Contening cultures amongst development actors
Lewis et al (2003) establish a cogent argument which suggests that serious analysis of the culture of aid organizations, and of the relationships with other actors, matters, and that it is a neglected area of analysis. Their discussion raises important new questions about the development enterprise from an internal perspective that heretofore has been neglected or ignored. Contrasting the article by Lewis et al. with a book by Harrison and Huntington (2000) reinforces that conviction. Throughout the Harrison and Huntington book-- whose authors provide an excellent overview of the history of the study of culture as something that certainly does ‘matter’ in development--we kept saying to ourselves that ‘All this is fine, but it is focussed (as is much of the ancillary literature on ‘culture’ in development) on looking outward, at others undergoing development, without consideration of the development agency actors themselves. It mostly addresses questions and issues concerning the question: Why some political and national systems succeed and others fail.
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book Chapter biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Development Research Centre
2004
|
Subjects: | participatory approaches, agricultural development, gender, |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75681 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cgspace-10568-75681 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cgspace-10568-756812020-10-21T11:22:54Z Contening cultures amongst development actors Messerschmidt, Don Gurung, Barun Biggs, Stephen D. participatory approaches agricultural development gender Lewis et al (2003) establish a cogent argument which suggests that serious analysis of the culture of aid organizations, and of the relationships with other actors, matters, and that it is a neglected area of analysis. Their discussion raises important new questions about the development enterprise from an internal perspective that heretofore has been neglected or ignored. Contrasting the article by Lewis et al. with a book by Harrison and Huntington (2000) reinforces that conviction. Throughout the Harrison and Huntington book-- whose authors provide an excellent overview of the history of the study of culture as something that certainly does ‘matter’ in development--we kept saying to ourselves that ‘All this is fine, but it is focussed (as is much of the ancillary literature on ‘culture’ in development) on looking outward, at others undergoing development, without consideration of the development agency actors themselves. It mostly addresses questions and issues concerning the question: Why some political and national systems succeed and others fail. 2004 2016-06-10T00:24:49Z 2016-06-10T00:24:49Z Book Chapter Biggs, Stephen; Messerschmidt, Don; Gurung, Barun. 2004. Contending cultures amongst development actors. In Participatory research and development for sustainable agriculture and natural resource management: a sourcebook. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75681 en Open Access 126-132 application/pdf International Development Research Centre |
institution |
CGIAR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cgspace |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CGIAR |
language |
English |
topic |
participatory approaches agricultural development gender participatory approaches agricultural development gender |
spellingShingle |
participatory approaches agricultural development gender participatory approaches agricultural development gender Messerschmidt, Don Gurung, Barun Biggs, Stephen D. Contening cultures amongst development actors |
description |
Lewis et al (2003) establish a cogent argument
which suggests that serious analysis of the
culture of aid organizations, and of the
relationships with other actors, matters,
and that it is a neglected area of analysis.
Their discussion raises important new questions
about the development enterprise from an internal
perspective that heretofore has been neglected or
ignored. Contrasting the article by Lewis et al.
with a book by Harrison and Huntington (2000)
reinforces that conviction. Throughout the Harrison and Huntington book--
whose authors provide an excellent overview of the history of the study of
culture as something that certainly does ‘matter’ in development--we kept saying
to ourselves that ‘All this is fine, but it is focussed (as is much of the ancillary
literature on ‘culture’ in development) on looking
outward, at others undergoing development,
without consideration of the development agency
actors themselves. It mostly addresses questions and
issues concerning the question: Why some political
and national systems succeed and others fail. |
format |
Book Chapter |
topic_facet |
participatory approaches agricultural development gender |
author |
Messerschmidt, Don Gurung, Barun Biggs, Stephen D. |
author_facet |
Messerschmidt, Don Gurung, Barun Biggs, Stephen D. |
author_sort |
Messerschmidt, Don |
title |
Contening cultures amongst development actors |
title_short |
Contening cultures amongst development actors |
title_full |
Contening cultures amongst development actors |
title_fullStr |
Contening cultures amongst development actors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contening cultures amongst development actors |
title_sort |
contening cultures amongst development actors |
publisher |
International Development Research Centre |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75681 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT messerschmidtdon conteningculturesamongstdevelopmentactors AT gurungbarun conteningculturesamongstdevelopmentactors AT biggsstephend conteningculturesamongstdevelopmentactors |
_version_ |
1779053216324911104 |