Scalar disconnect: the logic of transboundary water governance in the Mekong

This article provides an institutional analysis of the Mekong River Commission and brings to light the institutional dissonances between regional and national decision-making landscapes in the Lower Mekong Basin. The current scalar disconnect between regional and national decision-making processes reflects how international donors and member country representatives obscure potential conflict/tension in transboundary water governance in the Mekong. From a scholarly perspective, it questions academic approaches that assume that the state is the sole or primary actor in international relations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suhardiman, Diana, Giordano, Mark, Molle, Francois
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Informa UK Limited 2012-06
Subjects:water management, international waters, water governance, institutions, corporate culture, decision making, government, bureaucracy, funding, river basins, development,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/40396
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.604398
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article provides an institutional analysis of the Mekong River Commission and brings to light the institutional dissonances between regional and national decision-making landscapes in the Lower Mekong Basin. The current scalar disconnect between regional and national decision-making processes reflects how international donors and member country representatives obscure potential conflict/tension in transboundary water governance in the Mekong. From a scholarly perspective, it questions academic approaches that assume that the state is the sole or primary actor in international relations.