘All this is fine, but it is focussed (as is much of the ancillary literature on ‘culture’ in development) on looking outward, at others undergoing development, without consideration of the development agency actors themselves. It mostly addresses questions and issues concerning the question: Why some political and national systems succeed and others fail. 2004 2016-06-10T00:24:49Z 2016-06-10T00:24:49Z Book Chapter Biggs, Stephen; Messerschmidt, Don; Gurung, Barun. 2004. Contending cultures amongst development actors. In Participatory research and development for sustainable agriculture and natural resource management: a sourcebook. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75681 en Open Access 126-132 application/pdf International Development Research Centre
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic participatory approaches
agricultural development
gender
participatory approaches
agricultural development
gender
spellingShingle participatory approaches
agricultural development
gender
participatory approaches
agricultural development
gender
Messerschmidt, Don
Gurung, Barun
Biggs, Stephen D.
Contening cultures amongst development actors
description Lewis et al (2003) establish a cogent argument which suggests that serious analysis of the culture of aid organizations, and of the relationships with other actors, matters, and that it is a neglected area of analysis. Their discussion raises important new questions about the development enterprise from an internal perspective that heretofore has been neglected or ignored. Contrasting the article by Lewis et al. with a book by Harrison and Huntington (2000) reinforces that conviction. Throughout the Harrison and Huntington book-- whose authors provide an excellent overview of the history of the study of culture as something that certainly does ‘matter’ in development--we kept saying to ourselves that ‘All this is fine, but it is focussed (as is much of the ancillary literature on ‘culture’ in development) on looking outward, at others undergoing development, without consideration of the development agency actors themselves. It mostly addresses questions and issues concerning the question: Why some political and national systems succeed and others fail.
format Book Chapter
topic_facet participatory approaches
agricultural development
gender
author Messerschmidt, Don
Gurung, Barun
Biggs, Stephen D.
author_facet Messerschmidt, Don
Gurung, Barun
Biggs, Stephen D.
author_sort Messerschmidt, Don
title Contening cultures amongst development actors
title_short Contening cultures amongst development actors
title_full Contening cultures amongst development actors
title_fullStr Contening cultures amongst development actors
title_full_unstemmed Contening cultures amongst development actors
title_sort contening cultures amongst development actors
publisher International Development Research Centre
publishDate 2004
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75681
work_keys_str_mv AT messerschmidtdon conteningculturesamongstdevelopmentactors
AT gurungbarun conteningculturesamongstdevelopmentactors
AT biggsstephend conteningculturesamongstdevelopmentactors
_version_ 1779053216324911104