Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva

Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) caused by different protozoan and rickettsial species occur all over the world but their greatest impact is in the tropics and subtropics where they cause huge losses mainly in improved breeds of cattle. The economically important tick-transmitted diseases of cattle are caused by the protozoan parasites Babesia bigemina and B. bovis, and Theileria parva and T. annulata, and by the rickettisial organisms Anaplasma marginale and Cowdria ruminantium. In the tropics, countries in the eastern and central regions of Africa are probably most affected. In these regions theileriosis, caused by T. parva, combined with babesiosis, anaplasmosis and cowdriosis, continues to restrict the introduction of improved breeds of cattle. Live vaccines for babesiosis, anaplasmosis and cowdriosis have been available and used for several years. Despite this, the intensive application of acaricides on cattle has been required mainly to control the brown ear tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, the principal vector of T. parva, for which no vaccine was available. In the last 20 years, a significant research effort has been put into the development of a vaccine against T. parva. This has resulted in the infection-and-treatment method of immunisation, which has opened up the possibility of reducing the use of acaricides. The FAO Regional Programme on Control of Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is deploying live vaccines to control TBDs (particularly theileriosis) as part of the integrated control of ticks and TBDs in the predominantly small holder dairy sector in the region. The live vaccines for tick-borne diseases other than theileriosis have been used for several decades and their efficacies have been well defined. However, the infection-and-treatment method immunisation against T. parva has only been used on a limited scale and the need to assess efficacy evaluate delivery systems and measure the long-term impact of immunisation is clearly recognised. This paper identifies the problems of producing and delivering a live vaccine against theileriosis and the parameters that need to be monitored to evaluate the efficacy and long-term biological impact of immunisation. The paper also briefly describes the technologies that are available to monitor immunisation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morzaria, S.P.
Format: Conference Paper biblioteca
Language:English
Published: International Livestock Research Institute 1996
Subjects:theileriosis, theileria parva, monitoring, immunisation, tickborne diseases, vaccines, antibodies,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2835
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2728
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-2835
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-28352023-12-21T14:51:48Z Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva Morzaria, S.P. theileriosis theileria parva monitoring immunisation tickborne diseases vaccines antibodies Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) caused by different protozoan and rickettsial species occur all over the world but their greatest impact is in the tropics and subtropics where they cause huge losses mainly in improved breeds of cattle. The economically important tick-transmitted diseases of cattle are caused by the protozoan parasites Babesia bigemina and B. bovis, and Theileria parva and T. annulata, and by the rickettisial organisms Anaplasma marginale and Cowdria ruminantium. In the tropics, countries in the eastern and central regions of Africa are probably most affected. In these regions theileriosis, caused by T. parva, combined with babesiosis, anaplasmosis and cowdriosis, continues to restrict the introduction of improved breeds of cattle. Live vaccines for babesiosis, anaplasmosis and cowdriosis have been available and used for several years. Despite this, the intensive application of acaricides on cattle has been required mainly to control the brown ear tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, the principal vector of T. parva, for which no vaccine was available. In the last 20 years, a significant research effort has been put into the development of a vaccine against T. parva. This has resulted in the infection-and-treatment method of immunisation, which has opened up the possibility of reducing the use of acaricides. The FAO Regional Programme on Control of Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is deploying live vaccines to control TBDs (particularly theileriosis) as part of the integrated control of ticks and TBDs in the predominantly small holder dairy sector in the region. The live vaccines for tick-borne diseases other than theileriosis have been used for several decades and their efficacies have been well defined. However, the infection-and-treatment method immunisation against T. parva has only been used on a limited scale and the need to assess efficacy evaluate delivery systems and measure the long-term impact of immunisation is clearly recognised. This paper identifies the problems of producing and delivering a live vaccine against theileriosis and the parameters that need to be monitored to evaluate the efficacy and long-term biological impact of immunisation. The paper also briefly describes the technologies that are available to monitor immunisation. 1996 2010-12-09T11:12:02Z 2010-12-09T11:12:02Z Conference Paper 92-9146-016-8 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2835 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2728 en Other Open Access International Livestock Research Institute
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic theileriosis
theileria parva
monitoring
immunisation
tickborne diseases
vaccines
antibodies
theileriosis
theileria parva
monitoring
immunisation
tickborne diseases
vaccines
antibodies
spellingShingle theileriosis
theileria parva
monitoring
immunisation
tickborne diseases
vaccines
antibodies
theileriosis
theileria parva
monitoring
immunisation
tickborne diseases
vaccines
antibodies
Morzaria, S.P.
Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva
description Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) caused by different protozoan and rickettsial species occur all over the world but their greatest impact is in the tropics and subtropics where they cause huge losses mainly in improved breeds of cattle. The economically important tick-transmitted diseases of cattle are caused by the protozoan parasites Babesia bigemina and B. bovis, and Theileria parva and T. annulata, and by the rickettisial organisms Anaplasma marginale and Cowdria ruminantium. In the tropics, countries in the eastern and central regions of Africa are probably most affected. In these regions theileriosis, caused by T. parva, combined with babesiosis, anaplasmosis and cowdriosis, continues to restrict the introduction of improved breeds of cattle. Live vaccines for babesiosis, anaplasmosis and cowdriosis have been available and used for several years. Despite this, the intensive application of acaricides on cattle has been required mainly to control the brown ear tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, the principal vector of T. parva, for which no vaccine was available. In the last 20 years, a significant research effort has been put into the development of a vaccine against T. parva. This has resulted in the infection-and-treatment method of immunisation, which has opened up the possibility of reducing the use of acaricides. The FAO Regional Programme on Control of Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is deploying live vaccines to control TBDs (particularly theileriosis) as part of the integrated control of ticks and TBDs in the predominantly small holder dairy sector in the region. The live vaccines for tick-borne diseases other than theileriosis have been used for several decades and their efficacies have been well defined. However, the infection-and-treatment method immunisation against T. parva has only been used on a limited scale and the need to assess efficacy evaluate delivery systems and measure the long-term impact of immunisation is clearly recognised. This paper identifies the problems of producing and delivering a live vaccine against theileriosis and the parameters that need to be monitored to evaluate the efficacy and long-term biological impact of immunisation. The paper also briefly describes the technologies that are available to monitor immunisation.
format Conference Paper
topic_facet theileriosis
theileria parva
monitoring
immunisation
tickborne diseases
vaccines
antibodies
author Morzaria, S.P.
author_facet Morzaria, S.P.
author_sort Morzaria, S.P.
title Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva
title_short Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva
title_full Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva
title_fullStr Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by Theileria parva
title_sort monitoring the efficacy of immunisation against theileriosis caused by theileria parva
publisher International Livestock Research Institute
publishDate 1996
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2835
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2728
work_keys_str_mv AT morzariasp monitoringtheefficacyofimmunisationagainsttheileriosiscausedbytheileriaparva
_version_ 1787231365201133568