Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs

Increased concern with participatory approaches to development has characterized donor agendas in recent years. In practice, this has meant increased support for non-government organizations (NGOs). A major study undertaken by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) in London, draws on over 70 case studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America to examine the roles of NGOs in this new climate. Focusing on sustainable agricultural development, it assesses the performance of NGOs in strengthening resource-poor farmers' capacities to make demands on external institutions and to organize their development initiatives, as well as their performance in promoting appropriate technological change and in interacting with government research and extension services. The study highlights not only the diverse range of NGOs, but also their strengths and weaknesses. Shortcomings include limited technical capabilities a preoccupation with action and short-term results and a disinclination to reflect upon, and share, their experience. However, on balance these short comings are outweighed by the number of successes in developing participatory methodologies and approaches which, in some cases, have been taken up by governments. Some NGOs have successful' developed new technologies, but more often they have developed approaches to strengthening local organizations as a means of facilitating change. The study is published by Routledge in four volumes: Reluctant partners? non-governmental organizations, the state and sustainable agricultural development, John Farrington and Anthony Bebbington with Kate Wellard and David J Lewis. Non-governmental organizations and the state in Asia: rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development, edited by John Farrington and David J Lewis. Non-governmental organizations and the state in Africa: rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development, edited by Kate Wellard and James G Copestake.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
Format: News Item biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation 1994
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/49383
http://collections.infocollections.org/ukedu/en/d/Jcta51e/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-49383
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-493832016-05-30T17:52:31Z Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation Increased concern with participatory approaches to development has characterized donor agendas in recent years. In practice, this has meant increased support for non-government organizations (NGOs). A major study undertaken by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) in London, draws on over 70 case studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America to examine the roles of NGOs in this new climate. Focusing on sustainable agricultural development, it assesses the performance of NGOs in strengthening resource-poor farmers' capacities to make demands on external institutions and to organize their development initiatives, as well as their performance in promoting appropriate technological change and in interacting with government research and extension services. The study highlights not only the diverse range of NGOs, but also their strengths and weaknesses. Shortcomings include limited technical capabilities a preoccupation with action and short-term results and a disinclination to reflect upon, and share, their experience. However, on balance these short comings are outweighed by the number of successes in developing participatory methodologies and approaches which, in some cases, have been taken up by governments. Some NGOs have successful' developed new technologies, but more often they have developed approaches to strengthening local organizations as a means of facilitating change. The study is published by Routledge in four volumes: Reluctant partners? non-governmental organizations, the state and sustainable agricultural development, John Farrington and Anthony Bebbington with Kate Wellard and David J Lewis. Non-governmental organizations and the state in Asia: rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development, edited by John Farrington and David J Lewis. Non-governmental organizations and the state in Africa: rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development, edited by Kate Wellard and James G Copestake. Reluctant partners? non-governmental organizations, the state and sustainable agricultural development, John Farrington and Anthony Bebbington with Kate Wellard and David J Lewis. Non-governmental organizations and the state in Asia: rethinking roles in 1994 2014-10-17T08:43:32Z 2014-10-17T08:43:32Z News Item CTA. 1994. Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs. Spore 51. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 1011-0054 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/49383 http://collections.infocollections.org/ukedu/en/d/Jcta51e/ en Spore, Spore 51 Open Access Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation Spore
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
description Increased concern with participatory approaches to development has characterized donor agendas in recent years. In practice, this has meant increased support for non-government organizations (NGOs). A major study undertaken by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) in London, draws on over 70 case studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America to examine the roles of NGOs in this new climate. Focusing on sustainable agricultural development, it assesses the performance of NGOs in strengthening resource-poor farmers' capacities to make demands on external institutions and to organize their development initiatives, as well as their performance in promoting appropriate technological change and in interacting with government research and extension services. The study highlights not only the diverse range of NGOs, but also their strengths and weaknesses. Shortcomings include limited technical capabilities a preoccupation with action and short-term results and a disinclination to reflect upon, and share, their experience. However, on balance these short comings are outweighed by the number of successes in developing participatory methodologies and approaches which, in some cases, have been taken up by governments. Some NGOs have successful' developed new technologies, but more often they have developed approaches to strengthening local organizations as a means of facilitating change. The study is published by Routledge in four volumes: Reluctant partners? non-governmental organizations, the state and sustainable agricultural development, John Farrington and Anthony Bebbington with Kate Wellard and David J Lewis. Non-governmental organizations and the state in Asia: rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development, edited by John Farrington and David J Lewis. Non-governmental organizations and the state in Africa: rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development, edited by Kate Wellard and James G Copestake.
format News Item
author Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
spellingShingle Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs
author_facet Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
author_sort Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
title Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs
title_short Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs
title_full Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs
title_fullStr Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs
title_full_unstemmed Strengths and weaknesses of NGOs
title_sort strengths and weaknesses of ngos
publisher Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
publishDate 1994
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/49383
http://collections.infocollections.org/ukedu/en/d/Jcta51e/
work_keys_str_mv AT technicalcentreforagriculturalandruralcooperation strengthsandweaknessesofngos
_version_ 1779059400875442176