Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR

Equitable interdisciplinary teamwork is easier said than done. For, it is not simply a matter of adding a “pinch” of social science into a larger interdisciplinary team, and stirring. Putting interdisciplinarity into action requires a more distilled and nuanced approach involving negotiation, bargaining and, sometimes, contestation and resistance between and among different domains of disciplinary actors, knowledge, meanings and understanding. The overarching goal for anthropologists and sociocultural scientists is to integrate theories, methodologies, and practices of the study of culture, politics, and social relations into agricultural and natural resource management research, as well as to integrate themselves into larger interdisciplinary teams on an equal footing. As McDonald argues in his call for a discussion on keeping the culture in agriculture, “by putting culture squarely at the center of any analysis of agriculture, we seek to “put people first” by exploring the complex ways that people conceptualize, give meaning to, and organize around agriculture” (McDonald 2005, p. 71). However, putting culture into the analysis of agriculture in research systems long dominated by biophysical scientists and approaches, such as within research centers of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), is challenging. This chapter describes the various dilemmas, challenges, and opportunities encountered by sociocultural scientists in interdisciplinary projects within the CGIAR. It argues that to more effectively address the needs and realities of vulnerable women and men at the grassroots, agricultural research systems must take more steps to fully integrate social, cultural, and political lines of inquiry into their core mandates.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Verma, R., Russell, D., German, L.
Format: Book Chapter biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Springer 2010
Subjects:anthropology, interdisciplinary research, development, gender,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20484
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/3135
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-20484
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-204842016-05-30T17:49:00Z Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR Verma, R. Russell, D. German, L. anthropology interdisciplinary research development gender Equitable interdisciplinary teamwork is easier said than done. For, it is not simply a matter of adding a “pinch” of social science into a larger interdisciplinary team, and stirring. Putting interdisciplinarity into action requires a more distilled and nuanced approach involving negotiation, bargaining and, sometimes, contestation and resistance between and among different domains of disciplinary actors, knowledge, meanings and understanding. The overarching goal for anthropologists and sociocultural scientists is to integrate theories, methodologies, and practices of the study of culture, politics, and social relations into agricultural and natural resource management research, as well as to integrate themselves into larger interdisciplinary teams on an equal footing. As McDonald argues in his call for a discussion on keeping the culture in agriculture, “by putting culture squarely at the center of any analysis of agriculture, we seek to “put people first” by exploring the complex ways that people conceptualize, give meaning to, and organize around agriculture” (McDonald 2005, p. 71). However, putting culture into the analysis of agriculture in research systems long dominated by biophysical scientists and approaches, such as within research centers of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), is challenging. This chapter describes the various dilemmas, challenges, and opportunities encountered by sociocultural scientists in interdisciplinary projects within the CGIAR. It argues that to more effectively address the needs and realities of vulnerable women and men at the grassroots, agricultural research systems must take more steps to fully integrate social, cultural, and political lines of inquiry into their core mandates. 2010 2012-06-04T09:13:24Z 2012-06-04T09:13:24Z Book Chapter Verma, R., Russell, D., German, L. 2010. Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR . In: German, L.A., Ramisch, J.J. and Verma, R. (eds.). Beyond the biophysical: knowledge, culture, and politics in agriculture and natural resource managemen. :257-281. London, UK, Springer. ISBN: 978-90-481-8825-3.. 978-90-481-8825-3 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20484 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/3135 en Springer
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic anthropology
interdisciplinary research
development
gender
anthropology
interdisciplinary research
development
gender
spellingShingle anthropology
interdisciplinary research
development
gender
anthropology
interdisciplinary research
development
gender
Verma, R.
Russell, D.
German, L.
Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR
description Equitable interdisciplinary teamwork is easier said than done. For, it is not simply a matter of adding a “pinch” of social science into a larger interdisciplinary team, and stirring. Putting interdisciplinarity into action requires a more distilled and nuanced approach involving negotiation, bargaining and, sometimes, contestation and resistance between and among different domains of disciplinary actors, knowledge, meanings and understanding. The overarching goal for anthropologists and sociocultural scientists is to integrate theories, methodologies, and practices of the study of culture, politics, and social relations into agricultural and natural resource management research, as well as to integrate themselves into larger interdisciplinary teams on an equal footing. As McDonald argues in his call for a discussion on keeping the culture in agriculture, “by putting culture squarely at the center of any analysis of agriculture, we seek to “put people first” by exploring the complex ways that people conceptualize, give meaning to, and organize around agriculture” (McDonald 2005, p. 71). However, putting culture into the analysis of agriculture in research systems long dominated by biophysical scientists and approaches, such as within research centers of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), is challenging. This chapter describes the various dilemmas, challenges, and opportunities encountered by sociocultural scientists in interdisciplinary projects within the CGIAR. It argues that to more effectively address the needs and realities of vulnerable women and men at the grassroots, agricultural research systems must take more steps to fully integrate social, cultural, and political lines of inquiry into their core mandates.
format Book Chapter
topic_facet anthropology
interdisciplinary research
development
gender
author Verma, R.
Russell, D.
German, L.
author_facet Verma, R.
Russell, D.
German, L.
author_sort Verma, R.
title Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR
title_short Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR
title_full Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR
title_fullStr Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR
title_full_unstemmed Anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the CGIAR
title_sort anthro-apology? negotiating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and in-depth anthropology in the cgiar
publisher Springer
publishDate 2010
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20484
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/3135
work_keys_str_mv AT vermar anthroapologynegotiatingspaceforinterdisciplinarycollaborationandindepthanthropologyinthecgiar
AT russelld anthroapologynegotiatingspaceforinterdisciplinarycollaborationandindepthanthropologyinthecgiar
AT germanl anthroapologynegotiatingspaceforinterdisciplinarycollaborationandindepthanthropologyinthecgiar
_version_ 1779062237482188800