The importance of geographical indications to the EU
A memorandum outlining the significance of geographical designations to EU exporters was released by the European Commission on July 30th 2003. It pointed out that '85% of French wine exports use GIs' and '80% of EU exported spirits use GIs', and noted that French cheeses with a geographical designation are sold at a premium of €2 while Italian 'Toscano' oil has been sold at a premium of 20% since it was registered as a GI in 1998. GIs are seen as a 'unique asset' in an increasingly liberalised world. This forms part of a growing emphasis on the EU competing internationally on quality. However this requires international protection of those marks which constitute a designation of quality. The memorandum notes that a number of developing countries (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Kenya, Jamaica) also have an interest in GIs, and argues that GIs are about free trade, not protectionism. The EU's aim at the WTO is to: establish a multilateral register for geographical indications (TRIPS), operated in a simple and cost effective way; extend geographical indication protection to other products (TRIPS) such as rice, tea, cheese, ham; ensure market access for EU GI products (Committee on Agriculture) where restrictions currently exist. The EU currently has registered some 4,800 geographical indications (4,200 of them for wines and spirits). The memorandum outlines the economic and employment impact of GIs in different EU regions. The case of Spain is illustrative: in 1991 exports of GI products amounted to € 443 million by 1999 they exceeded € 1 billion. The Commission maintains that GIs create a 'genuine niche for the development of agri-food industries for relatively low development agricultural economies'. Comment: The issue of GIs is certainly of importance to a number of ACP countries in terms of the protection it could give to particularly highly regarded product varieties, but it also carries certain risks for a number of ACP countries, most notably those that have developed local industries replicating particular speciality products (e.g. Namibian hams and spirits based on German speciality products). Restructuring assistance may well be needed in these industries in order to develop new marketing strategies and brand recognition for products which will no longer be able to use the 'traditional' terms.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | News Item biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
2003
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52628 http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/September-2003 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cgspace-10568-52628 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cgspace-10568-526282022-11-29T17:48:00Z The importance of geographical indications to the EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation A memorandum outlining the significance of geographical designations to EU exporters was released by the European Commission on July 30th 2003. It pointed out that '85% of French wine exports use GIs' and '80% of EU exported spirits use GIs', and noted that French cheeses with a geographical designation are sold at a premium of €2 while Italian 'Toscano' oil has been sold at a premium of 20% since it was registered as a GI in 1998. GIs are seen as a 'unique asset' in an increasingly liberalised world. This forms part of a growing emphasis on the EU competing internationally on quality. However this requires international protection of those marks which constitute a designation of quality. The memorandum notes that a number of developing countries (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Kenya, Jamaica) also have an interest in GIs, and argues that GIs are about free trade, not protectionism. The EU's aim at the WTO is to: establish a multilateral register for geographical indications (TRIPS), operated in a simple and cost effective way; extend geographical indication protection to other products (TRIPS) such as rice, tea, cheese, ham; ensure market access for EU GI products (Committee on Agriculture) where restrictions currently exist. The EU currently has registered some 4,800 geographical indications (4,200 of them for wines and spirits). The memorandum outlines the economic and employment impact of GIs in different EU regions. The case of Spain is illustrative: in 1991 exports of GI products amounted to € 443 million by 1999 they exceeded € 1 billion. The Commission maintains that GIs create a 'genuine niche for the development of agri-food industries for relatively low development agricultural economies'. Comment: The issue of GIs is certainly of importance to a number of ACP countries in terms of the protection it could give to particularly highly regarded product varieties, but it also carries certain risks for a number of ACP countries, most notably those that have developed local industries replicating particular speciality products (e.g. Namibian hams and spirits based on German speciality products). Restructuring assistance may well be needed in these industries in order to develop new marketing strategies and brand recognition for products which will no longer be able to use the 'traditional' terms. A memorandum outlining the significance of... 2003 2015-01-09T14:07:55Z 2015-01-09T14:07:55Z News Item CTA. 2003. The importance of geographical indications to the EU. Agritrade, September 2003. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52628 http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/September-2003 en Agritrade Open Access Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation Agritrade |
institution |
CGIAR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cgspace |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CGIAR |
language |
English |
description |
A memorandum outlining the significance
of geographical designations to EU exporters was released by the
European Commission on July 30th 2003. It pointed out that '85%
of French wine exports use GIs' and '80% of EU exported spirits
use GIs', and noted that French cheeses with a geographical designation
are sold at a premium of €2 while Italian 'Toscano' oil has
been sold at a premium of 20% since it was registered as a GI in
1998. GIs are seen as a 'unique asset' in an increasingly liberalised
world. This forms part of a growing emphasis on the EU competing
internationally on quality. However this requires international
protection of those marks which constitute a designation of quality.
The memorandum notes that a number of developing
countries (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Kenya, Jamaica)
also have an interest in GIs, and argues that GIs are about free
trade, not protectionism. The EU's aim at the WTO is to:
establish a multilateral register for geographical
indications (TRIPS), operated in a simple and cost effective way;
extend geographical indication protection
to other products (TRIPS) such as rice, tea, cheese, ham;
ensure market access for EU GI products (Committee
on Agriculture) where restrictions currently exist.
The EU currently has registered some 4,800 geographical
indications (4,200 of them for wines and spirits). The memorandum
outlines the economic and employment impact of GIs in different
EU regions. The case of Spain is illustrative: in 1991 exports of
GI products amounted to €
443 million by 1999 they exceeded
€
1 billion. The Commission maintains that GIs create a 'genuine
niche for the development of agri-food industries for relatively
low development agricultural economies'.
Comment:
The issue of GIs is certainly of importance to a number of ACP countries
in terms of the protection it could give to particularly highly
regarded product varieties, but it also carries certain risks for
a number of ACP countries, most notably those that have developed
local industries replicating particular speciality products (e.g.
Namibian hams and spirits based on German speciality products).
Restructuring assistance may well be needed in these industries
in order to develop new marketing strategies and brand recognition
for products which will no longer be able to use the 'traditional'
terms. |
format |
News Item |
author |
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation |
spellingShingle |
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation The importance of geographical indications to the EU |
author_facet |
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation |
author_sort |
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation |
title |
The importance of geographical indications to the EU |
title_short |
The importance of geographical indications to the EU |
title_full |
The importance of geographical indications to the EU |
title_fullStr |
The importance of geographical indications to the EU |
title_full_unstemmed |
The importance of geographical indications to the EU |
title_sort |
importance of geographical indications to the eu |
publisher |
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation |
publishDate |
2003 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52628 http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/September-2003 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT technicalcentreforagriculturalandruralcooperation theimportanceofgeographicalindicationstotheeu AT technicalcentreforagriculturalandruralcooperation importanceofgeographicalindicationstotheeu |
_version_ |
1779051482255982592 |